Skip to content or view screen version

Tonkin redux to set off Iran war?

repost | 19.10.2006 16:14 | Anti-militarism | World

So much ruckus has been raised about the false-flag nuclear attack on US soil that would be used to kick off a nuclear confrontation with Iran that the military-industrial complex may be forced to go for their pretext plan B -- an attack on a US battleship. Although the attack would not have the psychological impact of a nuclear attack on US soil, a false-flag attack on a battleship has an advantage to the planners in that the military would be in total control of the scene of the crime and therefore the chain of evidence. this is the tactic that was used to set off the Vietnam War -- which was escalated into full-blown conflict by [1]the false flag attack on the USS Maddox in the Gulf on Tonkin. This time, it may be the USS Eisenhower in the Persian Gulf.


From the former Reform Party / Buchanan operative's [2]Hal Turner Show September 30:

"The Hal Turner Show has been told that within the next five (5) weeks, the United States will "suffer" a missile attack upon the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise, presently on patrol near the Persian Gulf. This attack will appear to be from numerous "Silkworm" and/or "Sunburn" missiles which will sink the vessel and kill most of the 5,000 crew onboard.

The "attack" will be blamed on Iran and thus provide the Bush Administration with an excuse to go to war with that nation.

The Hal Turner Show has learned that the missiles used to attack the USS Enterprise will not be fired from or by Iran, but rather will be a "false flag operation" made to LOOK as though Iran carried out the attack!

The USS Enterprise is the worlds first nuclear powered aircraft carrier. It was Commissioned in 1961 and is due to be decommissioned in 2014 or 2015. The ship was selected to be the "victim" of this "attack" due to its age.

THOSE PLANNING THE ATTACK ARE INSIDE THE U.S. AND ISRAELI GOVERNMENTS and view the loss of the Enterprise crew as a necessary sacrifice to induce Americans to support war against Iran. Put bluntly, the ship and crew are to be cannon fodder.

I am being fed more information and expect to be able to name names as to who is behind this plan. Check back..."

-----

From [3]The Nation September 21, 2006:

"The Nation has learned that the Bush Administration and the Pentagon have moved up the deployment of a major "strike group" of ships, including the nuclear aircraft carrier Eisenhower as well as a cruiser, destroyer, frigate, submarine escort and supply ship, to head for the Persian Gulf, just off Iran's western coast. This information follows a [4]report in the current issue of Time magazine, both online and in print, that a group of ships capable of mining harbors has received orders to be ready to sail for the Persian Gulf by October 1.

As Time writes in its cover story, "What Would War Look Like?," evidence of the forward deployment of minesweepers and word that the chief of naval operations had asked for a reworking of old plans for mining Iranian harbors "suggest that a much discussed--but until now largely theoretical--prospect has become real: that the U.S. may be preparing for war with Iran."

According to Lieut. Mike Kafka, a spokesman at the headquarters of the Second Fleet, based in Norfolk, Virginia, the Eisenhower Strike Group, bristling with Tomahawk cruise missiles, has received orders to depart the United States in a little over a week. Other official sources in the public affairs office of the Navy Department at the Pentagon confirm that this powerful armada is scheduled to arrive off the coast of Iran on or around October 21.

The Eisenhower had been in port at the Naval Station Norfolk for several years for refurbishing and refueling of its nuclear reactor; it had not been scheduled to depart for a new duty station until at least a month later, and possibly not till next spring. Family members, before the orders, had moved into the area and had until then expected to be with their sailor-spouses and parents in Virginia for some time yet. First word of the early dispatch of the "Ike Strike" group to the Persian Gulf region came from several angry officers on the ships involved, who contacted antiwar critics like retired Air Force [5]Col. Sam Gardiner and complained that they were being sent to attack Iran without any order from the Congress.

-----

References

1.  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/11/01/wviet01.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/11/01/ixworld.html

2.  http://halturnershow.com/index.html

3.  http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061009/lindorff

4.  http://time-proxy.yaga.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1535817,00%20.html

5.  http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Sam_Gardiner

repost
- Homepage: http://www.total411.info/2006/10/tonkin-redux-to-set-off-iran-war.html

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. At least one dubious source — hmm