URGENT:Possible Jury Tampering/Undisclosed Collusion in Leeds Far Right Trial
The Illuminator | 01.02.2006 13:58 | Anti-racism | Social Struggles
The information provided by me, is provided on good faith, and I hope it is investigated further. It may turn out not to be true, but if there is the slightest element of fact, I trust the court and legal authorities will investigate further, to ascertain whether or not this did happen.
Any collusion/communication/undisclosed interest in a criminal case MUST be disclosed beforehand, if conflicting with the fair and legal functioning of the jury.
This morning, a member of the public gallery told me at first hand how they CLEARLY noticed a member of the jury wink at Nick Griffin.
I am obviously open-minded about this, as the following things could have happened.
1) The juror in question, might have had a piece of dust in their eye.
2) Or a rogue eyelash.
3) Maybe (no humour intended), the member of the jury had just awoken, and wasn't in full control of their eye movements.
The most worrying, and highly illegal conclusion, is that the wink was indeed an unauthorised method of communication between juror and defendent, contravening several sections of British law, and in-fact threatening the whole facet of British law that is enshrined in our constitution -
THE IMPARTIALITY OF THE JURY SYSTEM.
If there is any doubt whatsoever surrounding the actions/interactions of one member of the jury, it is imperitive that the claim is thoroughly investigated by WQednesday's courtroom CCTV evidence, to ascertain whether or not there was any truth to the rumour that one of the jurors did indeed wink to Nick Griffin.
As stated before, THIS IS NOT idle TITTLE-TATTLE or HEARSAY.
I trust the Leeds Crown Court Judicial Team will study the cctv evidence fully.
It won't take long to study the CCTV cameras from a single court session.
Yours Sincerely,
The Illuminator
Any collusion/communication/undisclosed interest in a criminal case MUST be disclosed beforehand, if conflicting with the fair and legal functioning of the jury.
This morning, a member of the public gallery told me at first hand how they CLEARLY noticed a member of the jury wink at Nick Griffin.
I am obviously open-minded about this, as the following things could have happened.
1) The juror in question, might have had a piece of dust in their eye.
2) Or a rogue eyelash.
3) Maybe (no humour intended), the member of the jury had just awoken, and wasn't in full control of their eye movements.
The most worrying, and highly illegal conclusion, is that the wink was indeed an unauthorised method of communication between juror and defendent, contravening several sections of British law, and in-fact threatening the whole facet of British law that is enshrined in our constitution -
THE IMPARTIALITY OF THE JURY SYSTEM.
If there is any doubt whatsoever surrounding the actions/interactions of one member of the jury, it is imperitive that the claim is thoroughly investigated by WQednesday's courtroom CCTV evidence, to ascertain whether or not there was any truth to the rumour that one of the jurors did indeed wink to Nick Griffin.
As stated before, THIS IS NOT idle TITTLE-TATTLE or HEARSAY.
I trust the Leeds Crown Court Judicial Team will study the cctv evidence fully.
It won't take long to study the CCTV cameras from a single court session.
Yours Sincerely,
The Illuminator
The Illuminator
Comments
Hide 7 hidden comments or hide all comments
Check The Evidence Please, Somebody!!!
01.02.2006 14:20
It might not be true, but you're right, it doesn't hurt to examine the tapes just to make sure nothing happened.
Smiffy
Smiffy
nudge, nudge
01.02.2006 14:41
Danny
Or........
01.02.2006 14:54
However, I'm sure Griffin's people would have told any insider on the jury not to do as such.
Putting it on Indymedia is hardly great is it?
However, a mate of mine once went to the urinals and had a piss nect to Collett and did confirm that he was circumcised.
I shall bring that to the attention of the BNP as it is obviously a Zionist plot.
Plant Pot
Who cares
01.02.2006 17:44
The BNP has no power and won't get any, Griffin is unelectable and only the Left and its tried journeymen keep him in the news with their constant "attacks".
Move on
Jerry
Kosher Kollett
01.02.2006 20:03
The Jewish BNP councillor Richardson and her supposedly gentile husband (who looks and acts more Jewish than her) was the last straw for the dedicated National Socialists in the BNP and most left, the rest were expelled or are due for expulsion. Just what Griffin wants. Give it to the next General Election and the BNP will be about as extreme as UKIP, just what ZOG wants, a watered down anti-immigrant pressure valve to keep the white working class satisfied.
Kike Spotter
Now, now Arthur
01.02.2006 22:48
Poor you, Arthur. Sorry to hear about your daddy.
Plant Pot Detector
POSTER: PLEASE GET IN TOUCH
02.02.2006 19:40
I am an investigative freelance and I would like to follow this up. I would need to talk to the person in the public gallery who saw this happen, at least by phone. You can contact me, in complete confidence, at
Charlie
POSTER: PLEASE READ
02.02.2006 20:25
I am an investigative freelance, and would like to help pursue this story. I would need to talk to the person in the public gallery, by phone, if that is the best way. You can contact me in confidence at
Charlie
Plant pot alert!
02.02.2006 21:53
Jeez, amongst all that free porn, how does he find time to investigate owt else?
Cockfishmoneky
You are full of SHIT!
03.02.2006 03:52
Southcoast Assassin
e-mail:
fuck@you.wankers
Nazis Like "South Coast Assasin" Should Not Be Posting Race Hate on Indymedia
03.02.2006 07:58
Whoever wrote it, seems to have observed something ontoward.
Log off and go scizophenic listening to your skrewdriver, loser!!!
Hitler masturbator and fancier Collett might have escaped four charges, but it dosn't mean the BNP can "have their heads held high" walking through British streets.
Not when there are anarchists and anti-nazis on your case, you piece of mother (and daddy) white supremacist fucking shite!!!
Kill Fash
Idiot!!!! Nazis shouldn't be posting on Indymedia
03.02.2006 08:12
That's where the nazis and paedos like you, belong.
Maybe you're that weirdo Collett himself. He's posted on here, many times before, in disguise, (often with the pseudonym Max)
If so, can you tell us why you're so strange, and women don't like to sleep with you???
Three years ago, the Halifax Evening Courier newspaper reported that mark collett threatened a woman with rape, outside the Halifax Council offices.
The defendant was too scared to press charges.
neo-Nazi losers like you, sure know how to prevert the course of justice (pervert being the apt word)
Anything is possible including Jury collusion...
Mark Collett Can't Get A Girlfriend
I was wrong
06.02.2006 03:11
Danny
Hide 7 hidden comments or hide all comments