Australia: Why does backbencher preach hate?
Rem | 01.11.2006 04:22 | Analysis | Anti-militarism | Anti-racism | World
A Federal Liberal backbencher in now preaching racial hatred in Australia when we have laws against inciting violence and preaching racial hatred. How come he doesn't know the laws? And who put him up to it?
Inciting violence and preaching racial hatred
Melbourne mp jason wood should be pulled up for his extremists views that are getting around the existing laws his government has created about inciting violence and preaching racial hatred in our community.
These are criminal acts.
The community is concerned about his governments continued attack on free speech and of twisting the truth that could, incite violence, racism and the slander and divisionalism of its citizenry.
Some civil libertarians have been much kinder to the war criminal Howard government and are denouncing it as anti-democratic and extreme.
But what would you expect from a war criminal as the head of state? Thats right not only war crimes but also more draconian laws one of the reason for pushing the racist nationalist extremist buttons in the first place.
wood entered Federal Parliament in 2004 after a career with the Victorian Police? So his racist views come natural.
The Victorian police force has been labelled the most corrupt police force in Australia so he gets no credit for being a former Victorian cop.
He says police need more powers to stop so-called "hate preachers", specifically laws that would allow courts to shut down mosques, prayer halls and churches.
But who's doing all the hate preaching? Yes he is and just following orders as usual for john howard the coward war criminal that can't or ought not be trusted by anyone anymore.
The most likely way we're going to have terrorists like him is by them being converted by Howard and the best way they're being converted is by people who they look up to like war criminal leaders Tony Blair and G W Bush.
To give an example - if they're standing up in front of an Australian Parliament and saying they support wars of aggression on Iraq, when they know they're responsible for the deaths of over 655,000 innocent dead men, women and children against the Iraqi people and then saying, we are heroes.
If they say they support mass murder, that's basically a message, an indirect message to there followers.
It's a subtle message to them, and planting the seed in their head that it's okay and you'll be supported because you are supporting George W Bush's democracy and you should join the army and head out onto the front line to be killed yourself.
These are criminal acts.
The community is concerned about his governments continued attack on free speech and of twisting the truth that could, incite violence, racism and the slander and divisionalism of its citizenry.
Some civil libertarians have been much kinder to the war criminal Howard government and are denouncing it as anti-democratic and extreme.
But what would you expect from a war criminal as the head of state? Thats right not only war crimes but also more draconian laws one of the reason for pushing the racist nationalist extremist buttons in the first place.
wood entered Federal Parliament in 2004 after a career with the Victorian Police? So his racist views come natural.
The Victorian police force has been labelled the most corrupt police force in Australia so he gets no credit for being a former Victorian cop.
He says police need more powers to stop so-called "hate preachers", specifically laws that would allow courts to shut down mosques, prayer halls and churches.
But who's doing all the hate preaching? Yes he is and just following orders as usual for john howard the coward war criminal that can't or ought not be trusted by anyone anymore.
The most likely way we're going to have terrorists like him is by them being converted by Howard and the best way they're being converted is by people who they look up to like war criminal leaders Tony Blair and G W Bush.
To give an example - if they're standing up in front of an Australian Parliament and saying they support wars of aggression on Iraq, when they know they're responsible for the deaths of over 655,000 innocent dead men, women and children against the Iraqi people and then saying, we are heroes.
If they say they support mass murder, that's basically a message, an indirect message to there followers.
It's a subtle message to them, and planting the seed in their head that it's okay and you'll be supported because you are supporting George W Bush's democracy and you should join the army and head out onto the front line to be killed yourself.
Rem
Comments
Display the following comment