The Yorkshire Ripper Cover Up
Peter Newman | 28.06.2006 21:41 | Analysis | Sheffield
After twenty-five years of living a lie, it's very difficult for the people of Leeds and Bradford to admit that Peter Sutcliffe is NOT the Yorkshire Ripper. The Yorkshire Ripper was never caught and is still killing our women right now. This game of pretending is a betrayal of every woman in England.
------------------------------------------------------------------
THE YORKSHIRE RIPPER COVER UP
------------------------------------------------------------------
Ten years ago I came across an advertisement for a book titled "The
Real Yorkshire Ripper" by a man called Noel O'Gara. It was 1996 and
I was living temporarily at the time in Chapeltown, Leeds, which had
been the hub of the Yorkshire Ripper investigation.
I was bewildered by Mr O'Gara's advertisement. Like everyone else
in Leeds, I had automatically assumed that the West Yorkshire Police
had been telling us the truth and that the newspapers had been telling
us the truth when they said Peter Sutcliffe is the Yorkshire Ripper and
that therefore the case was closed and our worries were over.
I resolved to read Mr Noel O'Gara's book, first in the Reference
Section of the Central Library in Leeds, to which Mr O'Gara had
donated a copy, and then afterwards I was quick to get my own copy of
this very important document.
The Yorkshire Ripper cover up is a complex subject. As if it were not
bad enough already, a further complication has been introduced this
year, 2006, by the bizarre trial and conviction of a vulnerable
alcoholic John Humble as the 'hoaxer' who supposedly was
responsible for the letters and tape which the West Yorkshire Police
said were definitely the work of the Yorkshire Ripper at the height of
the furore in 1979. What I can say for sure about John Humble, having
listened repeatedly to recordings of his voice alongside recordings of
the voice on the Yorkshire Ripper tape of 1979 - is that John
Humble's voice is NOT the voice on the Ripper tape and that John
Humble has been framed. This is obvious to anyone who just does a bit
of homework. And that explains the sparse, low-key media coverage of
the John Humble fiasco.
Readers of this article will probably be new to the subject of the
Yorkshire Ripper cover up, or else will consider themselves to be well
informed on the matter in their belief that there is no cover up, and
that Peter Sutcliffe is the Yorkshire Ripper, and that the only problem
around here is that the West Yorkshire Police took a long time to
apprehend Peter Sutcliffe.
The truth is much more complex. The reason the West Yorkshire Police
took so long to catch Peter Sutcliffe is that Peter Sutcliffe has a
different blood type to the Yorkshire Ripper and therefore Peter
Sutcliffe is NOT the Yorkshire Ripper. Peter Sutcliffe murdered about
four women in the north of England during 1975-1980. By a bizarre
confluence of events, Sutcliffe's activities took place at just the
same time as another, much more intelligent and much more cunning
serial killer also began killing women in the Yorkshire area.
There are indications that the REAL Yorkshire Ripper was well aware of
Peter Sutcliffe's amateurish attacks on women in the north of
England, and decided to play him and the police off against one
another, to confuse the police all the more and to cover his tracks.
The REAL Yorkshire Ripper was clearly an extremely evil and intelligent
and cunning man, who knew he was the intellectual superior of the
police and who took a delight in tormenting the police by confusing and
tantalising them. The appearance of the amateurish, idiotic woman-hater
Peter Sutcliffe on the scene around 1975 was a bonus for the REAL
Yorkshire Ripper, who exploited the situation to torment the police all
the more. In the end, the REAL Yorkshire Ripper drove Assistant Chief
Constable George Oldfield into an early grave.
The whole truth about the Yorkshire Ripper fiasco is so complex that it
cannot be covered in an article of this size. What I can do now is to
refer you to the following links for further information on this
amazing subject which raises important questions about our collective
human psychology and which holds out great educational and healing
opportunities to the entire global human family if we will face up to
all the facts and implications of this amazing case.
=====================================================
=====================================================
====================================================
Noel O'Gara's uniquely definitive site on the Yorkshire Ripper case
http://www.yorkshireripper.co.uk
Thoughts on the Ripper Humble Case
http://groups.google.ie/group/uk.local.geordie/browse_frm/thread/09f8...
