What is the point of Tessa Jowell 'resigning'? Corruption, sleaze, greed - these have now become the 'normal' 'qualities' that are to be EXPECTED in a Tony Blair cabinet minister!

What we need in the UK is far more serious than a mere ritualistic resignation charade! Remember Peter Mandelson, the very first Blair cabinet bigwig to 'resign'! Whatever was learnt from that?


Last week, the BBC Radio brought in David Blunkett, no less, to give an 'ethical' backing statement in praise of Tessa Jowell!

Need one say more!!???

1030 Sunday
5 March 2006

Khoodeelaar & Bethnal Green and Bow Constituent. Its like a marriage made in heaven.

Either stop responding to your own Galloway lickspittle posts or credit us with with a little bit more sense and make your "Bethnal Green and Bow Constituent" a little more original.

Please stop your pathetic New Labour trolling. Just because your party is trying to wreck a community in the interests of big business stop making up lies about activists who are trying to stop it happening.

concerned londoner - is this another one of your pseudonyms. Your multipule personality is quite charming - in a way.

Rather a New Labour troll than a lickspittle for the corrupt, self adoring permatan buffoon that is Galloway.

He so concerned about fighting for poor Londoners that he took a 3 week holiday on national TV.

Why do you keep naming Galloway ? It isn't helping your cause, not here at least. Aren't your own arguments worthy enough, do you feel so inferior that you have to name-drop MPs ? Can't you fight the crossrail hole without sycophantically referencing that arsehole ?

You see, the number of times you post on this subject - and you do post a lot on a relatively minor injustice ( I don't mean to dimish your campaign but Tower Hamlets isn't Falluja is it ?) - just serves to isolate yourself from those of us here who think GG is a disgraceful self-promoting fraud.

I wish your campaign well, but i do suggest you would further it better by dropping the constant subvertising for GG. In other words, are you really promoting your cause or are you simply promoting GG ? If GG opposed your cause would you still post about crossrail ? If so, then do it yourself, and respect yourself, and don't expect anything than abuse when you fawn to an obvious shit.

Danny
Yes Khoodeelaar does mention Galloway alot and is obviously happy that he is supporting the campaign. Maybe he does mention it too frequently but most of his posts seems to be defending GG and the campaign against some New Labour slur. Whatever you think about Galloway surely it is good that he supports the campaign—isn’t that what he should be doing?
You only have to look at the hypocritical nonsense spouted by the New Labour trolls to see who the real enemy is. They are relying on the left to spend its time attacking each other rather than joining together to stop Crossrail. We should unite to try to oust that warmongering moron Blair and his brainless sychophants (see New Labour troll posts).

© The AUTHOR / KHOODEELAAR / CBRUK /LAWMEDIA 2006

No, Danny, George Galloway is not Khoodeelaar! Campaign’s boss.

Khoodeelaar! exists to inform the community of the dangers of Crossrail.

It also exists to oppose the threats posed by Crossrail to the East End of London.

It so happens that the only elected MP from anywhere across the East End [and to the East] of London who is actively engaged in discussions over the Crossrail hole attacks plans on the East End is George Galloway.

Georeg gallwoay is also the elcete MP for Bethnal green and Bow, the part of East End which is most at risk from the Crossrail planned attacks.

We have stated more than once, we do not belong to any party or grouping along party political lines.

Khoodeelaar! welcomes the support that George Galloway has given so far. We record his statements. We report on the related events.

We are not going to deprive George Galloway the citations and the references because to do so would be inconvenient to some whose agenda is to do George Galloway down.

We are – dare we say it – more than able to organise our campaign activities without compromising the main aims and objects.

Why are you apparently annoyed with our factually justified and journalistically warranted and ethically consistent and frequent inclusion of positive references to George Galloway?

Are you perhaps one of those internet users - visitors – or surfers- who may have been exposed to may be too much anti-George Galloway plugs on the internet, perhaps staring with the results of the election on 6 May 2005?

The day that the Blaired BBC inaugurated the most poisonous programme via the media of vilification within minutes of the results of the 5 May 2005 election being announced.

We have not forgotten how vicious, unfair, inaccurate, misleading, offensive and dishonest and biased Jeremy Paxman was.

We have not forgotten what the late Tony Banks said in his typically racist patronising comments allegedly uttered on behalf of Oona King and at the expenses of all genuine supporters of elected democracy.

We have not overlooked the more than 5 Million ‘items’ of anti-Galloway drivel and rubbish and lies that were placed on the internet in January 2006.

We have fuller knowledge than you may think as to who created those initial hysterical racist rubbish by vilifying George Galloway.

We do not have to belong to the RESPECT grouping that George Galloway at the present time politically organisationally belongs to.

But we do not have to suspend judgment or sense far less take leave of our ability to make rational decisions as to who is the proper voice that the community needs to be represented by on a given issue in the correct and the right context EITHER

Given that the Crossrail hole attacks plan was BROUGHT to the East End by the clique of conspiring and corrupt controllers of the resources and the name of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council, given that the MP for the area for eight years upto 5 May 2005 [Oona King] failed to recognise the momentous importance to the community of the Crossrail attacks, given that the man – Tony McNulty – who as a Minister as the time in the Department of Transport [that has been acting as the promoter in parliament of the Crossrail attacks] played a key role in the final ‘internal negotiations’ on the contents of what is now the Hosue of Commons Crossrail Bill was married – and remains married [as we write this at 1330 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 7 march 2006] to Christine Gilbert who as the occupant of the post of Chief Executive in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council was formally advising the clique that controlled the Tower Hamlets Council as it acted as the collective tout for the Crossrail attacks on the East End, do you think it so ‘improper’ for the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against Crossrail hole attacks to include the support being expressed to our campaign by the elected MP George Galloway?

Were you perhaps motivated by the spin and the lies that have been produced by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council against George Galloway in January 2006?

Were you may be drawn to positively view the glee-dance that was staged for three seconds before a camera crew by the disgraced Blair Whip in the UK Hosue of Commons, Hilary Armstrong?

Are you by any chance, perhaps related to John Biggs, the Greater London Assembly member for the area including Bethnal green and Bow?

Whatever your real name is, whoever you may, you have not got anything to worry about over the Khoodeelaar campaign's links with anybody.

We are not linked in any way that could be compared with what we have described as the Tessa Jowell type of a link.


We are ordinary people trying to do what we legitimately can to defend our community that big business and big political forces are set to crush.

If you are an ordinary person [that is, if you are not emplyed as a Blairing spin opertators or hodler of a Blairing ptronaged post or psostion], think about these things before you may wish to pen another hostile post.