WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO ALL THE COMPLAINTS FROM TENANTS THAT HAVE ALL BEEN CONVENIENTLY EDITED?

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST like to engage with good tenants and try to portray them as anti social tenants - Why? I think we should be told?

Why does the CHIEF EXECUTIVE - KATE DAVIES never respond to letters addressed to her?

Is it because she has many children to look after and understandably she has to put her children first and she has not enough time to deal responsibly with the overseeing of staff or the dealing of complaints from tenants?

Why does abuse of vulnerable tenants continue?

Answers are urgently needed as to why the senior management will not answer letters from tenants who raise very disturbing and alarming issues?

The senior management of Notting Hill Housing Trust have a duty to answer and to respond to the letters from tenants with urgent legitimate requests - the facts letters are ignored suggests to most of the tenants that Kate Davies has a tremendous amount to hide in relation to the despicably poor management supervision of front line management?

Why were such appalling senior management appointed if they cannot fulfill basic management functions?

Is this another case of Cronyism?

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
IS NOW A CREATURE OF THE LABOUR PARTY

THE SENIOR MANAGEMENT OF
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
DO NOT ANSWER LETTERS FROM TENANTS
WITH LEGITIMATE COMPLAINTS
WHY?

THE SENIOR MANAGEMENT OF
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
ARE ALL MEMBERS OF
THE LABOUR PARTY
WHY?

THE SENIOR MANAGEMENT OF
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
DO NOT LIKE THE TENANTS OR EX TENANTS OF
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
EXERCISING THEIR LEGAL RIGHTS OF
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
BEING EXERCISED or EXPRESSED
WHY?

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
PROIVIDE PROPERTIES TO INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IN DISREPAIR
YET PROVIDE PROPERTIES IN EXCELLENT REPAIR TO THOSE WHO ARE NON INDIGENOUS PEOPLE
WHY?

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
ARE WELL KNOWN FOR USING CONFRONTATIONAL, NON COMMUNICATION, NON CONSULTATION, ADVERSE HOSTILE TACTICS TO GOOD TENANTS
WHY?


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
PLACE TENANTS FROM HELL NEXT DOOR TO ANY TENANT THAT RAISES LEGITIMATE COMPLAINTS IN WRITING TO THE SENIOR MANAGEMENT
WHY?

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
PROVIDE THE MAJORITY OF HOUSING STOCK TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES - SO THAT THERE IS NO ACCOUNTABILITY
WHY?

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
ARE INVOLVED IN GERRYMANDERING POLITICAL CONSTITUENCIES
WHY?

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
HAD A CHAIRMAN WHO WAS APPOINTED BY TONY BLAIR - HE RECEIVED A LABOUR PARTY PEERAGE FROM TONY BLAIR IN 1998 AND WHO WAS PREVIOUSLY CHAIRMAN OF THE LABOUR PARTY - LORD TOM SAWYER -
HE WAS IN CONTROL OF
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
WHEN SOME 45+ PROPERTIES OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST WERE MISAPPROPRIATED
WHY?

LORD TOM SAWYER ENSURED HE AVOIDED RESPONSIBILITY - HE JUMPED SHIP - JUST IN TIME
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE - ANOTHER LABOUR PARTY MAN - PETER REDMAN
WAS MADE TO BE 'THE FALL GUY'
HE WAS GIVEN A SECRET PAY-OFF
ON THE SAY-SO OF
LORD TOM SAWYER OF CATFORD
OUT OF THE UNACCOUNTABLE NON TRANSPARENT NON INDEPENDENTLY AUDITED PUBLIC TAXPAYERS FUNDS OF
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
WHY?

