Nottingham Asylum-Seekers will be Heard
Laura Norder | 19.09.2006 21:11 | Migration | Repression | Social Struggles
The situation faced by Asylum-Seekers in the UK is enough to make you realise we live in an insane society. In the East Midlands a centralised HO reporting building has been set up in the small town of Loughbrough, twenty miles from the towns where most A-Ss actually live.
The new centre is like Fort Knox. Its barred windows and security checkpoints make it clear that if they don’t want you to get out, you won’t. Many from Nottingham have been told to attend Nottingham with no indication of whether they can claim the fare back. Little or no information has been given about how to get to Loughborough, when the switch would be made, and how to get more information about it. One of the first asylum seekers to be transferred to the new office was told to sign on the fifth of every month! What if it’s a weekend? Who would invent such a system except an idiot; or a sadist trying to prevent A-S having any identity except one of dependency on the system.
The new centre is like Fort Knox. Its barred windows and security checkpoints make it clear that if they don’t want you to get out, you won’t. Many from Nottingham have been told to attend Nottingham with no indication of whether they can claim the fare back. Little or no information has been given about how to get to Loughborough, when the switch would be made, and how to get more information about it. One of the first asylum seekers to be transferred to the new office was told to sign on the fifth of every month! What if it’s a weekend? Who would invent such a system except an idiot; or a sadist trying to prevent A-S having any identity except one of dependency on the system.
But A-S are not taking this lying down. In Glasgow a meeting of 200 hundred established UNITY -Scottish Asylum Seekers Union and already has an advice shop opposite the Glasgow HO office. Campaigning is being done thee on issues such as the right to employment. They are being supported in this by anarchists and other activists on the non-authoritarian left. On Merseyside too a group has been set up by A-S, called Voice of Asylum Seekers (Liverpool), which recently organised a series of demonstrations, leaflets and a workshops in conjunction with the Student Action for Refugees.
The initial response in Nottingham at a meeting called to discuss the Loughborough problem was the understandable suggestion to refuse to report to the new centre. But such defiance is difficult if you are entirely dependent on the state for what little you have, which they will take away from you if you don’t report. Media coverage of the issue has been effective, and a street protest meeting took place outside St. Peter’s Church on Saturday September 9th. Asylum Seekers and activists from the Notts and Nottingham Refugee Forum Campaign Group organised the rally. Leafleting resulted in the first sixty signatures on a petition, and public responses were almost all favourable to the position Asylum Seekers find themselves in; in most cases because of the stupidity and indignity of the situation but also, in one case, in response to the case that taxes are being wasted if the pittance the government gives AS gets given to private bus companies!
The initial response in Nottingham at a meeting called to discuss the Loughborough problem was the understandable suggestion to refuse to report to the new centre. But such defiance is difficult if you are entirely dependent on the state for what little you have, which they will take away from you if you don’t report. Media coverage of the issue has been effective, and a street protest meeting took place outside St. Peter’s Church on Saturday September 9th. Asylum Seekers and activists from the Notts and Nottingham Refugee Forum Campaign Group organised the rally. Leafleting resulted in the first sixty signatures on a petition, and public responses were almost all favourable to the position Asylum Seekers find themselves in; in most cases because of the stupidity and indignity of the situation but also, in one case, in response to the case that taxes are being wasted if the pittance the government gives AS gets given to private bus companies!
Laura Norder
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
If you have to travel more than three miles to report, you can claim the expense
21.09.2006 15:10
The Home Office has introduced travel expenses under Section 69 of the NIA. This is to help people adhere to their reporting restrictions under paragraph 21 of Schedule 2 to the Immigration Act 1971 (temporary admission or release), paragraph 29 of that Schedule (bail pending appeal) and paragraphs 2 or 5 of Schedule 3 to that Act (release subject to restrictions pending deportation).
Contact Management Policy, Process & Implementation June 2006
http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/lawandpolicy/travelexpenses
Travel Expenses Policy
1. Introduction: Contact Management (CM) is the means by which the Immigration Service (IS) maintains contact with asylum seekers & other applicants throughout the application process.
The legal basis for requiring an applicant to report to the IS, or the police, is paragraph 21 of Schedule 2 to the Immigration Act 1971 (temporary admission or release), paragraph 29 of that Schedule (bail pending appeal) and paragraphs 2 or 5 of Schedule 3 to that Act (release subject to restrictions pending deportation). Section 69 of the NIA states that the Secretary of State may make a payment towards the cost of travelling expenses to enable persons to comply with reporting restrictions.
