Anti M1 campaign gains momentum
Fabian | 19.05.2006 09:31 | Ecology | Health | Sheffield
Around 50 people attended a public meeting yesterday in Sheffield to oppose the widening of the M1 motorway and to demand a radical change in government transport policy to sustainable solutions.
Invited by the No Widening M1 Campaign
http://www.nowideningm1.org.uk
senior anti-road and climate protection campaigners Becca Lush (Road Block) and Tony Bosworth (FOE) introduced key arguments against the building and expanding of roads in face of climate change and energy over-consumption.
Bosworth, looking at the larger picture of transport policy, pointed out, that the government subsidised air travel and motorways with billion of pounds. He said: „Cheap flight do not seem to be that cheap anymore, when you consider that the government is handing 9 Billion Pound over to the aviation-industry annually in subsidies, that is 300 Pound per citizen per year.“
As expensive as the support for air travel is the building of roads while it doesn’t seem to solve traffic problems. While it takes 28 Million Pound to build a mile of motorway, research had shown that new roads are only filling up with new traffic that was generated by them. „You can’t build your way out of congestion“ - the motto of the no-widening campaign - is in fact accepted science.
As Lush explained the governments own Highway Agency was well aware of the futility of building more roads, yet the policy outcome of the Labour government was a 9% real decrease of the costs of motoring, while Busses became 15% and trains 5% more expensive.
„This is sending the wrong signal when we are threatened by climate change.“
While transport is responsible for 27% of all UK CO2 emissions, motorised transport, cars and lorry cause 95% of the whole transport emissions.
Both speakers demanded a change in government policy towards a more sustainable and environmentally sound transport policy. „Spending 3 Billion Pounds not on widening the M1 but on more attractive and cheaper public transport would make a huge difference“, said MP Julie White who works with the No Widening M1 campaign in Sheffield.
Green Party councillor Jillian Creasy, who chaired the meeting, demanded a socially and environmentally sustainable transport policy from the government.
While considering the lobbying important, several people in the audience explained that in face of the urgency to protect the climate, direct action against more roads had to be considered.
Ways to join and support the protest:
The next meeting of the No widening M1 campaign in Sheffield: 4th June, The Rutland Arms (paternoster row), 7.30 pm
http://www.nowideningm1.org.uk
Roadblock conferences in Birmingham, 10th June, 11h to 17h, see http://www.roadblock.org.uk
http://www.nowideningm1.org.uk
senior anti-road and climate protection campaigners Becca Lush (Road Block) and Tony Bosworth (FOE) introduced key arguments against the building and expanding of roads in face of climate change and energy over-consumption.
Bosworth, looking at the larger picture of transport policy, pointed out, that the government subsidised air travel and motorways with billion of pounds. He said: „Cheap flight do not seem to be that cheap anymore, when you consider that the government is handing 9 Billion Pound over to the aviation-industry annually in subsidies, that is 300 Pound per citizen per year.“
As expensive as the support for air travel is the building of roads while it doesn’t seem to solve traffic problems. While it takes 28 Million Pound to build a mile of motorway, research had shown that new roads are only filling up with new traffic that was generated by them. „You can’t build your way out of congestion“ - the motto of the no-widening campaign - is in fact accepted science.
As Lush explained the governments own Highway Agency was well aware of the futility of building more roads, yet the policy outcome of the Labour government was a 9% real decrease of the costs of motoring, while Busses became 15% and trains 5% more expensive.
„This is sending the wrong signal when we are threatened by climate change.“
While transport is responsible for 27% of all UK CO2 emissions, motorised transport, cars and lorry cause 95% of the whole transport emissions.
Both speakers demanded a change in government policy towards a more sustainable and environmentally sound transport policy. „Spending 3 Billion Pounds not on widening the M1 but on more attractive and cheaper public transport would make a huge difference“, said MP Julie White who works with the No Widening M1 campaign in Sheffield.
Green Party councillor Jillian Creasy, who chaired the meeting, demanded a socially and environmentally sustainable transport policy from the government.
While considering the lobbying important, several people in the audience explained that in face of the urgency to protect the climate, direct action against more roads had to be considered.
Ways to join and support the protest:
The next meeting of the No widening M1 campaign in Sheffield: 4th June, The Rutland Arms (paternoster row), 7.30 pm
http://www.nowideningm1.org.uk
Roadblock conferences in Birmingham, 10th June, 11h to 17h, see http://www.roadblock.org.uk
Fabian
Comments
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments
correction
19.05.2006 11:20
Fabian
White Faces
19.05.2006 13:17
Why was this event not held in the locallity ie Tinsley or at the activist of Matilda instaed you complaine about the state but are happy tp pay over 200 pounds on propaganda and booking of a church i only hope god has the room to forgive you for being Middle Class perhaps it might be time to inform the locall community about there GP i know if this person was my GP i have some very serious and real concerns knowing some of the info i know but here is not the place to publish that info well not for this moment at least..
Dundass.
Dundass
?
19.05.2006 13:58
in response to the previous post, am sure that any worthwhile campaign has to start somewhere so that there's proper activist support and the momentum's built before meetings are held in the motorway communities.
this is a worthwhile cause and even if Myra Hindley, and her dead pal Ian, were involved then I'd still say: good luck.
outsider
Previous Post?
20.05.2006 17:29
"While considering the lobbying important, several people in the audience explained that in face of the urgency to protect the climate, direct action against more roads had to be considered."
So, any chance of seeing some motorway bridges getting blown up like
the Angry Brigade might've done in the 70s
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments