Remove this racist drivel

Read the comment to Latuff above (using a cowardly nym as always, rather than sticking to a single nym, so that his/her pattern of comments can be observed). Now ask yourself why Indymedia attracts so many foul racists posting in favour of EVERY ISRAELI CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.

The answer is simple. These people are tasked to disrupt news coverage about the crimes of Israel. Their homes are the various ultra-right-wing pro-Israel sites that cover the internet, sites where comments like mine are eliminated immediately, and racist comment against muslims flows like water. They are the people that attack palestinian works of art, and pay to drag that infamous bomb destroyed Israel bus to anywhere in the US where people are attempting to get justice for the Palestinian people. In other words, they act EXACTLY THE SAME as nazi supporters did during the rise to power of Adolf Hitler.

REMEMBER THAT ISRAEL DOESN'T JUST MURDER WOMEN, CHILDREN, DOCTORS, PEACE-ACTIVISTS ETC- it watches and records the murders on the finest optical systems US taxpayers money can buy, so that the snuff movies can be enjoyed endlessly afterwards.

Israel is not barbaric by accident, it is barbaric by design. Why? Because when you take land from other humans by mass-rape, mass-torture, and mass-murder, you are destined to follow the same inhuman logic for as long as significant remnants of your original victim class remain.

Worse, because Israel PRETENDS to be part of the civilised West, it understands that this pretence, if taken seriously, absolutely REQUIRES the punishment of every Israel crime against humanity, the dismantling of the racist state of Israel, and the creation of non-racist states in its place. Of this there is no doubt.

Israel understands that its very survival REQUIRES the destruction of every civilised value that the West pays lip service to. If the UK and US become vastly greater offenders against all of Man's laws on a regular and every increasing basis, Israel is of the hook. How did WW2 get started? By this exact same thinking. More and more criminal regimes deciding that THEY wanted all 'restricting' laws removed.

What happens when Israel and Bush and Blair (or more accurately, just Blair) are able to say that the moral values of Mankind are nothing but a problem? What happens when Blair succeeds in the argument that leadership (ie HIS LEADERSHIP) means that we allow all moral judgements to be made by the leader himself, and ONLY by the leader? Why do you think that for much of European history the church DEMANDED that all the sheep accept that the power of leaders was GOD GIVEN?

When morality flows from the people, and that morality is NOT a 'master-race' doctrine as seen with the tribe of Israel, there will be NO CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. When so-called morality becomes the same as any other order from the leader (how ever that leader is appointed), or 'morality' has any racist 'master-race' dimension (as seen in every aspect of all colonial histories), CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY BECOME INEVITABLE.

You see me post endlessly in defense of the muslims. However *I* have no formal religion, and consider all organised religion evil in intent and consequence. The only human structures we should MORALLY respect are 1) ourselves 2) family and friends (and friends are NOT defined as members of the same tribe) 3) the Human Race. My defense of the muslims today is for the same reason I would have defended jews pre-WW2, namely because those that are currently attacking muslims in ANY way are attempting to fracture the agreed morality that flows naturally from ordinary people, in order to make possible the racist extermination of massive numbers of humans.

When Hitler murdered jews, and Israel murders Palestinians, they both did/do so with the same thought- "what the hell, in a few years OUR people will reproduce, and the dead will soon be replaced". From this, you should understand that normal morality plays no part in the thinking of those we put into power. Power is actually the very opposite of morality. The whole idea behind the birth of modern 'democracy' was that the mechanisms of democracy would force our politicians to respect the moral requirements of ordinary Humans. No more "if god put this person in charge, then your leader's order are god's orders".

Well that point is a joke. The church didn't die with the birth of modern democracy, it just modified its evil gameplan. Bush ***IS*** god's appointed man according to vast numbers of Americans. Ireland got its democratic 'freedom' from Britain just so that it could allow the catholic church there full ability to abuse women and children in ways beyond the dreams of the very worst ordinary sex criminals (this is the culture Bono and Geldolf come from- any wonder they give such massive support to Blair and Bush).

Here's the point. We may choose to be good- very, very good- as individuals. However, we are NOT just individuals, we are also part of greater human systems. If somehow, evil is distilled from us, even when our individual lives are blameless, WE ARE STILL RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT EVIL. Hitler rose to power, with the support of a people that can be PROVED to be mostly comprised of very moral individuals. I am willing to bet that, taken on average, the people of pre-WW2 nazi Germany were much more decent people than those of the UK or US today.

