NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST SECRECY IS PROMOTED BY JOKE COMPANY SECRETARY
scott white | 20.09.2006 18:39 | Analysis | Indymedia | London | World
Eso, Ibijoke [from Nigeria found in Dartford Kent - is she an illegal asylum seeker?] wrote [we need to look at her lack of qualifications for being a Company Secretary]: This email and any data attached with it is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this email in error please contact Notting Hill Housing Group immediately and permanently delete it.[It's a secret like the 45 misappropriated properties of the Trust!]
Please don't attach claims of confidentiality to emails addressed to
publicly-archived Indymedia mailing lists, such as UK-Tech. Your post is
already visible on the internet, and in fact it is necessary that this
should be so; Indymedia conducts its business in public. Legalistic
riders of this kind turn me off quite strongly.
If you want to have confidential exchanges with individual Indymedia
participants, then these riders might make some sense. But if
you post to these lists, it's fair for people to assume that you've read
the FAQ, and understand that any supposed confidentiality is forfeit by
the act of posting to the list.
As far as your complaint is concerned, I have inspected the page, and
what I see is some rather unpleasant comment, ammounting essentially to
rudeness. Instead of attempting to get Indymedia to censor these posts,
wouldn't it be a better idea to try to come to terms with your
antagonist? Indymedia is basically opposed to censorship, and is
committed to open publishing, and these complaints present volunteers
with problems that (in my opinion) you should be solving, not us.
Someone else may read your post and take a more sympathetic view than
the one I've expressed; but for my part, I have taken no action on your
complaint.
Jack (an Indymedia participant)
Please don't attach claims of confidentiality to emails addressed to
publicly-archived Indymedia mailing lists, such as UK-Tech. Your post is
already visible on the internet, and in fact it is necessary that this
should be so; Indymedia conducts its business in public. Legalistic
riders of this kind turn me off quite strongly.
If you want to have confidential exchanges with individual Indymedia
participants, then these riders might make some sense. But if
you post to these lists, it's fair for people to assume that you've read
the FAQ, and understand that any supposed confidentiality is forfeit by
the act of posting to the list.
As far as your complaint is concerned, I have inspected the page, and
what I see is some rather unpleasant comment, ammounting essentially to
rudeness. Instead of attempting to get Indymedia to censor these posts,
wouldn't it be a better idea to try to come to terms with your
antagonist? Indymedia is basically opposed to censorship, and is
committed to open publishing, and these complaints present volunteers
with problems that (in my opinion) you should be solving, not us.
Someone else may read your post and take a more sympathetic view than
the one I've expressed; but for my part, I have taken no action on your
complaint.
Jack (an Indymedia participant)
IBIJOKE [it's no Joke Ibi] ESO, [from Nigeria found in Dartford Kent - is she an illegal asylum seeker?] wrote [we need to look at her lack of qualifications for being a Company Secretary at Notting Hill Housing Trust - what happened to the only company she was ever involved in that went into Liquidation - why was she placed in the Trust - was it to commit deception - like before?]: This email and any data attached with it is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this email in error please contact Notting Hill Housing Group [Notting Hill Housing Trust and any other entity linked with the Notting Hill Housing with its 19,000 properties and 21 charity shops that is the biggest con in London where the housing group abuses any of its tenants that complain. The email appears to be indicating something rotten by some person who appears to have been over-promoted and is promoting multiculturalism and tenant abuse - why? is she doing the work of New Labour?] immediately and permanently delete it. [It's a secret email - like all the dirty secrets at Notting Hill Housing Trust against the interests of the tenants and the taxpayers and the 'losing' of Trust properties including the 45 misappropriated properties of the Trust!]
Please don't attach claims of confidentiality to emails addressed to
publicly-archived Indymedia mailing lists, such as UK-Tech. Your post is
already visible on the internet, and in fact it is necessary that this
should be so; Indymedia conducts its business in public. Legalistic
riders of this kind turn me off quite strongly. This is what Labour Lord Tom Sawyer does as does Labour Lord Clive Soley does as does New Labour Nic Raynsford the ex Labour Housing Minister and Jonathan Buchanan the MI6 Officer who is a Director at Notting Hill Housing Trust at 27 Hammersmith Grove, Hammersmith London W6 OLJ. Just off King Street, Hammersmith.
If you want to have confidential exchanges with individual Indymedia
participants, then these riders might make some sense. But if
you post to these lists, it's fair for people to assume that you've read
the FAQ, and understand that any supposed confidentiality is forfeit by
the act of posting to the list. Sorry, but IBIJOKE ESO has a poor grasp of English and everything needs to be spelt out to her - that is why she was made the Company Secretary of Notting HIll Housing Trust!]
As far as your complaint is concerned, I have inspected the page, and
what I see is some rather unpleasant comment, amounting essentially to
rudeness. Instead of attempting to get Indymedia to censor these posts,
wouldn't it be a better idea to try to come to terms with your
antagonist? [Why not be more transparent, accountable and open in your dealings with good tenants - instead of acting like dictators bent on hostility and aggression - just look what you did to poor Onike Porther - the manger that was recently killed by your senior staff - were you involved in her death? Do you want to suppress the background of her death?] Indymedia is basically opposed to censorship, and is committed to open publishing, and these complaints present volunteers with problems that (in my opinion) you should be solving, not us.
[Yet Notting Hill Housing Trust seem to enjoy and promote abuse of good tenants and provoke hostility of tenants on the widest scale possible.]
Someone else may read your post and take a more sympathetic view than
the one I've expressed; but for my part, I have taken no action on your
complaint.
Jack
(an Indymedia participant)
Please don't attach claims of confidentiality to emails addressed to
publicly-archived Indymedia mailing lists, such as UK-Tech. Your post is
already visible on the internet, and in fact it is necessary that this
should be so; Indymedia conducts its business in public. Legalistic
riders of this kind turn me off quite strongly. This is what Labour Lord Tom Sawyer does as does Labour Lord Clive Soley does as does New Labour Nic Raynsford the ex Labour Housing Minister and Jonathan Buchanan the MI6 Officer who is a Director at Notting Hill Housing Trust at 27 Hammersmith Grove, Hammersmith London W6 OLJ. Just off King Street, Hammersmith.
If you want to have confidential exchanges with individual Indymedia
participants, then these riders might make some sense. But if
you post to these lists, it's fair for people to assume that you've read
the FAQ, and understand that any supposed confidentiality is forfeit by
the act of posting to the list. Sorry, but IBIJOKE ESO has a poor grasp of English and everything needs to be spelt out to her - that is why she was made the Company Secretary of Notting HIll Housing Trust!]
As far as your complaint is concerned, I have inspected the page, and
what I see is some rather unpleasant comment, amounting essentially to
rudeness. Instead of attempting to get Indymedia to censor these posts,
wouldn't it be a better idea to try to come to terms with your
antagonist? [Why not be more transparent, accountable and open in your dealings with good tenants - instead of acting like dictators bent on hostility and aggression - just look what you did to poor Onike Porther - the manger that was recently killed by your senior staff - were you involved in her death? Do you want to suppress the background of her death?] Indymedia is basically opposed to censorship, and is committed to open publishing, and these complaints present volunteers with problems that (in my opinion) you should be solving, not us.
[Yet Notting Hill Housing Trust seem to enjoy and promote abuse of good tenants and provoke hostility of tenants on the widest scale possible.]
Someone else may read your post and take a more sympathetic view than
the one I've expressed; but for my part, I have taken no action on your
complaint.
Jack
(an Indymedia participant)
scott white