Why censor a legit post
Bob | 03.02.2006 07:36
Apparently asking the readers / contributors to indymedia what their views were on the aquittal of pRick Griffin "contradicts editorial guidelines" - Exactly how?
Is it a case of not wanting to admit that you:
a) failed
b) were wrong?
Believe me I am no supporter of those idiots but I find it reprehensible that even mentioning the case is considered unpublishable.
What kind of closed shop is being run at indymedia, all this has done is raise wider issues about the freedom of speech that IMC 'editors' deign correct.
Some answers would be nice, some reaction to the publicity fanfare that the fascists are gloating in would be healthy...... or will you simply just 'hide' this post too?
(hate to say it but you are getting as bad as them!)
Is it a case of not wanting to admit that you:
a) failed
b) were wrong?
Believe me I am no supporter of those idiots but I find it reprehensible that even mentioning the case is considered unpublishable.
What kind of closed shop is being run at indymedia, all this has done is raise wider issues about the freedom of speech that IMC 'editors' deign correct.
Some answers would be nice, some reaction to the publicity fanfare that the fascists are gloating in would be healthy...... or will you simply just 'hide' this post too?
(hate to say it but you are getting as bad as them!)
Bob
Comments
Display the following comment