Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Are the UAF institionally racist?

Rachel. | 04.10.2006 16:28

Why are the UAF igonoring the Kriss Donald case?

Kriss Donald was killed in a terrible racist attack, Kriss was white his attackers were not.
If Kriss had been non white and his attackers white, would the UAF have been so silent as they are now over the case? Of course they would not.
It's seem this case is being ignored by the UAF and other anti racist groups because the victim is white.
Therefore the UAF are institionally racist.

Rachel.

Comments

Display the following 9 comments

  1. Stop repeating yourselves — Pollokshields resident
  2. Why are you on about the BNP? — Rachel
  3. Repeat post — Auntie
  4. KRISS — Nigel
  5. Read slowly and try to understand — Pollokshields resident
  6. To Pollocksheilds resident — Progressive Contrarian
  7. Jeez — JohnC
  8. Race had nothing to do with it... — Another G42 resident
  9. Racist Attack — Nigel