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
HAS A CHAIRMAN - GERARD LEMOS - WHO WAS NOMINATED BY LORD TOM SAWYER - EX CHAIRMAN OF THE LABOUR PARTY
APPOINTED COMMISSIONER OF THE AUDIT COMMISSION
APPOINTED COMMISSIONER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
APPOINTED DEPUTY CHAIRMAN OF THE BRITISH COUNCIL WHICH IS LADEN WITH LABOUR PARTY CRONIES - UNDERMINES BRITISH VALUES AND BRITISH TRADITIONS
APOINTEE IS SUPPOSEDLY A RAVING HOMOSEXUAL OF INDIAN ANCESTRY WHO SUPPOSEDLY LIVES AT 7 BISHAM GARDENS AT HIGHGATE IN NORTH LONDON AND IS ACTIVELY PROMOTING BREACHES OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, BREACHES OF TRUST LAW, BREACHES OF CIVIL LAW AND BREACHES OF CRIMINAL LAW
WHAT IS MORE - HE DOES NOT REPLY TO LETTERS FROM RESPECTABLE TENANTS
WHY?

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
IS KATE DAVIES - A MEMBER OF THE LABOUR PARTY
SHE DOES NOT ANSWER LETTERS OF LEGITIMATE COMPLAINT FROM RESPECTABLE TENANTS
WHY?

THE SENIOR MANAGEMENT OF
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
USE CONFRONTATIONAL AGGRESSIVE HOSTILE TACTICS TO ANYONE WHO RAISES LEGITIMATE COMPLAINTS IN WRITING
WHY?

THE SENIOR MANAGEMENT OF
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
PLACE GOOD TENANTS IN PURPORTED RENT ARREAS
WHY?

THE SENIOR MANAGEMENT OF
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
MISREPRESENT AND DECEIVE THE GOOD TENANTS OF
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
By CALLING ALL TENANTS CUSTOMERS
YET THEY ARE NOT CUSTOMES
THEY ARE ALL TENANTS
ALL TENANTS ARE BENEFICIARTIES OF A
CHARITABLE TRUST
THE DIRECTORS ARE ALL TRUSTEES
OF A CHARITABLE TRUST
THERE IS DISSEMBLING
THERE ARE LIES
THERE IS DECEPTION
THERE IS SLEAZE
THERE ARE MANY BREACHES OF TRUST LAW
THERE ARE MANY BREACHES OF CIVIL LAW
THERE ARE MANY BREACHES OF CRIMINAL LAW
ALL CARRIED OUT ON A MASSIVE SCALE
WHY?


RESIGNATION OF INCOMPETENT INEFFICIENT INCAPABLE IGNORANT POLITICISED SENIOR MANAGEMENT
INDEPENDENTLY AUDITED ACCOUNTS
ACCOUNTABILITY
TRANSPARENCY
COMMUNICATION
CONSULTATION
REPRESENTATION OF INDEPENDENT TENANTS ON THE BOARD
MORE TENANT REPRESENTATION ON THE BOARD
REMOVAL OF LABOUR PARTY POLITICAL CRONIES
REMOVAL OF CRONIES FROM THE BOARD





NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - LATEST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - LATEST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - LATEST


NEW CHAIR TO NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NEW CHAIR TO NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NEW CHAIR TO NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST


WILL THE HOUSE STYLE CHANGE?
WILL THE HOUSE STYLE CHANGE?
WILL THE HOUSE STYLE CHANGE?


WHY DOES THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE - KATE DAVIES - REMAIN IN PLACE?
WHY DOES THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE - KATE DAVIES - REMAIN IN PLACE?
WHY DOES THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE - KATE DAVIES - REMAIN IN PLACE?


KATE DAVIES DOES NOT COMMUNICATE WITH TENANTS WITH COMPLAINTS
KATE DAVIES DOES NOT COMMUNICATE WITH TENANTS WITH COMPLAINTS
KATE DAVIES DOES NOT COMMUNICATE WITH TENANTS WITH COMPLAINTS


WHY?
WHY?
WHY?


THE INFERENCE IS THAT SHE CAN DO WHAT SHE WANTS - OUT OF CONTROL?
THE INFERENCE IS THAT SHE CAN DO WHAT SHE WANTS - OUT OF CONTROL?
THE INFERENCE IS THAT SHE CAN DO WHAT SHE WANTS - OUT OF CONTROL?


