Skip to content or view screen version

Terrorism is glorious!

Alf Narkist | 13.04.2006 08:42 | Repression | Terror War

Terrorism forces democratic governments to reveal their dark side to the general public, which might not be a bad thing, in the interests of democracy.

Under new laws brought in today by the UK Government, it is illegal to glorify terrorism and distribute terrorist publications, such as carry placards. Even certain kinds of trespass is now a terrorist offence. Problem is, the police here already use anti-terrorist legislation to suppress peaceful protests totally unconnected with terrorism so with what inventiveness will they be allowed to deploy this new repressive legislation?

Sample:

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2003/07/274366.html

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/london/2003/09/276420.html

 http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2003/03/57670.html

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/london/topics/anti-racism/

 http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/02/285447.html

Alf Narkist

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

"...a terrible disaster occurred in Britain. Two cities were sacked, eighty thou

13.04.2006 11:42


"...a terrible disaster occurred in Britain. Two cities were sacked, eighty thousand of the Romans and of their allies perished, and the island was lost to Rome. Moreover, all this ruin was brought upon the Romans by a woman, a fact which in itself caused them the greatest shame....But the person who was chiefly instrumental in rousing the natives and persuading them to fight the Romans, the person who was thought worthy to be their leader and who directed the conduct of the entire war, was Buduica, a Briton woman of the royal family and possessed of greater intelligence than often belongs to women....In stature she was very tall, in appearance most terrifying, in the glance of her eye most fierce, and her voice was harsh; a great mass of the tawniest hair fell to her hips; around her neck was a large golden necklace; and she wore a tunic of divers colours over which a thick mantle was fastened with a brooch. This was her invariable attire."

WEZ


Have to come down

14.04.2006 16:51

If the new law can be applied retrospectively, the statue will have to come down and the artist get sent to jail.
Outrageous! I think there are probably mean more examples of such glorification of terrorists to be found in our art galleries and museums, let alone our libraries. Burn the lot I say before it's too late!

fat lady


Mandela

15.04.2006 00:33

There used to be a statue of nelson Madela outside the Royal Festival hall, not sure if its still there, but if it is, it will have to go....

Nelson


Yet Another Glorifier of Terror

15.04.2006 03:54

The Bloody Winston Churchill:

Winston S. Churchill: departmental minute (Churchill papers: 16/16) 12 May 1919 War Office

I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. We have definitely adopted the position at the Peace Conference of arguing in favour of the retention of gas as a permanent method of warfare. It is sheer affectation to lacerate a man with the poisonous fragment of a bursting shell and to boggle at making his eyes water by means of lachrymatory gas.

I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes. The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum. It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.

from Companion Volume 4, Part 1 of the official biography, WINSTON S. CHURCHILL, by Martin Gilbert (London: Heinemann, 1976)

He wanted to spread a lively terror. Out of his own mouth he damns himself. Rip those statues down too.

Urn Archist