Skip to content or view screen version

Rules of the Western Media in dealing with the Middle East

Michel Collon | 17.08.2006 13:16 | Lebanon War 2006 | Analysis | Anti-militarism | Anti-racism | World

This is a piece by Michel Collon on the media reporting of the Middle East.

Rule 1: In the Middle East, it is always the Arabs that attack first, and it's always Israel who defends itself. This is called "retaliation".

Rule 2: The Arabs, whether Palestinians or Lebanese, are not allowed to kill Israelis. This is called "terrorism".

Rule 3: Israel has the right to kill Arab civilians; this is called "self-defense", or these days "collateral damage".

Rule 4: When Israel kills too many civilians. The Western world calls for restraint. This is called the "reaction of the international community".

Rule 5: Palestinians and Lebanese do not have the right to capture Israeli military, not even a limited number, not even 1 or 2.

Rule 6: Israel has the right to capture as many Palestinians as they want (Palestinians: around 10000 to date, 300 of which are children, Lebanese: 1000s to date, being held without trial). There is no limit; there is no need for proof of guilt or trial. All that is needed is the magic word: "terrorism"

Rule 7: When you say "Hezbollah", always be sure to add "supported by Syria and Iran"

Rule 8: When you say "Israel", never say "supported by the USA, the UK and other European countries", for people (God forbid) might believe this is not an equal conflict.

Rule 9: When it comes to Israel, don't mention the words "occupied territories", "UN resolutions", "Geneva conventions". This could distress the audience of Fox.

Rule 10: Israelis speak better English than Arabs. This is why we let them
Speak out as much as possible, so that they can explain rules 1 through 9. This is called "neutral journalism".

Rule 11: If you don't agree with these rules or if you favor the Arab side over the Israeli side, you must be a very dangerous anti-Semite. You may even have to make a public apology if you express your honest opinion (isn't democracy wonderful ?).

Source :  http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/assawra/

Michel Collon
- e-mail: michel.collon@skynet.be

Comments

Hide the following comment

Just a start

17.08.2006 15:25

yeah your list is a start although you could be more precise it really wouldn't be hard to put together a list of media highlighting the differences.
The Arabs kidnap or abduct while the Israelis arrest or detain, the recent arrest of half the democratically elected palestinian parliment is a good example compared to the capture of two Israeli soldiers which was obviously a kidnapping for our media chums.
Palestinians are invariably gunmen or militants.
Even when after an attack with missiles on a civilian car by military aricraft which left a burnt out car and a crater in the road, the attack is reported as alleged by Palestinian sources,
when it would seem that having personally witnessed the aftermath he or she would be able to personally state what had obviously happened. The Israelis can say that the car was carrying a bomb and that it the case is shut. Arabs just don't count for shit and thats about the size of it.

Filer