Skip to content or view screen version

Channel 4: Secret Memo Exposes How Bush and Blair Tried To Lure Saddam Into War.

FPF-fwd.: Channel 4 News Gary Gibbon | 03.02.2006 14:21 | Analysis | Globalisation | Repression

Blair responds that he is: "solidly with the President and ready to do whatever it took to disarm Saddam." Bush told Blair he: "thought it unlikely that there would be internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups."



FPF-fwd.:

CHANNEL 4 NEWS YOU WON'T FIND ON CNN

Revealed: Secret Memo Exposes How Bush and Blair Tried To Lure Saddam Into War.

The White House memo

By: Gary Gibbon

Revealed: Bush and Blair discussed using American Spyplane in UN colours to lure Saddam into war.
 
Memo extracts

Published: 02/02/06 - by: Channel 4 News

Taken from the White House Meeting Memo, 31 January 2003, seen by Channel 4 News - and detailed in 'Lawless World' by Philippe Sands.

President Bush to Tony Blair: "The US was thinking of flying U2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in UN colours. If Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach"

Bush: "It was also possible that a defector could be brought out who would give a public presentation about Saddam's WMD, and there was also a small possibility that Saddam would be assassinated."

Blair: "A second Security Council Resolution resolution would provide an insurance policy against the unexpected and international cover, including with the Arabs. "

Bush: "The US would put its full weight behind efforts to get another resolution and would 'twist arms' and 'even threaten'. But he had to say that if ultimately we failed, military action would follow anyway.''

Blair responds that he is: "solidly with the President and ready to do whatever it took to disarm Saddam." Bush told Blair he: "thought it unlikely that there would be internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups."


At the ICH link below you'll find the video - Click Play To View


Channel 4 News tonight reveals extraordinary details of George Bush and Tony Blair's pre-war meeting in January 2003 at which they discussed plans to begin military action on March 10th 2003, irrespective of whether the United Nations had passed a new resolution authorising the use of force.

Channel 4 News has seen minutes from that meeting, which took place in the White House on 31 January 2003. The two leaders discussed the possibility of securing further UN support, but President Bush made it clear that he had already decided to go to war. The details are contained in a new version of the book 'Lawless World' written by a leading British human rights lawyer, Philippe Sands QC.

President Bush said that:

"The US would put its full weight behind efforts to get another resolution and would 'twist arms' and 'even threaten'. But he had to say that if ultimately we failed, military action would follow anyway.''

Prime Minister Blair responded that he was: "solidly with the President and ready to do whatever it took to disarm Saddam."

But Mr Blair said that: "a second Security Council resolution would provide an insurance policy against the unexpected, and international cover, including with the Arabs."

Mr Sands' book says that the meeting focused on the need to identify evidence that Saddam had committed a material breach of his obligations under the existing UN Resolution 1441. There was concern that insufficient evidence had been unearthed by the UN inspection team, led by Dr Hans Blix. Other options were considered.

President Bush said: "The US was thinking of flying U2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in UN colours. If Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach."

He went on: "It was also possible that a defector could be brought out who would give a public presentation about Saddams WMD, and there was also a small possibility that Saddam would be assassinated."

Speaking to Channel 4 News, Mr Sands said:

"I think no one would be surprised at the idea that the use of spy-planes to review what is going on would be considered. What is surprising is the idea that they would be used painted in the colours of the United Nations in order to provoke an attack which could then be used to justify material breach. Now that plainly looks as if it is deception, and it raises some fundamental questions of legality, both in terms of domestic law and international law."

Also present at the meeting were President Bush's National Security Adviser, Condoleeza Rice and her deputy Dan Fried, and the Presidents Chief of Staff, Andrew Card. The Prime Minister took with him his then security adviser Sir David Manning, his Foreign Policy aide Matthew Rycroft, and and his chief of staff, Jonathan Powell.

Those present, as documented in Mr Sands' book, also discussed what might happen in Iraq after liberation.

President Bush said that he: "thought it unlikely that there would be internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups."

Mr Blair did not respond.

 
The Foreign Office issued a statement:

"The Government only committed UK forces to Iraq after securing the approval of the House in the vote on 18 march 2003.

"The decision to resort to military action to ensure Iraq fulfilled its obligation imposed by successive UN Security Council Resolutions was taken only after all other routes to disarm Iraq had failed.


"Of course during this time there were frequent discussions between UK and US Governments about Iraq."

[andend] - Copyright Chanel4 UK.

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)


Story + video at Information Clearing House - Url.:  http://tinyurl.com/7ju5a

 

FPF-fwd.: Channel 4 News Gary Gibbon
- e-mail: fpf@chello.nl
- Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/7ju5a

Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

Drip feeding information

03.02.2006 17:28

I'm just wondering about the morality of authors who withhold information that embarrasses the war-mongers until they can write a book and get it on the shelves. If the Philipe Sands ( a colleague of Cherie Blairs ) knew about this then surely he should have released the information asap, rather than waiting until he could cash in on it himself. I wonder what else he found in Cheries handbag.

If anyone here is sitting on similar gems and for some reason doesn't want to publish it here, call a bleedin' press conference before you call your publishers.

This proves not only that Blair is a lying war-mongering traitor, but that Bush was ready to use false-flag provocation to try and justify the war.

Danny


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

It was right to overthrow Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi people had to be liberated!

03.02.2006 18:09

It was absolutly right to overthrow the regime of evil, insane Saddam Hussein. The Iraqi people had to be liberated! Under no circumstances was it wrong to overthrow such a vile, cruel, evil regime.
 http://www.protestwarrior.com

ProtestWarrior


Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments