Hindus are not suicide bombers.
Sikhs are not suicide bombers.
Jews are not suicide bombers.
Afro-Carribeans are not suicide bombers(notable exception of Lindsay German and Richard Reid both Muslim converts).
4 Muslim suicide bombers killed 52 innocent people last year.
How is it racist to concentrate on the threat in order to defend your citizens?

YOURS IS A RACIST DEFINITION OF THE THREAT

 http://PAKI.TV

Islamic suide bombers are by definition Muslims, pointing that out does not make someone a rascist! In any case Muslims are a multi ethnic group so racism against them is impossible. Wake up please and smell the coffee!

"In any case Muslims are a multi ethnic group so racism against them is impossible."

Jews too are a multi ethnic group. I'm sure Arthur would have a word to describe discriminatory behaviour towards members of that group.

To be jewish is a race - fucking ignorant prick

Do you know how many people have been killed in Iraq? the biggest acts of terrorism are being committed by our governments. The acts of some muslim suicide bombers does not mean that it's ok to see all muslims as potential terrorists and discriminate against them! This article also seems to be missing the rather obvious fact that many muslims are arab, and reference in their literature the long history of western terrorism and political disruption against arab nations. So obviously, the targetting of muslims is blatently racism against arab people, a racism that also plays out in the war in Iraq and the current sanctions against Palestine.

Also, the campaign of hostility against muslims means that anyone who is "percieved" by racist attackers as muslim has been at risk of a racist backlash.

"To be jewish is a race - fucking ignorant prick"

Yes, and that would be why you get white, black, arab and asian jews.

The Encyclopedia Brittanica (1973)
'The Jews As A Race: The findings of physical anthropology show that, contrary to the popular view, there is no Jewish race. Anthropornetric measurements of Jewish groups in many parts of the world indicate that they differ greatly from one another with respect to all the important physical characteristics." (vol. 12, page 1054)

Collier's Encyclopedia (1977)
"A common error and persistent modern myth is the designation of the Jews as a 'race! This is scientifically fallacious, from the standpoint of both physical and historical tradition. Investigations by anthropologists have shown that Jews are by no means uniform in physical character and that they nearly always reflect the physical and mental characteristics of the people among whom they live" (Collier's Encyclopedia, 1977, vol. 13, p. 573).

Encyclopedia Americana (1986)
"Racial and Ethnic Considerations. Some theorists have considered the Jews a distinct race, although this has no factual basis. In every country in which the Jews lived for a considerable time, their physical traits came to approximate those of the indigenous people. Hence the Jews belong to several distinct racial types, ranging, for example, from fair to dark. Among the reasons for this phenomenon are voluntary or involuntary miscegenation and the conversion of Gentiles to Judaism" (Encyclopedia Americana, 1986, vol. 16, p. 71).

Try again - the ad hominems are as meaningless as the intervention.

Jews were already covered by existing racial discrimination legislation, which is why the religious discrimination law, Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 act, was really introduced, to give Muslims equal protection as other self-identifying clans from discrimination. I'm not sure if I was a rationalist-humanist I can still legally disciminate towards atheists and against anyone who had any religious belief regardless of their personal chosen mythology.

Of course Jews aren't a race. All races are mythical constructs from an age when we drowned witches to prove their innocence. All racial theory is nazi nonsense, we are a million tribes of a thousand colours and we've all interbred at least twice. The fact that the law recognises racial theory at all only highlights the law is an ass. The fact that anti-semitism is a crime that applies to only some semites, and that this is a term the nazis invented and their victims perpetuated only adds to the silliness.

Israel and Iran are the only countries in the world that guarantee at least one Jewish representative.

BBC Radio 4 'Any Answers', Saturday 15 July 2006

Was the R4 Any Answers 'Kumar' related to the BBC's Indian creation?

'Kumar' was given unrestricted say by presenter Nick Clarke who let the not reference to Pakistan to go unchallenged. Nor did Clarke challenge 'Kumar' on any of the other factual inaccuracies.

It seems the BBC is now operated on the agenda that so long as innocent people being maligned on these programmes in these very sneaky, creepy ways are Muslims then it is okay.

Has there been any examination of how the Nazis perpetrated their lies against THIER targets?


In fact Nick Clarke also allowed 'Kumar' to describe Palestinians, Kahsmiris and other Muslim self-defence activists as 'another' 'Nazi' grouping!

Where will the BBC's naked breaches of all codes of journalism and ethics end?