Lack of Resources in 7/7 Bombings?!?!?
Daithí MAc Lochlainn | 11.05.2006 15:26 | Analysis | Terror War
“A lack of resources and a string of missed opportunities prevented security services from intercepting the July 7 London bombers, an influential committee of MPs concluded today.”
Of course!
In the summer of 2004, the Dubya Administration leaked the identity of Mohammed Naeem Noor Khan, and in effect, aborted a vital intelligence gathering operation.
This may have been the White House’s most deadly leak of all and we still haven’t seen any serious effort to investigate it.
Please click here and sign the petition to demand an full investigation of this deadly machination pertpetrated by someone lurking in the corridors of the West Wing!
http://gaelicstarover.blogspot.com/2006/05/lack-of-resources.html
Of course!
In the summer of 2004, the Dubya Administration leaked the identity of Mohammed Naeem Noor Khan, and in effect, aborted a vital intelligence gathering operation.
This may have been the White House’s most deadly leak of all and we still haven’t seen any serious effort to investigate it.
Please click here and sign the petition to demand an full investigation of this deadly machination pertpetrated by someone lurking in the corridors of the West Wing!
http://gaelicstarover.blogspot.com/2006/05/lack-of-resources.html
Daithí MAc Lochlainn
Additions
Another alternative scenario - dust explosions
12.05.2006 14:08
dissident blog has a long report on the danger of dust explosions on the London Underground at http://blogs.cjb.net/dissident/56778/ and - although published much earlier - a long refutation of the official narrative at http://blogs.cjb.net/dissident/58288/.
dissident is arguing that the 7 July 2005 London tube explosions were dust explosions possibly caused by Peter Power of Visor Consultants anti-terrorism exercises since the explosions occured "precisely" according to Power's plan.
dissident has also been researching the extra-judicial killing of Jean Charles de Menezes. Comments at the blog suggest that researchers should "dig deeper" into Ian Blair's strange statements.
http://blogs.cjb.net/dissident/56778/ and - although published much earlier - a long refutation of the official narrative at http://blogs.cjb.net/dissident/58288/. dissident is arguing that the 7 July 2005 London tube explosions were dust explosions possibly caused by Peter Power of Visor Consultants anti-terrorism exercises since the explosions occured "precisely" according to Power's plan.
dissident has also been researching the extra-judicial killing of Jean Charles de Menezes. Comments at the blog suggest that researchers should "dig deeper" into Ian Blair's strange statements.
dizzy
Homepage:
http://blogs.cjb.net/dissident/
Comments
Display the following comment