Who We All Truly Are



We are live women or men. We are live de-jure free-will full-liability natural-born private free women or free men, also known as any of them in accord with the Coronation oath of Elizabeth the Second, also known as a ministers in accord with (but not in subjection to) section 176.1 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Free men and women (even the king or queen) are equal in rights according to common law.



We are not PERSONS (though the GOVERNMENT and COURTS would like to think you are). PERSONS are incorporated legal fictions, also known as the STRAWMAN. You are not INCORPORATED CORPORATE CHATTEL (a PERSON) or a TRADE NAME SLAVE (a PERSON) or a DEAD LIMITED LIABILITY PUBLIC PERSON or OFFICER (a PERSON) or a TAXPAYER (a PERSON), all of which are LEGAL FICTIONS and are dead. We are live women or men.



In the famous PERSONS case Emily Murphy and her ilk proclaimed all women were PERSONS in the law and most women and men assumed this made women equal to men (they always were equal in true fact). The truth was that this ruling had the effect of making nearly everyone assume that they were all PERSONS (see PERSON in the definitions section near the bottom of this page). This assumption gives the governments and corporations tacit consent to treat ignorant women and men as chattel or slaves. The police magistrate courts have since been shelved (Emily Murphy was the first woman to become a police magistrate judge in the commonwealth). PERSONS are bought and sold in CANADA in accord with the Canadian Ownership Control and Determination Act.



The courts we face today are corporate bodies, private law merchant courts under Admiralty or maritime law or civil law and run by the Bank of England. Since the Dominion of Canada went into receivership in 1933, CANADA is held in receivership by the Bank of Canada, which controlled by the Rothschild family owned Bank of England in the CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF LONDON or The CROWN, which is also known as the CAPITAL CITY, the Square Mile, or THE CITY. There are two CROWNS, one is held by Elizabeth Mary Alexandra of the Windsor-Mountbatten family acting as HER MAJESTY ELIZABETH II, and the other is THE CITY, which, though it is the financial master or creditor of the debtor HER MAJESTY, is not the military or ecclesiastical master of HER MAJESTY.



The CROWN, a 677 acre independent sovereign nation in the centre of London England located on the site of the ancient Roman city of Londinium, is the centre of world finance and is also controlled by illuminati bankers.



The government of CANADA and the courts are DE FACTO. A DE FACTO government comes into, or remains in, power by means not provided for in the country?s common law or constitution, such as coup d?etat, revolution, usurpation, abrogation or suspension of the de jure lawful constitution. Since the illegal authority of these courts is corporate or civil, these corporate merchant maritime Admiralty courts of the bankrupt corporation must have our consent to proceed against us legally (the Maxim of Law = contract is the law).



They try to obtain our consent in many ways.



One common way is to approach the average John Doe and present him with a piece of paper containing an altered form of the name John Doe such as Doe, John or JOHN DOE or DOE, JOHN or DOE, John. They then ask Jon Doe if he is Doe, John or JOHN DOE or DOE, JOHN or DOE, John. These form or bastardizations of his name only appear to be John Doe?s name, but the average ignorant Jon Doe usually ignorantly consents that this is his name. What John Doe does not know is that the only lawful way to write one?s name (according to Legal Forms and Styles for Canada) is first name first middle name middle, family name last, first letter in each name in upper case and the rest in lower case (John Doe). The other presented forms of writing names are reserved for military operations or corporations. Once John consents to the idea that his name is one of these corporate or military forms he ignorantly assigns himself by tacit consent the status of a dead (or incorporated, from corpse) legal fiction known as a PERSON, and has given himself up as chattel with the status of salvage from a decommissioned or abandoned warship (CANADA is an incorporated legal fiction with the status of a decommissioned or abandoned British warship under Admiralty or maritime jurisdiction). Poor John Doe has ignorantly given up his birthright as a live man and child of the Creator and has assigned himself the status of a STRAWMAN, which is another name for PERSON, along with chattel (which comes from cattle).



The only lawful place to put our name in all capitals is on our gravestones, because there our bodies are actually incorporated (corpses) or a dead PERSONS and not the whole men or women or souls, our spirits are gone and all that is left is the shells or the vessels.



Once John Doe gives consent to being DOE, JOHN or some other corporate form of his name, poor ignorant John Doe then is unwittingly in the corporate or civil realm and is under the jurisdiction of the DE FACTO corporate government (liable to pay DE FACTO corporate taxes as a TAXPAYER which is also a PERSON) and the DE FACTO corporate merchant courts of the CROWN. If anyone changes your name for financial purposes or some other benefit that is a criminal offence known as fraud (cc.380). Another thing that poor ignorant John Doe does not know is that the CROWN through it?s legal BAR franchises has a global monopoly on fraud (In 1870 the Rothschild banking family founded American Bar Association in Indiana).



If John Doe hires a lawyer and becomes a client of that lawyer who is sworn to the CROWN via the BAR association John Doe in his ignorance proclaims to the world that he is incapable of conducting his own affairs in law and that may be interpreted by the treasonous merchant courts as a sign of John Doe stepping into the jurisdiction of those same corporate maritime admiralty courts. If John Doe merely steps foot in the courtroom that may be interpreted by the treasonous merchant courts as a sign of John Doe stepping into the jurisdiction of those same corporate maritime admiralty courts. If John Doe rises when the judge enters the room that may be interpreted by the treasonous merchant courts as a sign of John Doe stepping into the jurisdiction of those same corporate maritime admiralty courts. If John Doe enters a plea other than non assumpsit without prejudice or without prejudice I undertake no plea that may be interpreted by the treasonous merchant courts as a sign of John Doe stepping into the jurisdiction of those same corporate maritime admiralty courts. If John Doe answers any questions from the court clerk, prosecutor or judge at all that may be interpreted by the treasonous merchant courts as a sign of John Doe stepping into the jurisdiction of those same corporate maritime admiralty courts (one should always answer any questions from anyone attempting to exercise questionable authority with a question, because the master questions whereas the slave answers).



It would be best for John Doe to not have anything at all to do with the illegal DE FACTO corporate merchant courts. The judge knows full well he is not presiding over a lawful court, but a private law merchant court run by the Bank of England.



We free woman or men, ministers of Yehovah, who are in a state of awareness will not attempt to disprove the cases that corporate POLICE OFFICERS attempt to present against us using the laws of mammon in the lying evil fascist bastard?s illegitimate, fraudulent and unlawful DE FACTO KANGAROO COURTS. This would legitimize the court?s supposed jurisdiction and the fraudulent laws of the lying evil fascist bastards, it would make us all parties to fraud.



The lying evil fascist bastards are attempting to CONVICT us (or convince us), in illegitimate, fraudulent and unlawful DE FACTO KANGAROO COURTS.



What we do first to fight for our freedom is to challenge in writing the assumed jurisdiction of the lying evil fascist bastard?s illegitimate, fraudulent and unlawful DE FACTO KANGAROO COURTS to proceed against us while attempting enforcement of their fraudulent DE FACTO CIVIL LAWS.



We submit Demand Notices to the sovereign de jure live free-will full-liability natural-born private free women or free men who charged us and/or attempting to prosecute us in their capacity as fraudulent CORPORATE CHATTEL or INCORPORATED TRADE NAME SLAVES or DEAD ?LIMITED LIABILITY? PUBLIC PERSONS & OFFICERS (a.k.a. LEGAL FICTIONS).



We start off by sending Demand Notices to the lying evil fascist bastards and their lackeys, not their capacity as fraudulent CORPORATE CHATTEL or INCORPORATED TRADE NAME SLAVES or DEAD ?LIMITED LIABILITY? PUBLIC PERSONS & OFFICERS (a.k.a. LEGAL FICTIONS), but in their capacity as sovereign de jure live free-will full-liability natural-born private free women or free men (a.k.a. ?any of them? or minister). This blows the lying evil fascist bastard?s minds because they are not used to anyone dealing with them in any capacity other than fraudulent CORPORATE CHATTEL or INCORPORATED TRADE NAME SLAVES or DEAD ?LIMITED LIABILITY? PUBLIC PERSONS & OFFICERS (a.k.a. LEGAL FICTIONS). They are not used to anyone dealing with them in any forum of law but their illegitimate, fraudulent and unlawful DE FACTO KANGAROO COURTS.



Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate power.
- Benito Mussolini, 1883-1945, Fascist dictator of Italy



Serving the lying evil fascist bastards Notices as sovereign de jure live free-will full-liability natural-born private free women or free men (a.k.a. ?any of them? or minister) removes them from the jurisdiction of their illegitimate, fraudulent and unlawful DE FACTO KANGAROO COURTS (the ?Temples of Baal?) and brings them into the de jure lawful jurisdiction of our Creator (a.k.a. Yehovah the parent of Yeshuah the Christ).



The lying evil fascist bastards must then recognise the de jure supremacy of our Creator (Yehovah the parent of Yeshuah the Christ) in the law. They must recognise our de jure full rights as de jure live free-will full-liability natural-born private free women or free men (a.k.a. ?any of them? or minister). If they do not do so they commit fraud, obstruction of justice, and treason (and other crimes as well).



De jure live free-will full-liability natural-born private free women or free men (a.k.a. ?any of them? or minister) can lawfully have and use the de jure gifts of our Creator (a.k.a. Yehovah the parent of Yeshuah the Christ) any time he or she wills to do so.



Genesis 1:29 - And Adoni (Yehovah) said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed which is upon the face of all the earth



Usually the lying evil fascist bastards will then do whatever they can to get rid of your case as quickly as possible and get you out of their hair. The lying evil fascist bastards quite often drop their CASE to CONVICT you in their illegitimate, fraudulent and unlawful DE FACTO KANGAROO COURTS. Sometimes they will do almost anything in attempts to intimidate us into believing we are wrong.



If the lying evil fascist bastards do proceed to an attempt to bring us to trial in their illegitimate, fraudulent and unlawful DE FACTO KANGAROO COURTS, we then go before the lying evil fascist bastards and challenge them to prove if their DE FACTO KANGAROO COURT has any right to proceed against you. So long as we do not surrender ourselves into their jurisdiction willingly or by ignorance, they will fail to prove any jurisdiction over us every time. The truth is the lying evil fascist bastards have no jurisdiction over de jure live free-will full-liability natural-born private free women or free men (a.k.a. ?any of them? or ministers).



No jurisdiction = no trial? = no conviction!



If they do unlawfully force or ?railroad? us through the TRIAL anyway, first we must refuse to speak except to say only that we ask them to establish that they have jurisdiction to proceed against us by explaining their oath, who are they sworn to and the meaning of their oath, whether whomever they are sworn to has a oath and what the meaning of the oath of who they are sworn to is, and whether whomever they are sworn to is allegiant to Yehovah the Creator and God spoken of in the King James Bible. We must answer every request or offer they make to us with a question demanding that they would they establish they have any jurisdiction over us by confirming their Oaths in the manner we need satisfied before we can proceed. They will often lie to us, yell at us, threaten to lock us up, and do anything they can to get us to answer their questions (if we do answer their questions they might claim we have ignorantly given them tacit consent that they have jurisdiction over us). If we do talk to them then only answer their questions with our own questions about their lack of jurisdiction. Then once their fraudulent TRIAL is over we can defeat any "illegal" CONVICTION merely by refusing to sign (or MARK) the JUDGE'S ORDER against us.



No jurisdiction = no trial? = no conviction!



This is the Maxim of Law (see Definitions below). If there is no CORPORATE contract with the JUDGE and the illegitimate, fraudulent and unlawful DE FACTO KANGAROO COURTS then they have no jurisdiction over us.



No jurisdiction - no trial? - no conviction!



We do not live in CANADA. CANADA is an incorporated dead legal fiction, an abstract concept that exists only in the abstraction of legalisms. We live within our skin on the land called Canada. We are live free women or men and children of Yehovah the true Creator.



We walk free.



Libertinum ingratium leges civiles in pristinalm redigulnt; sed leges angiae semel manumissum semper liberum judicant.

- Co. Litt. 137,

english translation ?

The civil law reduces the unwilling freedman to his original slavery, but the laws of the Angloes judge once manumitted as ever after free.



The English people have had from the days of old simple and pure Common Law rights and property rights. But there also existed along side of it, even in those days, the law of commerce, which is the Maritime Law or Law in Equity, Mercantile Law, Admiralty Law, Law Merchant, Military Law, but usually known as Civil Law. The earliest recorded knowledge we have of Maritime Law is in the Isle of Rhodes, 900 B. C. -- then there's the Laws of Oleron, Laws of the Hanseatic League, Maritime Law, which was part and parcel of their civil law. This is the law of commerce, whereas the Common Law was the law of the women and men living on the land.



William the Conqueror subjugated all the Saxons to his rule except London Town. The merchants controlled the city and their walls held off the invaders. The merchants were able to provision the city by ships and William's soldiers were not able to prevail. Finally, acknowledging that he could not take the City by force, he resorted to compromise. The merchants demanded "the "Lex Mercantoria" [the Maritime Law]. This was granted and remains to this day. The inner City of London has its special law where the Merchant's Law is the law of the City of London.



Protection of their shipping industry was one of the main reasons for the resistance by the merchants of London. The Saxon Common Law had no provision for fictitious persons (companies) or limited liability. Common law recognized only natural women and men with full liability. The Roman Civil Law was a derivative of the Maritime Law and is the basis of Civil Law in most European countries. Identifying features of Roman Common Law are the usage of precedent and judgment by magistrate(s) in courts of Summary jurisdiction.



At Runnymede, in 1215, the Barons of England forced King John to sign the Magna Carta, one of three primary documents establishing the fundamental rights of the English people to this day, {The others being the revision of the Magna Carta in 1225, the Petition of Rights [1628] and the Bill of Rights [1689]}. The primary objective and content of the Magna Carta was the prohibition of the use of Summary jurisdiction [the Roman or Admiralty Law] as a means of unauthorized taxation and seizure of property without due process of Law or just compensation.



The United States of America is a CROWN corporation. In 1604, a group of leading politicians, businessmen, merchants, manufacturers and bankers, met in Greenwich, then in the English county of Kent, and formed a corporation called the Virginia Company in anticipation of the imminent influx of white Europeans, mostly British at first, into the North American continent. Its main stockholder was King James I, and the original charter for the company was completed by April 10th 1606. After the original 13 American colonies won their ?independence? and an ?independent? country was formed after 1783, the Virginia Company simply changed its name to... the United States of America.



There are two USAs, or rather a USA and a usA. The united states of America with a lower case ?u? and ?5? are the lands of the various states. These lands, are still owned by THE CROWN as the head of the old Virginia Company. Then there is the United States of America, capital ?U? and ?S?, which is the 68 square miles of land west of the Potomac River on which is built the federal capital, Washington DC and the District of Columbia. It also includes the US protectorates of Guam and Puerto Rico. The United States of America is not a country... "United States" means -- (A) a federal corporation 28 USC $ 3002(15), Ch.176, It is clear that the United States...is a corporation... 534 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT 724.

It is well settled that "United States" et. al. is a corporation, originally incorporated February 21, 1871 under the name "District of Columbia," 16 Stat. 419 Chap. 62 (reorganized June 11, 1878); a bankrupt organization per House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933, Senate Report 93-549m and Executive Orders 6072, 6102, 6111, and 6246."

One needs to look at the origins of copyright law to see under what laws the corporation of United States was formed, hint: it will take you back to Britain. As well, the inferior negotiating status of America during the Paris Treaty shows that it was not ever considered to be a country like the United Kingdom.



Big Brother in the form of an increasingly powerful government and in an increasingly powerful private sector

will pile the records high with reasons why privacy should give way to national security,

to law and order, to efficiency of operation, to scientific advancement and the like.
- William O. Douglas (1898-1980), U. S. Supreme Court Justice


Love is the Highest Law