Skip to content or view screen version

9/11, 3/11, 7/7, All False Flags: Now 7/11 Terror

John Leonard | 13.07.2006 08:11 | Analysis | Anti-militarism | Terror War

Signs are that the Mumbai train bombing is a false flag terror operation to heat up the war of civilizations on the Muslim world and keep India in line.

July 11, 2006. Two months ago, some Hindu extremists blew
themselves up while making bombs, according to this story on GNN:

False-flag Hindutva terrorism uncovered in India?
Several activists of a Hindu extremist party were killed or injured in
the explosion.
The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) and Secular Citizen's
Forum reported it is a larger plot to "disrupt communal harmony and fan
anti-Muslim feelings," and said Hindu extremist leaders were
"running bomb-making units with the intent of fomenting communal
mayhem."
Hmm... Like with the 7/11 train blasts, for example?
And who put the Hindu extremists up to it, on 7/11 of all days? I was
kind of expecting an attack today! Ever wonder why the false-flag
terror crime network loves to play with mystical numbers?
The 11 signature goes all the way back to the grand-daddy of today's
false-flag terror ops -- the founding act of the Anglo-American empire,
Guy Fawkes Day, 11/5/5, 400 years ago in 1605.
Their little numerology game helps these psychopaths enjoy their work
and laugh at us mere mortals. They like to dare to show their hand a
little -- it's far more believable that military intelligence rather
than amateur Muslim radicals could pull off seven train bombings at
once. They sometimes have a sickly sense of humor too: they even picked
"Bombay" as the place to bomb.
Train bombings are their specialty -- as in the 1980 Bologna massacre
by the NATO countergang network Gladio, more recently Madrid 3/11, and
London 7/7.
It's the same old trick!
PART II. Yankee Doodle, blow it up!
More evidence comes in, closely following the classic pattern of
military intelligence provocation
July 12th.
CNN's report about the Bombay Train Bombing today nicely fits
the pattern of state-sponsored false flag terrorism:
* "No group has claimed responsibility for the blasts, which came in a span of 11
minutes." Anonymity is one of the most common traits of state-sponsored false flag hits --
for instance 9/11. Real terrorists do have demands. Sometimes the phony provocateurs will
take the trouble of inventing the name of a mythical new brigade without any members
and faxing a claim in to Al-Jazeera, the MI-6 channel. Today they didn't bother. The
US just telegraphed the names of their proxies to the media direct.
* The explosive used was "RDX, one of the most powerful kinds of military explosives."
Only the best -- and the easiest to get hold of for military intelligence.
* A sophisticated technical innovation was used: miniature timers hidden in
pencils. This is the kind of stuff that comes out of intelligence think tanks.
A good example was the anthrax attacks after 9/11.
* Officials admitted to advance knowledge of the attacks. Somebody must have
pencilled it in for them.
* US officials take the lead in assigning blame on their own countergangs,
Jaish-e-Muhammed and Lashkar-e-Tayyiba, or Taiba.
The Jaish-e-Muhammed is an asset of Pakistani military intelligence,
the ISI, which in turn is directly controlled by the CIA, down to the detail
of appointing its director. It had the job of eliminating overly inquisitive
WSJ reporter Daniel Pearl, who was investigating the ISI, reportedly on the
money trail leading from the ISI to Mohamed Atta and 9/11.
A "leader of the Jaish," Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheik, allegedly both kidnapped Pearl and
wired the $100,000 to Atta on behalf of the very Gen. Mahmoud who was meeting
with House Intelligence Committee chairmen on the morning of 9/11 in Washington.
"Lashkar-e-Taiba" is more obscure, and has been linked to the MI6. Contacts with
it were used to sheepdip the 7/7 patsies with a terrorist pedigree.
* Pakistani officials make statements supporting the blowback theory of
terrorism regarding an explicit link between Mumbai and Kashmir. These
puppets of Anglo-American imperialism are parroting the divide and conquer
propaganda of their paymasters.
Larry Chin covers this ISI connection in the Online Journal today,

"US intelligence ties to Mumbai 7/11". He sees the likely motive as an
attempt to derail the Indo-Pak peace process, which would devalue the military
card -- the last one the bankrupt USA still has to play, according to the
neocon fascist madmen in power.
It won't matter if the US owes China a trillion dollars, if there is a general
Asian war and China loses, they reckon. It wouldn't be the first time
Wall Street made money on a war. From day one, war profiteers made fortunes in this country
by speculating on Revolutionary banknotes.
Yankee Doodle, blow it up!

Author John Leonard is the publisher of 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in
USA
This article may be copied without permission, with attribution.

www.waronfreedom.org/bombay.html

John Leonard

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

Good greif!