[Due to the massive scandal that was accelerating out of control - whereby the management were regularly confronting tenants who raised legitimate complaints to the most senior management.

The CHAIRMAN of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST was replaced - but is the new CHAIRMAN any better?
Will he reply to letters of legitimate complaint from good tenants?

The CHIEF EXECUTIVE of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has NOT been replaced - so it is quite clear that any letters of legitimate complaint will NOT be answered - as they werte never answered in the past from tenants with legitimate complaints that sought redress to legitimate complaints. So MORE of the same hostility!]
It is merely a COSMETIC change - that appears to be the clear reality.]

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is pleased to announce the appointment of ALAN COLE as the new CHAIRMAN of the Board of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.

Coming from a successful business background, Alan brings commercial insight to help deliver NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST’s vision [what vision might that be - positive or negative - consensual or completely confrontational, as it has been in the past and continues to be in the present - CONFRONTATIONAL and HOSTILE?] for housing in London.

ALAN COLE, age 63, was for eight years, Chief Executive of TDG plc, a European logistics [transport] company. He was non-executive Chairman of both The Oliver Group plc and Alldays plc, and is currently Chairman of JP[John-Pierre] Morgan Fleming Income and Growth Investment Trust plc.

His present non-executive positions include London International Exhibition Centre Holdings and Burren Energy Plc. In addition, ALAN COLE was Deputy Chairman of the South Westminster Custody Visiting Panel. [Is this not linked to the Probation Service?][A Member of the Labour Party?] Taking over from GERARD LEMOS a senior member of the LABOUR PARTY and the GOVERNMENT RACE ADVISER, hurriedly appointed COMMISSIONER of the AUDIT COMMISSION and COMMISSIONER of the CIVIL SERVICE to mention just two of the appointments arranged by TOM SAWYER (appointed as a LABOUR PARTY peer as LORD TOM SAWYER by TONY BLAIR in 1998 and appointed immediately thereafter as CHAIRMAN of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST)!

GERARD LEMOS was the protege of LORD TOM SAWYER of 22 INCHMERY ROAD, CATFORD & DARLINGTON the ex CHAIRMAN of the LABOUR PARTY & head of the NATIONAL UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES (NUPE) now caled UNISON Union.

ALAN COLE said of his appointment “NOTTING HILL (HOUSING TRUST - do not forget it is a CHARITABLE TRUST - with TRUSTEES and with BENEFICIARIES to whom there are very strict LEGAL DUTIES, not mere 'customers' that can be fobbed off at a moment's notice)" is a great organisation doing really interesting things [Please explain and expand...]. There’s a social and a business objective [what about the accountability of taxpayers money... where is the accountability... where is the transparency... where is the involvement of the National Audit Office?] to what they do and I’m looking forward to working with the corporate management team [what about the charitable team of 21+ charity shiops and thousands of vulnerable tenants arte they to be left behind in the goal for the commercialisation and transfer of a chaitable entity into a hard-nosed commercial entity without any kind of redress by tenants that have not been listened to and treated as pariahs and abused by the management whereby the chairman oand chief executive never answered any letters of legitimate complaint to them] to push their agenda forward.” [Please explain what is "the agenda" is tghis the agenda of the Labour Party... the agenda of discrimination as planted into the organization by Gerard Lemos through Lotrd Tom Sawyer and continued by Gerard Lemos who intorduced these policies of divide and rule... and non communication with tenants with legitimate complaints... ]