Arrest / Press Conference / False Smiles
http://yorkshireripper.com/arrest.htm
A Police Corruption Scandal of Unprecedented Proportions
http://groups.google.ie/group/soc.culture.irish/browse_frm/thread/42c...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Killings have not stopped
http://yorkshireripper.com/sundaytimes.htm
http://www.yorkshireripper.co.uk/hyper/win-005.htm
http://www.yorkshireripper.com/aftermath.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE YORKSHIRE RIPPER COVER UP
------------------------------------------------------------------
Ten years ago I came across an advertisement for a book titled "The
Real Yorkshire Ripper" by a man called Noel O'Gara. It was 1996 and
I was living temporarily at the time in Chapeltown, Leeds, which had
been the hub of the Yorkshire Ripper investigation.
I was bewildered by Mr O'Gara's advertisement. Like everyone else
in Leeds, I had automatically assumed that the West Yorkshire Police
had been telling us the truth and that the newspapers had been telling
us the truth when they said Peter Sutcliffe is the Yorkshire Ripper and
that therefore the case was closed and our worries were over.
I resolved to read Mr Noel O'Gara's book, first in the Reference
Section of the Central Library in Leeds, to which Mr O'Gara had
donated a copy, and then afterwards I was quick to get my own copy of
this very important document.
The Yorkshire Ripper cover up is a complex subject. As if it were not
bad enough already, a further complication has been introduced this
year, 2006, by the bizarre trial and conviction of a vulnerable
alcoholic John Humble as the 'hoaxer' who supposedly was
responsible for the letters and tape which the West Yorkshire Police
said were definitely the work of the Yorkshire Ripper at the height of
the furore in 1979. What I can say for sure about John Humble, having
listened repeatedly to recordings of his voice alongside recordings of
the voice on the Yorkshire Ripper tape of 1979 - is that John
Humble's voice is NOT the voice on the Ripper tape and that John
Humble has been framed. This is obvious to anyone who just does a bit
of homework. And that explains the sparse, low-key media coverage of
the John Humble fiasco.
Readers of this article will probably be new to the subject of the
Yorkshire Ripper cover up, or else will consider themselves to be well
informed on the matter in their belief that there is no cover up, and
that Peter Sutcliffe is the Yorkshire Ripper, and that the only problem
around here is that the West Yorkshire Police took a long time to
apprehend Peter Sutcliffe.
The truth is much more complex. The reason the West Yorkshire Police
took so long to catch Peter Sutcliffe is that Peter Sutcliffe has a
different blood type to the Yorkshire Ripper and therefore Peter
Sutcliffe is NOT the Yorkshire Ripper. Peter Sutcliffe murdered about
four women in the north of England during 1975-1980. By a bizarre
confluence of events, Sutcliffe's activities took place at just the
same time as another, much more intelligent and much more cunning
serial killer also began killing women in the Yorkshire area.
There are indications that the REAL Yorkshire Ripper was well aware of
Peter Sutcliffe's amateurish attacks on women in the north of
England, and decided to play him and the police off against one
another, to confuse the police all the more and to cover his tracks.
The REAL Yorkshire Ripper was clearly an extremely evil and intelligent
and cunning man, who knew he was the intellectual superior of the
police and who took a delight in tormenting the police by confusing and
tantalising them. The appearance of the amateurish, idiotic woman-hater
Peter Sutcliffe on the scene around 1975 was a bonus for the REAL
Yorkshire Ripper, who exploited the situation to torment the police all
the more. In the end, the REAL Yorkshire Ripper drove Assistant Chief
Constable George Oldfield into an early grave.
The whole truth about the Yorkshire Ripper fiasco is so complex that it
cannot be covered in an article of this size. What I can do now is to
refer you to the following links for further information on this
amazing subject which raises important questions about our collective
human psychology and which holds out great educational and healing
opportunities to the entire global human family if we will face up to
all the facts and implications of this amazing case.
=====================================================
=====================================================
====================================================
Noel O'Gara's uniquely definitive site on the Yorkshire Ripper case
http://www.yorkshireripper.co.uk Thoughts on the Ripper Humble Case
http://groups.google.ie/group/uk.local.geordie/browse_frm/thread/09f8... Arrest / Press Conference / False Smiles
http://yorkshireripper.com/arrest.htm A Police Corruption Scandal of Unprecedented Proportions
http://groups.google.ie/group/soc.culture.irish/browse_frm/thread/42c... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Killings have not stopped
http://yorkshireripper.com/sundaytimes.htm http://www.yorkshireripper.co.uk/hyper/win-005.htm http://www.yorkshireripper.com/aftermath.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Newman
Comments
Display the following 25 comments