9/11 INSIDE JOB, where are our academics on 7/7?

75 leading professors and scientists in the US say there is now evidence that 9/11 was perpetrated by the Whitehouse to justify invasions in the Middle East according to a Daily Mail report, yes I know shocking, the Hate Mail publishing anything but it is on the net so not sure if it is in their disgusing hate filled, neo-nazi sympathetic rag.. Fury as academics claim 9/11 was 'inside job' ... could be news as the only Hate Mail story worth repeating ever!!! i am getting ideas from moron press ... i don't even get paid to think like this ...
Where are British academics on the real events of july 7th
Where is the public inquiry
Where are the academics looking at the evidence against so called Al Qaeda operatives in the UK?

Is it because the corporate media are just morons or is it because they are so subservient to the stupid Queen, their divine ruler, and the leader Tony Blair, who would not be the real elected leader if there were real democracy and given the widespread postal election fraud should not be leader at all.

How many more times will the corporate media cover the arrest of innocent people and ask Muslim people to justify terror and war created by the Government and its own moron reporters. Lets stand up for our democracy and our soldiers ... please, let these killing machines stand up for themselves

notowar

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

Mainstream media coverage

06.09.2006 10:46

So the UK is catching up with the rest of Europe and the US in terms of the media coverage of 9/11 truth...

In additon to the Hate Mail article the Gruniad ran this yesterday:

Who really blew up the twin towers?
As the fifth anniversary of 9/11 nears, Christina Asquith finds academics querying the official version of events
Tuesday September 5, 2006

http://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekly/story/0,,1864524,00.html

And some local rags are reporting on local truth campaigns:

'OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY CHALLENGED
A GROUP of Sussex people – concerned at 'anomalies' surrounding the official story of the terror attacks of September 11, 2001 – have invited the chairman of the Britain and Ireland 9/11 Truth Campaign to give a presentation at All Saints, Lewes, on Tuesday, September 5.

http://www.seafordtoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=509&ArticleID=1741597

And David Ray Griffin is on Heaven and Earth on BBC1 Sunday 10:00am - 11:00am to, no doubt, talk about his book, "Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11" that has been rejected by Amazon in the US

http://www.911blogger.com/node/2479

Though it is available in the UK:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Christian-Faith-Truth-Behind-Reflection/dp/0664231179/

shadowplay

Have a nice day...

06.09.2006 15:36

Evidentially true?

The 'scholars for truth' have been confusing people with the 'explosives in towers'/'wtc 7 pulled'/'missile hit the pentagon' rubbish for far too long. Their speculation is very damaging, albeit not as harmful as the speculation that 'Osama did it'.
The real scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have almost all the answers:

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

The earlier full report is up there too -

http://wtc.nist.gov - however, the FAQ tells you all you need to know when it comes to debunking the idle 'scholars' speculation. That said, the NIST reports do not answer the question regarding whom it was that was piloting those planes. Note that 757/767's are not 'fly by wire', and that it was 757/767 planes that were hijacked that day, not 777's or Airbus, i.e. 'fly by wire' planes.

Here are a few statements of fact regarding that day:

9/11 was the opening day of the DSEi arms-trade fair in London's Docklands.

The first people to speculate that it was 'the bloke in a cave' worked for Jane's Information Group - the same company that promoted that arms-trade fair.

When it comes to showing some care and consideration for all those that had their lives ruined or lost on that day, you might want to ask whom it really was that sabotaged the Pentagon (arms) and pulled down the World Trade Centre (trade), on that very opening day of that arms-trade fair. You might also want to wonder why it was that the 'aviation experts' from Jane's Information Group failed to mention threats made in advance by the small, 'insurrectionary' group 'disarm-DSEi' to disarm the arms-traders on that very day.

Thankyou.

Fred West

Insider Trading

07.09.2006 14:49

Many companies benefited from the 9/11 "attack". One company, an armstrader named Raytheon, saw its stock saw immediately after the attack. One of their best customers is the CIA . For further details visit www.911research.wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html

MATT BLACK

Alternative 9/11 film

07.09.2006 14:56

For those of you who've not yet seen it, heres an interesting film regarding the 9/11 "attack".

http://www.loosechange911.com/

Matt Black

911 and Blair

07.09.2006 15:54

On 7 June, 2001 the UK 'Labour' government secured a second election victory, losing only six seats overall since the 1997 election. Tony Blair was due to present a speech to the conference of the Trade Unions Congress (TUC) on September 11, 2001. The unions had become increasingly angered by Tony Blair's actions and somewhat of a showdown was expected. From the unions' perspective, having helped elect Tory Bliar and the 'Labour' government, they expected some benefit. The unions and the Labour Party had always been on the same side. What had happened? They might have felt that the Labour Party had been hijacked and now they wanted it back.

Blair addressed the TUC conference along the lines of "Can't stop. There have been terrible atrocities in the States. Got to go."

Blair did not address the TUC conference again until September 2004 having been busy arranging chaos and disaster in the Middle East. With an election expected in May 2005, the unions' hands were tied. "I'm back", says Blair, smiling.

Could Blair have survived without these wars based on lies? I think not.

dizzy