The departing CHAIRMAN, GERARD LEMOS is leaving the Board after 18 months [why only 18 months, why not the full 4 year tenure or was it because there were so many scandals associated with the senior Labour Party members who were appointed to the Board of Trustees of the Charitable Trust that holds a property portfolio of some 18,000+ properties worth over FOUR BILLION POUNDS - £4,000,000,000] of 'successful' leadership to pursue a professorship at a University in CHINA [Nice and vague]. [In order to place him as far away as possible so that this scandal does not effect the local elections on 4 May 2006 - and TONY BLAIR's reputation as have the so-called 'LOANS' instead of receiving the DONATIONS for LABOUR PARTY funding. ] His clarity of vision [in identifying the 'Divide and Rule' tactics and attacking indigenous people by calling them 'Racist' even though there was not a shred of evidence to substantiate such a tissue of lies was a deviously clever tactic plagiarised from the 'Little Red Book' of Chairman Mao of mainland China] and drive have helped NOTTING HILL achieved a huge amount in a short period of time [please explain...

does that explain why such a very high percentage of income from taxpayers money is expended on management who act in a very confrontational way to any tenant who raises a legitimate complaint which are not answered by the management - why?] and he has planted seeds that will bear fruit in years to come [these appear to be the seeds of division of the discriminatory policies that assure that some people receive immediate brand new luxurious properties, whereas others are dumped in damp hovels with massive disrepair and 'Neighbours from Hell' (such as through the Cyrenian organization with which the Trust has a financially lucrative agreement to their benefit to disperse such people with severe drug and distressing mental problems next to respectable tenants -

is ALAN COLE fully aware of such policies of confronting tenants against the 'Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment', which is read into any tenancy and every tenancy?) and such 'Tenants from Hell' are now deliberately placed next to good tenants with legitimate complaints and they are not supported by the management and are obliged to pursue remedies in the public domain against the landlords due to breaches of civil law, breaches of criminal law, breaches of fundamental human rights, harassnment by the management or by proxy and breaches of basic Trust Law!]. Gerard leaves the organisation in great shape [no, not great shape but in poor shape - let any independent entity ask any fair representative sample of the beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust and a very, very different response would assuredly be forthcoming] for the future.

Under Gerard’s chairmanship, Notting Hill [please note the wording with its strict legal duties and its strict legal responsibilities)] has
• Attained four green lights from the Housing Corporation [The Housing Corporation comes ubnde the ODPM and is NOT INDEPENDENT - it is an entity of the LABOUR GOVERNMENT];
• Been rated by the Audit Commission [The AUDIT COMMISSION is NOT INDEPENDENT - it is an entity of the Executive not of the Legislature - what is more GERARD LEMOS was appointed COMMISSIONER of the AUDIT COMMISSION on the say so of LORD TOM Sawyer [ex CHAIRMAN of the LABOUR PARTY] as his protege which TONY BLAIR [his cheerleader] was able to easily rubberstamp (what it is to control the government - by proxy - of course)!] as an organisation with “excellent prospects and fair [why not excellent ] services”;
• Launched our innovative “Five Steps to Home Ownership” plan, a mould-breaking initiative that helps tenants achieve their aspiration of ownership [The initiative for home owning is the ground-breaking idea of the Opposition - it's good to take the ideas of others and clothe them with the mantle of one's own... isn't it...???];
• Secured development partner status with the Housing Corporation [the Housing Corporation is a federation of all Registered SOcxial Landlords... so this so-called 'achievement' is only to be expected...].

Notting Hill is very grateful to Gerard and wish him ongoing success in the future. [What about wishing success to what the Internet authoritatively informed us was his live-in partner who is his homosexual boyfriend with whom he lives with his boyfriend, homosexual lover and business partner [of Lemos & Crane (social researchers)] Paul Crane at an exclusive stunning luxurious residence at 7 Bisham Gardens, just on the left hand side before reaching the very top of Highgate Hill, next to the very high communication mast for north London - which the Internet authoritatively goes on to inform us is a house with a mortgage in excess of some £750,000]

Ends

Press release issued: April 11 2006
With editorial perusal

This public relations media relations release is so very loose in its use of language that it appears designed for someone with a very limited level of intelligence with a very low IQ. It would be very surprising if the media company were paid very much money for work of such unbelievably poor quality. Yet the media sopin organization is not known for coming cheap - was this another example of a complete waste of resources from the taxpayer.



