Skip to content or view screen version

the myspace con !

m | 07.09.2006 14:26 | Globalisation | Technology | World

Misguided by the web

What is wrong with everyone?
Why does everyone seem to think the cool thing to have and use is myspace?
It is owned by Fox News aka Murdoch.
They now have a vastly growing database of all people registering, their personal details and preferences and whom they are in contact with. Its so damn easy for them, and we keep encouraging them by signing up for for more myspace accounts.
The government won't need the bloody id cards now, they've already got most of us tagged on myf****ngspace!

m

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

Some insight from Wired

07.09.2006 15:06

An interesting article in Wired on Fox's aquisition of Myspace.

Drax the Destroyer
- Homepage: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.07/murdoch.html


MySpace Invaders

07.09.2006 17:45

Santa Cruz, California corporate-weekly article: MySpace Invaders

Santa Cruz artists consider the pros and cons of selling themselves to Rupert Murdoch
 http://metroactive.com/metro-santa-cruz/04.12.06/myspace-0615.html

no fan of MySpace


Google is the biggest Con

07.09.2006 18:07

myspace is a baby. Google is the new Ali Baba on the block, gullible masses are giving google infomation(stock) for free not mentioning the "Adsense"and google is making a fortune. What a laugh!!!! Uh, they also put profit before human rights in China.

jerome


You got me thinking!

07.09.2006 20:29

Seems that ye-olde-Indymedia is a tad out of date - it takes ages to post, you don't know who else is online, there are no tools to organise a riot (oops event), and where are the poster profiles?
Given the lies told by the evil Australian (oops American) I doubt that 'free speech' is allowed on 'stalk-space'. I detect market opportunity! Time to make Indymedia the place for people wanting to 'be the media' and do more with their time than check out the local talent. Indymedia could evolve along the lines of 'Slashdot' rather than 'Stalk-space', maybe with one global site instead of lots of unconnected 'local' sites stuffed with dull reposts.
So long as a committee doesn't have to botch it, a tried and tested open-source 'postNuke' could be put together in a weekend. We could leave it to the individual readers to decide what they censor and lock it down so that the government snitches cannot surf in the shadows. All possible with cryptography.
Who is up for Indymedia2?

required


You got me thinking too

08.09.2006 05:03

You got me thinking!

07.09.2006 22:29
Seems that ye-olde-Indymedia is a tad out of date - it takes ages to post, you don't know who else is online, there are no tools to organise a riot (oops event), and where are the poster profiles?
Given the lies told by the evil Australian (oops American) I doubt that 'free speech' is allowed on 'stalk-space'. I detect market opportunity! Time to make Indymedia the place for people wanting to 'be the media' and do more with their time than check out the local talent. Indymedia could evolve along the lines of 'Slashdot' rather than 'Stalk-space', maybe with one global site instead of lots of unconnected 'local' sites stuffed with dull reposts.
So long as a committee doesn't have to botch it, a tried and tested open-source 'postNuke' could be put together in a weekend. We could leave it to the individual readers to decide what they censor and lock it down so that the government snitches cannot surf in the shadows. All possible with cryptography.
Who is up for Indymedia2?

required
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I'm game: time to upgrade/update and make this a meaningful and more real-time virtual space

dr jeckyl does not hyde


Sounds good

08.09.2006 11:40

though actually it sounds like a standard forum. Anyway, yes, interested and would also be interested in participating in some way.

Soupspoon
- Homepage: http://82.69.12.18/lancasteruafblog/