Skip to content or view screen version

World Trade Center Destruction Was Controlled Demolition - Now there's PROOF

Jacob Hamblin | 20.06.2006 02:44 | Anti-militarism | Sheffield

The following is an article posted to the Portland IMC
on June 17, 2006 (with the addition of his source).
It tells of the discovery (proof) that the Trade Center
buildings were brought down by a controlled demolition
on 9/11. He provides a link to his source at the bottom
of this article.

 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

************************************************************

BYU Physics Prof Finds Thermate in WTC Physical Samples, Building Collapses an Inside Job

By Jacob Hamblin

Based on chemical analysis of WTC structural steel residue, a Brigham Young University physics professor has identified the material as Thermate. Thermate is the controlled demolition explosive thermite plus sulfur. Sulfur causes the thermite to burn hotter, cutting steel quickly and leaving trails of yellow colored residue.

Prof. Steven Jones, who conducted his PhD research at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and post-doctoral research at Cornell University and the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility, has analyised materials from the WTC and has detected the existence of thermate, used for "cutting" the steel support columns...........

Dr. Jones is a co-founder of Scholars for 911 Truth.

Dr. Jones in earlier work pointed to thermate as the likely explosive that brought down the WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 skyscrapers. But only recently was physical material analysed in the lab and the presense of thermate announced. The samples were provided Dr. Jones' team from redundant sourses.

Both BYU and Prof. Jones have been offered additional grants if he would "change the direction" of his research. In addition, there have been threats made by an individual who "is taking action" to stop Steven Jones' research, specifically his experiment with thermites (aluminothermics), on the grounds his work may be helpful to "terrorists". Jones notes that much more detailed information on both thermite and thermate is readily available on the internet.

The source...... .was an audio interview of Dr. Steven Jones by Alex Jones (no relation). I understand the interview took place at the Chicago 911 Truth Conference earlier this month. The whole interview is of interest. Alex Jones comes off slightly as the radio "shock jocky", maybe a little to often interrupts the academic for the sake of ostensible radio drama. Dr. Jones comes off as a prudent scientist valuing accuracy over sound bite drama. But that's just my take. Listen to the whole short interview. Jones also discusses his sources for the WTC samples. I hope I have linked it adaquately, as I am cybernetically slow as well as a horrid speller.

 http://www.prisonplanet.tv/articles/june2006/160606jones.htm

Jacob Hamblin

Additions

Clarification

20.06.2006 05:27

 hardevidence@gmail.com

Just a quick clarification: As I said in my talk at the Chicago conference, and in my remarks to Alex Jones, the results so far on the analysis of the previously-molten metal samples are PRELIMINARY. I emphasized that, in fact.

The samples are predominantly iron, so we can rule out the 'molten aluminum' hypothesis with a high degree of confidence. There is very little chromium, so that the 'molten structural steel' hypothesis is highly suspect. Yes, there is sulfur -- but proving the use of 'thermate' positively will certainly require further analyses and comparisons with samples of known origin (such as thermate-products). And that analysis takes a lot of time, unfortunately. Patience is a virtue.

Steven E. Jones


Video of Steven Jones Interview

20.06.2006 11:39

Here is the video that the above report is based on, it's also available on Google Video.

repost
- Homepage: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2842384983834100001


Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

No doubt ...

20.06.2006 07:39

Professor Jones will publish his results in a peer reviewed journal.

sceptic


Copyright Infringement?

20.06.2006 23:46


Now I don't approve of copyright.....
but might IndyMedia get stung for displaying the full text of an article from a protected publication?
I suppose it depends on how good/expensive your lawyer is.

Thanks for the read though.
Some of them conspiraloons sound at least as dangerous as those already in charge.

Suggest the 'comment' from "repost" is hidden .

And sommat like....

"An Unholy Union of Science and Politcs"
Article from The Chronicle of Higher Education:

Academics give a scholarly stamp to 9/11 conspiracy theories

By JOHN GRAVOIS

Chicago
 http://chronicle.com/temp/reprint.php?id=j2dll9sp4mf4rtkp62dhg6yxsm3jt43c

in its place.


twopercenthuman