Here is the maths as I understand them
The number of civilians killed by terrorist activity in recent times is by all known accounts considerably smaller than the civilians killed by the military activity of US and UK forces(as directed by Bush and Blair)
I therefore conclude that the maths show that the greatest danger must be US and UK forces when under the direction of Bush and Blair
I cannot therefore understand why Bush and Blair continue to insist they are protecting anyone

The maths show the greatest step they could take to protect civilian life would be to resign fron directing armed forces,this would also seriously reduce the death toll on serving soldiers in those armed forces

You can argue what you like you cant get around the mathmatical facts i.e
if 2 different things are killing people and one is killing far more than the other you can safely conclude the one that kills more people is more dangerous

How much longer can Bliar get away with spouting this dangerous nonsense that he is protecting us largely unchallenged by the media,even the Independent whch can be challenging to these issues has a senior political editor who is a Bliar apologist and some of his columnists are no better