13.07.2006 10:14

What has this site become!?

non fruitcake


heart and brow centres open

13.07.2006 11:54

"What has this site become!?"
Like most other places on the internet, where the nwo codes, and patternings of manipulative behaviour, have been recognised by an ever-increasing number of awakening people, a place to express that view.

dh


It's not unthinkable...

13.07.2006 11:56

I have no idea who was behind the attacks in Mumbai, however the possibility that a state agency is behind it has to be considered, after all, state terrorism, in the form of war, is clearly the biggest source of terror on the planet.

The WSWS, who are not a group who have even said that WTC7 (  http://wtc7.net/ ) was brought down by controlled demolition (when it's quite clear that it was -- they are really quite cautious), have said this on 11/7:

"It cannot be excluded that yesterday’s atrocity in Mumbai was organized or facilitated by agents provocateurs working for one of India’s intelligence agencies or that elements within the security forces allowed the terrorist attack to take place, with the aim of panicking the public into accepting increased repressive powers for the state. It is also possible that the Mumbai bombings were the work of Hindu supremacist fanatics bent on stoking up anti-Muslim violence."

 http://wsws.org/articles/2006/jul2006/terr-j12.shtml

I'm very dubious of any theory involving numerology, but to rule out the possibility of an intelligence agency being involved with this attack at this stage would be very naive.

cup cake


Numerology- you misunderstand

13.07.2006 14:54

Numerology exists, just as astrology exists- not as scientific theories, but as psychological phenomena.

FACT: Millions of people read their horoscopes, and no matter how looney, the behaviour patter of such a large group WILL have some consequences.

In a modern world, 'numerology' means the psychology of numbers. Mental magicians, for instance, learn vast amounts between the connection of the minds of ordinary people, and their relationship to specific numbers and number patterns.

How many times do you see ads on TV where numbers dance, or glow, or are given some other emphasis. Now, of course, this is an attempt to get you to notice the number, or associate it with something, but the particular numbers chosen affect how easily that will happen.

Or, let me put it another way. It is famously said that the full moon correlates with the occurence of certain types of crime. Does this mean we believe in the supernatural? OF COURSE NOT. But the Human mind is a curious thing, and criminals and the insane are often influnced by very strange external signs.

Blair's people also use numbers to re-inforce memes. Take 911. A date, but also the '999' number in the US, and also the '11' becomes the burning towers. Blair chose 911 as the ultimate LOGO.

It gets more interesting, though. Washington is a major centre of the 'occult'. Many powerful politicians and other elites are nutty to enough to demand constant 'readings' and treasure their 'special personal advisors' above all others. Shades of Rasputin? Well, only if you multiply the nuttiness of early 20th century Russia by a million.

Now, what do you think happens when a genocidal maniac like Blair is able to take advantage of the superstition-ridden clowns at the top of the US administration? Blair understands the advantages that come from using the psychological weaknesses found both in general populations, and individual members of the elite. All great monsters do.

Now the big question is "does Blair believe in dark magic, or does he just pretend in order to build empathy with the loonies he seeks to control?". You do know that this was previously the big question about Adolf Hitler, and the nazi fascination with 'occult' activities?

Does it matter? Serial killers very often also use numbers, or other strange patterns of behaviour. The detectives that seek to capture them before they murder again DON'T BELIEVE IN NUMEROLOGY, but they know their killer may well do, and this is all that concerns them.

When a magician says 'think of a number', he/she is far too cynical to believe in anything but the susceptibility of the Human mind. However, the magician will exploit the psychological power of certain numbers to the max, AND SO DOES BLAIR.

twilight


Deja Vu

14.07.2006 20:40

"it's quite clear that it was"

Prove it then. On you go. Explain EXACTLY why you're 100% sure.

Architect


The conspiracy theory behind 7/11

15.05.2007 09:45

There is a pattern to be observed. Every time India and Pakistan decide to sit down and negotiate, a blast comes out of the blue. The latest instance was the blast in the train that was headed to Pakistan. It would by no means be far-fetched to state that coincidence can be ruled out. A careful observation of circumstances spanning the past seven to eight years would make this evident.
Now to tackle the why of this situation. If India and Pakistan are left to themselves this would not have happened. Unfortunately there are too many crocodiles in the lurk. They need to boost the economy by selling arms, dumping sophisticated military weapons, escalating a arms race and so on. It would be untrue to state that these two neighbouring countries do not want peace. It would however, be true to state that these two countries are independent only on paper and their behavior towards one another is heavily constrained by foreign powers.

Venkatesh Raghavan
mail e-mail: venkatesh.raghavan@lionrbidge.com