Yet, why did this release have to be released by exteremely expensive spin doctors, which have all the halmarks of the LABOUR PARTY.

Yet there is meant to be an internal NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Communications Department which is meant to liaise with the Press.

What is more aftwer the many internal scandals at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, one of the Trustees appointed to the Board of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST by GERARD LEMOS was somweone who is a professional PUBLIC RELATIONS CONSULTANT - as the image was getting so tarnished - the readson for the so-called re-branding. Making out that the TRUST element as in the CHARITABLE TRUST could be brushed to one side. Yet, can it not be used in 'the washing' of commercial properties - so that no tax is payable?

Very few entities can switich properties from an entitty that pays tax to one that does not - perhaps the opportunity for properties to be misappropriated like over 45 that were known about that were misappropriated.

What about the pay off of GERARD LEMOS - what was his pay off - termination payment for the breach of his contract? This INFORMATION should be made clear to the BENEFICIARIES of the TRUST as BENEFICIARIES of the CHARITABLE TRUST.

ACCOUNTABILITY of TAXPAYERS FUNDS?

TRANSPARENCY OF THE ACCOUNTS OF TAXPAYERS FUNDS?

INDEPENDENT AUDITING OF TAXPAYERS FUNDS BY THE NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE - WHY NOT?

WHY NO OPPORTUNITY FOR TENANTS TO BE ELECTED AS THE 'ONE POUND' SHAREHOLDERS TO THE BOARD?

THERE ARE MORE QUESTIONS THAT WILL NOT BE ANSWERED AS THE NEW CHAIRMAN IS UNLIKELY TO BE INTERESTED IN ADDRESSING THE CONFRONTATIONAL TACTICS OF THE MANAGEMENT HOUSE STYLE

IS THE NEW CHAIRMAN OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST A MERE INSTRUMENT OF THE LABOUR PARTY IN REPLACING THE PREVIOUS SENIOR MEMBER OF THE LABOUR PARTY WHO WAS PREVIOUS CHAIRMAN OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST?

ACTIONS SPEAK VOLUMES...


Most BENEFICIARIES of the Charitable TRUST would like to know what was the EXACT financial package paid out of accountable TRUST funds by the TRUSTEES on behalf of the BENEFICIARIES of the TRUST to GERARD LEMOS in order to compensate him as tendering his untimely resignation as CHAIRMAN. One factor is the linking to the fact that GERARD LEMOS as CHAIRMAN of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST never dealt with letters of legitimate complaints from reasonable tenants of the Trust to its CHAIRMAN or to its CHIEF EXECUTIVE. Chairmen usually transfer responsibility as Chairman at the time of the ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING...

So why did the senior members of the LABOUR PARTY seek to ensure the immediate departure of 'our friend' [GERARD LEMOS] who did NOT communicate with the TENANTS with legitimate complaints that deserved to be answered and whom he treated with complete disregard and with absolute arrogance - in the exact way the CHIEF EXECUTIVE - KATE DAVIES treats TENANTS of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, many of whom have legitimate complaints, that are dealt with in an extremely offhand ARROGANT, PATRONISING, UNCONCERNED manner] and to pay for the legacy put in place by the agents of the LABOUR PARTY for all those [pernicious] seeds he left to develop at the TRUST... [such as the discriminatory policies... not dissimilar to the policies enunciated by wicked CHAIRMAN MAO... GERARD LEMOS is welcome to CHAIRMAN MAO and his 'LITTLE RED BOOK'... Let him enjoy the 1,400 million people of the Republic of China, in comparison to our 60 million people in the UK. Does GERARD LEMOS [of Indian ancestry, who planted the present Treasurer (also of Indian ancestry - they were both previously in the same ASRA Housing Association) into the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST] now want to encourage full scale Immigration into this small island from the mainland of China .... look out... let's now have 1,400 Million+ Political Asylum seekers to this country... I'm sure the Taxpayers Alliance of this country would be extremely pleased to pay for this questionable advantage...???