Now, perhaps, you understand why so many New Reich agents hang around here. They can safely state that the purpose of Indymedia is to promote campaigns that effectively allow 'liberals' to prove to themselves that they are 'good' people, while NEVER, EVER challenging the evil done in our name by a POWER-ELITE preparing for future acts of GENOCIDE beginning with Iran.

"Support Greenpeace, and support 'our boys' in Iraq" they say.
"Support gay-rights, and support the police" they say.
"Oppose nuclear-power, and support Blair's actions against muslims" they say.

HITLER ENCOURAGED INDIVIDUAL GERMANS TO ENGAGE IN 'GOOD-CAUSES'. There is a powerful psychological game played by Blair's people here in EXACTLY the same vein.

I am full aware that Blair's people high within the Indymedia network attack people such as myself for my laser-like focus on the crimes of Blair, and those that support him. I am aware that non-Blair people high within the Indymedia network are puzzled by the demands that people such as myself are banned, either directly, or my changes in posting rules, or mechanisms that allow comments to be shown.

Blair's New Reich agents want Indymedia UK to become a nazi-era good-cause, conscience-salving operation for naive 'liberals'. Of course, as Blair's crimes rapidly multiply, it becomes harder and harder for Blair's agents to win their arguments. They don't expect to win in the end (when the time comes, Blair will simply use pure power to deal with the problem of comment from people such as myself). They are simply buying time for their master.

Anyway, we started with the vile actions of Israel. Sadly, the atrocity on the beach, and the atrocity used to murder doctors from a children's clinic in Gaza, are too trivial to worry about given other factors. The real question is what was Blair arranging during his meetings with the highest ranking Israeli terrorists. Blair is going to GENOCIDE Iran. I understand that the absolute horror of this fact simply numbs the minds of those that know they should be thinking about this.

The people of nazi Germany were aware of Hitler's war plans. They dealt with the numbing horror of things like the potential attack against Poland in the same way that you all deal with the coming war with Iran. By listening carefully to Hitler's own media in order to prove to themselves the thousands of problems and obstacles that Hitler could never overcome, or dare risk.

There is a greater possibility that you will wake up tomorrow and discover that WW2 never happened, than Blair won't attack Iran if he remains in power (and he IS going to remain in power). The fact that an Iran War is unlike anything seen since WW2, and has all kinds of difficulties and consequences, is true but relevant only in the sense that Blair has to rely on his exponentially growing momentum to get the deed done.

Blair's allies all accept the fact of the Iran War, but that doesn't mean any of them are all that enthusiastic to put themselves in the front-line during the initial stages. Put another way, Italy was a solid ally of Hitler, up until the moment he ever needed any real help from them.

-Israel wants to benefit from the Iran War, not be the cause of it.
-The US military planners wants proof that there is a political plan that makes sense to handle the aftermath of an Iran attack.
-The French and Germans want the US to do all the dirty work, so that a European army can safely stroll into the Middle-East.
-The Chinese only want action if it is of the most extreme and ruthless variety, with Europe taking fast, permanent possession of the entire oil producing areas of the Middle-East.
-Russia wants proof that regardless of the form the war takes, it gets a significant reward to look the other way.
-US Neocons want assurances that they will get full backing if they need to take control of the US by force.

Blair doesn't worry too much. His aim is that the pressure on all of the above ratchets ever higher day-by-day. The extension of the Iranian empire into Afghanistan and Iraq will ultimately allow his strategy of painting Iran as an ever growing threat to win out, even against the paradox that it was Blair that gave Iran power in Afghanistan and Iraq in the first place.

Remember, the phoney negotiations with the Serbs, Afghans and Iraqis marked the final moments before attack and invasion. We are now in that final stage with Iran.

If I condemn the Israeli murder and maiming of an innocent and unarmed Palestinian family, having a picnic on a beach, how does that make me a racist? Since when did Nazi's abhor crimes against humanity?

I took the 'Welcome to Nazymedia / Remove this racist drivel " post to be self-referencing racist dribble. How else can it be explained ? It is racist to criticise the IDF for massacring civilians ? Then it must be racist to criticise Germany for the concentration camps too ? I guess it's the same zionist who always uses the term Nazymedia and I personally would delete all those posts, they contribute nothing of intellect.

However, Latuff, while sometimes droll and cutting, often falls short of his own high standards especially when he is reacting to the most recent appalling acts. You can be too outraged to be creative. I think he and the Palestinians would be better served by reposting only his better cartoons rather than his entire catalogue. Besides, the Iraq reference in the post only highlights Latuffs failure to tackle the genocide in Iraq.

I like Latuff, and first heard of him here, but whoever is posting him, do him a favour and be more selective.