Dedicated IS Reporting Centres (RCs) have been established to support contact management objectives. There are currently eleven RCs ˆ four in London, and one each at Folkestone, Solihull, Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, North Shields and Glasgow. Additional CM coverage is supplied by locating IS staff in police stations. Payment of travelling expenses will be introduced by a phased rollout to RCs with payments for reporting to police stations being introduced at a later date.
Where a subject reports to a reporting centre or IS staffed police station that has not yet commenced payment of travelling expenses and is experiencing difficulties in reporting, consideration will be given on a case by case basis to amending his or her reporting regime until such time as payment of travelling expenses commences. Representations should be made to the immigration office responsible for the reporting regime.
All queries relating to this policy should be referred to UKIS Contact Management Policy, Process & Implementation team.
2.1 Criteria: Assistance to meet the cost of travel will only be payable to subjects required to regularly report as part of their conditions of temporary admission / release. Travelling expenses will not be paid under this provision where people are directed to attend for an interview in connection with their immigration status or for other matters, unless such events are included within an existing reporting regime.
Travelling expenses will only be payable from the date the process is rolled out at specific reporting centres. No consideration will be given to any retrospective payments for reporting.
Applications for travel expenses must be made in person at a reporting centre. Where an application is approved at a reporting centre subjects will receive a travel ticket for their journey home and for their next reporting event.
2.2 Reporting Distances: Subjects living less than 3 miles from the reporting centre will not be eligible to receive help with travelling expenses except in cases of exceptional need.
The 3 miles will be calculated as a radius from the reporting centre.
2.3 Reporting Centre Applications: Asylum Seekers living 3 miles or more from their reporting centre who receive NASS support under S95 or S4 are eligible to receive help with travel expenses for reporting.
2.4 Restrictions: Where an application has been approved, payment will only be made for the person required to report. Payment for other persons to accompany the subject will be considered under the exceptional needs provisions.
2.5 Exceptional Needs: Where a subject does not have automatic entitlement to travel expenses or has automatic entitlement but has additional requirements a claim for exceptional need can be made.
Exceptional need claims will be considered centrally by CMPPI.
Where refused, subjects will be advised in writing; where granted, subjects will be advised in writing, outlining where appropriate the length of time the payments will continue and will also be provided with a travel ticket in order for them to meet their next reporting event.
When exceptional need is granted it will only be from the date the claim was decided on; no provision will be made for retrospective payment of travelling expenses in exceptional needs cases.
2.6 Review: When an exceptional need claim is refused the subject will have the right of review against the decision. The request for review will be considered by CMPPI. If then granted on review this will be from the date of the review decision; no provision will be made for retrospective payment of travelling expenses. If exceptional need is refused the subject will have no further right of review.
2.7 Lost and Stolen Tickets: Tickets that are reported lost or stolen will only be replaced in exceptional circumstances as part of the exceptional needs provisions.
3. Payments
3.1 Claiming: Subjects entitled to travel expenses will receive assistance towards the cost of travel on request.
Subjects not entitled when requesting assistance will receive a leaflet outlining the policy for travelling expenses. The leaflet will contain information and a claim form on how to claim travelling expenses due
to exceptional needs.
3.2 Non cash payments: All costs for travelling provided to subjects will only be in the form of travel tickets made valid for the subjects next reporting event. Under no circumstances will assistance for the cost of travel be made in cash. Tickets will be solely for use on public transport covered by a local Passenger Transport Executive.
John O
e-mail: ncadc@ncadc.org.uk
Homepage: http://www.org.uk
TCAR - Saturday 19th May 2007 - National Day of Action
14.05.2007 21:17
To find out more, visit:
http://www.frfinortheast.co.uk/
Citizen Sputnik
Home Office Humour
29.11.2007 21:20
The Bush regime's war of terror against the poor of the world is a pretext for oppressing those who justly defy globalisation. Europe's asylum crisis is a direct result.
Through its complicity in U.S. policy, our government is responsible. We we owe it to those who have sought asylum here to do all that we can for them.
John Rhys-Burgess
e-mail: cmss.info@gmail.com