11 Protest

The British 9/11 Truth Campaign,

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/ are inviting people to protest outside the US Embassy on Monday September 11th 2006:

Join us on our National Demonstration to commemorate the 5th anniversary outside the US Embassy, Grosvenor Square in London on 11 September 2006 from 12:30pm -2:30pm. Supporters are urged to bring a flower to lay at the 9/11 Memorial Tree and wear black in memory of all those who have lost their lives.

Truth Concert @ Brixton Mass

The protest is part of a weekend of events:

1. David Ray Griffin Talk - Saturday evening:

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/london/2006/08/347911.html

2. National Gathering @ Brixton Mass - Sunday 11 - 5pm

3. Truth Concert @ Brixton Mass, Sunday evening 7 - 11

4. Vigil/demonstration outside US embassy, Monday noon

The line up for the Sunday nmight includes:

http://www.myspace.com/manage very up and coming socially conscious hip hop

http://www.myspace.com/robtherub accoustic set. Great song 'George Bush is'

http://www.myspace.com/rizmc just released a song 'Post 9/11 Blues', also played one of the Tipton 3 in Channel 4's 'The Road to Guantanamo' and is about to start in the new production 'Gadaffi, The Musical'

http://www.myspace.com/elcrisis Great acapella socially aware artist

The 9/11 Truth Campaign (Britain & Ireland) is calling for a new independent inquiry into the events of 9/11. Here are a few of the many reasons:

· Why did the Bush Admin do their best to postpone the investigation into 9/11? When it did eventually happen, the Bush administration provided funding of less than half ($15m) spent on investigating Clinton's affair with Lewinsky ($40m)!

· Why did Bush and Cheney refuse to testify under oath and refuse to speak to the Commission separately?

· Why did World Trade Center Building 7 fall down at 17:20 on September 11th 2001 in the manner of a controlled demolition, when no planes were flown into it? and why was there no mention of it in the NIST investigation report?

· Why was Dick Cheney in charge of NORAD?

· Why were there so many war games on the morning of 9/11?

· Why was the $100000 transfer to Mohammed Atta by General Mahmood Ahmad of the ISI (Pakistani Intelligence) not investigated?

· Why is Osama Bin Laden blamed for the 9/11 attacks when the FBI themselves admit they have no hard evidence to indict him with?

· Why were the names of the alleged hijackers not on the passenger lists submitted by United and American Airlines?

· Why were there huge surges in purchases of put options on stocks of United and American Airlines in the days before 9/11 and why were they not investigated?

· Why was war in Afghanistan being planned BEFORE the September 11th attacks occured?

· Why was Sibel Edmonds (FBI) given more gag-orders than anyone in US history after she testified that FBI officials were involved in espionage and security breaches in their investigation into the events of 9/11?

9/11 has been used as a pretext to take us into wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and possibly a third with Iran. Surely we deserve to know the facts? The ensuing "war on terror" has also been used to justify the erosion of our civil liberties and traditional freedoms in the UK and USA.

2001-09-11
Homepage: http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Wakey wakey!

01.09.2006 02:18

Okay smart-asses, who blamed Osama first?

If any of you cleverdicks can be bothered to work that out, instead of wittering on about bloody building seven the whole time then you might get somewhere towards a worthwhile investigation. But hey, that needs guts!

The first '9/11 truth whatever person' to come up with the answer to this simple question deserves a clap, if not a medal.

In case you did not get the simple question, here it is in big blocky capitals:

WHO BLAMED OSAMA BIN LADEN FIRST FOR THE EVENTS OF 9/11?

Obviously a bit tough, I mean, why would anyone want to know who came up with the whacky al-qaeda conspiracy theory first, particularly when there is Building seven to go on about forever, not to mention those explosives, or those black helicopters hologram projecting 767's for the world to see...

Just to make it slightly easier for any utter retards that have mislaid their brains, memories and research capabilities, here is a clue:

9/11 was the opening day of the world's largest arms-trade fair, the DSEi, in London's Docklands. The company responsible for that and other arms-trade fairs is 'Spearhead'. On 11 September 2001 'Janes Information Group' owned 'Spearhead'.

Now, if anyone can guess whom the 'aviation experts' on the B.B.C. were that day, whom they blamed, and whom they might have worked for, then you should be able to hopefully stand a small chance at getting near the answer. Just to remind you of the question again:

WHO BLAMED OSAMA BIN LADEN FIRST FOR THE EVENTS OF 9/11?

Just to help you narrow it down a bit, this tricky question could be posed as a multiple choice, so who blamed Osama first, was it:

a) aviation experts that happened to be doing the P.R. for the biggest arms-trade fair of all, coincidentally opening that day?

b) mother teresa?

c) the leadership of some made up terror group, i.e. Osama Himself?

Sorry to spoon-feed but these '9/11 truth-people' are complete time wasters, more interested in selling their little books than moving the story on and helping victims find closure. They remind me of 'cerealology'. What is 'cerealology', I hear you ask? It is crop circles, made by men, passed off by others as the 'works of aliens'. The devoted cerealologist will deny and not want to know how the crop circles are actually man-made, the myth and the fuzzy bullshit is what matters to them, and their world would fall apart if the 'mystical' were to be destroyed. Time to destroy myths on the 9/11 hoax - it was a bloody protest against the arms-trade fair by people from the anti-capitalist movement, hence the date and the targets. It is not difficult, but tragically, the 9/11 truth-movement have no more interest in the truth than the arms-traders have. Go figure!

T.W.A.T. hater

Just when you thought it couldn't get dafter...

01.09.2006 12:30

...than the theories from the 911 Truth people, up pops some nut-job claiming that the attacks were carried out by anti-capitalists as a protest against an arms fair in London. Seems even harder to believe that one given that a) anti-capitalists do not have a history of suicide attacks, as far as I'm aware & b) it would be more logical for them to have flown the planes into, well, buildings in London. Duh.

Yes, US officials and media have exaggerated the role of Al Qaida, suggesting it's some Bond villain type super-crime organisation with a clear chain of command rather than a series of vaguely connected groups, and some utterly unconnected but inspired-at-a-distance groups, rallying together under one franchise (much like the so-called "anti-capitalist movement"). Jason Burke's book is good on explaining this.

But why would people think that militant bombers linked to Bin Laden might attack US symbols of power? Erm.. because they had done so on several occasions before, maybe? And he claimed responsibility?

Norville B

protest against 9/11

03.09.2006 01:15

Protest that they didn't get the fucking White House as well, more like!

protester

What an odd theory

03.09.2006 20:51

Hey Norville, you talk about dumb theories, check this one out. Some crackpot calling himself 'bush'(self-proclaimed 'president' of America) claims it was done by Muslims that hate American society and want to destroy it or some crap. And then some 'bin-laden' character claims responsability for it! You see the hole in this theory is that anybody would have seen the terrible impact that this would have on the global Muslim community. But no, not our Goldstein, he couldn't see that his actions would only benefit the big businesses in the west(oil, arms, munitions etc).

Ahh, these nutters and their theories. I put this one down with the lizard-man theory. Actually, no I don't, at least that theory is actually pheasable!

UK Indymedia