Are we running out of oil or not?
peak watch | 03.02.2006 09:51 | Analysis | Ecology | World
Anyone who has been reading up on the issue of peak oil will know the question is not whether we are running out of oil but rather when we will find that extraction levels start to decline and we can no-longer extract oil fast enough to meet growing demand. In response to Bush juniors pathetic state of the union address yesterday, Royal Dutch Shell have claimed that the world was nowhere near to running out of oil. At the same time, Shell, the world's third biggest oil and gas company, announced record profits for any British company, nearly £13billion ($23billion). Their profits are up 30% thanks to inflated oil prices and compare well to $22billion forecast for BP next week.
But what of peak oil? Jeroen van der Veer, Shell's chief, claimed world oil and gas production was nowhere near peaking because of the potential of untapped reserves made economic by the higher oil price.
He added, "There is the theory of 'peak oil' - that the big discoveries have all gone. But we don't know where the peak will come with oil sands. With oil shale, we have not yet started. There will be many peaks in many time frames."
Never-the-less, Shell's production last year fell from 3.7m barrels a day (bpd) to 3.5m after hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico knocked out some platforms. Militant protests are also affecting the company's interests in Nigeria, knocking out at least 100,000 barrels of oil production per day. Shell was working to bring full production back on stream, it said. It admitted it only replaced six or seven of every 10 barrels the company extracted last year, up from five out of every 10 in 2004.
It stuck to a target of averaging a "reserve replacement ratio" of more than 100pc, a figure it last surpassed in the 1990s, between 2004 and 2008, however. Shell is increasing capital expenditure to try to find more oil and gas, spending $19billion on looking for more hydrocarbons this year, compared with $15.6billion in 2005.
He added, "There is the theory of 'peak oil' - that the big discoveries have all gone. But we don't know where the peak will come with oil sands. With oil shale, we have not yet started. There will be many peaks in many time frames."
Never-the-less, Shell's production last year fell from 3.7m barrels a day (bpd) to 3.5m after hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico knocked out some platforms. Militant protests are also affecting the company's interests in Nigeria, knocking out at least 100,000 barrels of oil production per day. Shell was working to bring full production back on stream, it said. It admitted it only replaced six or seven of every 10 barrels the company extracted last year, up from five out of every 10 in 2004.
It stuck to a target of averaging a "reserve replacement ratio" of more than 100pc, a figure it last surpassed in the 1990s, between 2004 and 2008, however. Shell is increasing capital expenditure to try to find more oil and gas, spending $19billion on looking for more hydrocarbons this year, compared with $15.6billion in 2005.
peak watch
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
A confusion of terms?
03.02.2006 14:04
Here we have a person looking at it from the point of view of an economist arguing that there is no issue about peak oil because ........
a) It won't be happening SOON (apparently things not in the immediate future aren't real -- they don't affect next quarter's or next year's or maybe even next decade's balance sheet)
b) That a difference in the CONSTANT affects the slope of a curve whose equation is O = R - CT
(the amount of Oil remaining is the original Reserve amount minus the amount Conusmed each year times the amount of Time elapsed)
There is an entirely different way of looking at the matter, physical reality. For which the equation looks like.........
O = R + BT - CT
where we now consider R to be the constant not of what Reserves are known to exist but which DO exist (ignoring whether economic of extraction or not) and where B is the constant rate at which Biological oil is currently being created > and again C is our rate of Consumption and T the Time
Looked at this way, the only thing that matters with regard to IS there a thing such as "Peak Oil" is whether B < C --- if we are using oil faster than the sustainable rate of oil production -- and in THIS case I do NOT mean "economic production" but PHYSICAL production, then the curve dO/dT WILL have a maximum as long as B < C and this truth is irrespective of the size of the constant R. The only thing changing R does is to change WHEN "Peak Oil" happens, not IF "Peak Oil" happens.
Mike
e-mail: stepbystpefarm mtdata.com
easy answer
03.02.2006 14:41
We use 1.2 CM every year.
So there is less than 28 years left of supplies.
However we are now at maximum output to service maximum demand as both China Europe and America expect to raise demands soon.
As oil pressure gets weak, water is pumped into the depleting reserve, which costs money, so petrol becomes more expensive than Iced Soda, and milk cost more to get to the supermarket and then before you know it everything that is a petrochemical or needs a petrochemical costs more money.
That’s everything BTW.
So the economy loses the unnecessary, and buys only the essentials.
I Hope your working for a primary producer as oil becomes too expensive in 8 years time.
Simon
e-mail: simonwillace@hotmail.com
YES!
03.02.2006 14:51
And, what if we're not? Does that make everything OK if we are not?
Why do you ask?
Jools
jools
who care??????????
04.02.2006 01:34
this system of explotation is possible thanx to oil.
so again who cares if oil is running out?
are we scared to lose our privilege?
pedro
we lose our privileges, the unprivileged lose their lives
04.02.2006 15:26
Even those that can feed themselves without oil-sustained monoculture, permaculturalists and peasants, know to fear the end of oil as you should fear a starving mob. The US war-machine is an oil vampire. Oil is literally power now that our elite have stumbled into an evolutionary dead-end, and when the going gets tough, the tough kill the rest of us for what little we have. I think the amount of violence in the world will increase as the oil runs out. Fossil fuels have fucked the climate and were unsustainable anyway but I hate the bullshit PR for nuclear that is being railroaded through. It's based on the fallacy that we couldn't switch to renewables in time to avoid climate change. We could switch to renewables within a year if we stopped building shit like weapons and planes and racing cars. The real reason we haven't already switched to renewables is because once any community gets a sustainable source of energy it becomes effectively autonomous, like Scoraig is. Nothing to do with me, but when I was on Skye one village applied for a wind generator simply for when things go belly up - and they'll blow the Skye Bridge to stop the rest of us joining them !
Danny