in what increasingly looks like a personal vendetta, superintendent terry has held her in police cells for 23 hours before sending her to court without a lawyer, and then outrageously attempted to have her imprisoned while on bail for the alleged 'highway obstruction' offence. police also called for bail conditions preventing her from entering the designated zone around parliament, but this was thrown out almost immediately by a judge on appeal. superintendent terry even tried to have barbara sectioned under the mental health act, but thankfully she was accompanied by a solicitor at the time, who had never witnessed anything like it, and who forced the police to record 'no further action' on barbara's file.
despite the scores of 'reports' for unauthorised demonstrating, police have so far failed to take barbara to court for all these breaches. the one case they did bring was thrown out by the magistrate as 'void ab initio' which is latin for 'empty from the beginning' and suggests the whole case was flawed from the start. it is often a term used when judges believe a prosecution is malicious or corrupt, but they're not allowed to state it in such stark terms.
since then, police have tried to stick to non-socpa charges against barbara, attempting to separate other alleged misdemeanours and have them heard out of context of the socpa issue. recently they have been trying to get an 'obstruction of a police officer' case heard, but yesterday in a pre-trial hearing, barbara won the right to put most of her cases together and have the context right in front of a magistrate - something which could blow a big whole in any police prosecution and open them up for severe criticism.
so, given the apparent police vendetta against her, and their bloodied nose in court yesterday, it didn't come as much of a surprise to me to hear that she and steve jago (who has also been treated similarly by police, suffering several violent arrests and spurious charges while going about his peaceful protesting) were attacked just after 11.30 this morning.
the two protesters took up position on the small traffic island between parliament square proper, and the bottom of whitehall. they have done this before when blair passes for prime ministers question time, and they are both legally participants in brian haw's 'authorised' demonstration in the square when they join him on for this on wednesdays. but today was different, and they were soon swooped on by several police under the command of inspector price of charing cross. the 'socpa' offence (which they weren't committing anyway) is 'reportable' rather than arrestable, but this didn't impede the officers as they pushed barbara and steve first against the railings, and then dragged them into parliament square where they forced them down onto the ground. barbara's face was covered with mud as she was led off to the police van, and both looked very alarmed and distressed by the police actions.
delegates from a 'unison' union demonstration saw the whole thing and were shocked by the sight of peace activists being attacked in this way.
later, member of parliament john mcdonnell (who is standing against blair in a future leadership contest), came over to the square to collect information about what happened. he has written the following letter to the police commissioner, sir ian blair:
"22nd november 06
re: arrests in parliament square
i am writing as a matter of urgency to express my strong concern at the arrest of peaceful campaigners in parliament square this morning at approximately 11.40am.
my understanding is that the two campaigners, barbara tucker and steve jago, simply held up placards in the normal manner on the corner of parliament square as the prime minister was travelling to parliament for prime minister's question time. this has been a normal practice associated with the ongoing peace protest in parliament square. however, today, a large number of police arrived on foot, pounced upon the demonstrators, and forced them onto the railings and onto the walled section of the square. this caused them considerable distress and physical pain with risk of further injury. i now understand that the protesters are being held in charing cross police station.
i believe that the police team was led by an inspector price.
i am writing as a matter of urgency to inquire into the whereabouts of the two peace protesters and to request an investigation into why this action was taken in this manner."
the mp, who represents hayes and harlington, had to shoot back for a northern ireland bill, but promised to attend the square again tomorrow as part of brian haw's 2000th day celebration.
solicitors have attended charing cross police station, but there is no news yet as to the charges against barbara and steve or about their well-being or possible release time. i will obviously update here as soon as there is any news.
both peace protestors are now nursing a catalogue of wounds. steve's wrist is killing him. he feels sure that officer cs727 was trying to break it, first by bending it over the railings on the traffic island, but then, even once the handcuffs were on, by continually pulling at it, both manually and with the cuffs, his intent to cause maximum pain and damage. in the back of the police van on the way to charing cross the officer opened the communication hatch and asked sarcastically "how's your wrist dearie?". steve describes the arrest as "sheer torture". barbara's solicitor has amassed a long list of injuries to her client, including what she believes was an attempt to 'implode barbara's knuckles'. barbara's worst injury appears to be to her left kidney - at the police station she couldn't walk and was vomiting. she has been given painkillers and is intending to have it checked out further in the morning. one policeman claims to have been scratched on his arm.
both barbara and steve have described how they were approached by police officers while they were standing peacefully holding their protest banners. they informed police who threatened them with arrest that they could only be 'reported' not arrested, for 'unauthorised' protest. the next thing they knew they were surrounded by police who seemed intent to inflict maximum pain in minimum time.
remember that the only crime either of these people may have committed is to peacefully protest without 'authorisation' from the police.