ANARCHY IN THE UK! (Part 2)
Joe | 01.02.2006 11:18
Earlier Link: 
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/01/332413.html?c=on#c140875
Quote- "Just to point out to people who think I am working in a group well I am not. I am working alone. If one person can do this just think how many a hundred can do?"
I never expected that you'd be working in a group. Almost be definition anarchist usually work alone. Groups rarely work out, they split, fight, or fail to make decisions. A hundred anarchist will achieve little more than one working by themselves.
Anarchy is a great idea but collectively we seem unable to put it into practice in a way that enables us to work together. I wish it were different but that's how it is.
only one" - End Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with that statement, I will confess I didn't make myself very clear, I was refering to the fact if one person could "easily" produce a leafet given the fact with have loads of time to produce one. It just takes one person living under each constituent to produce something and providing that you don't make yourself sound like a twat. For example, considering I live in a "Tory Area" so to preach about the illegality of the Iraqi war. I would know I will sound like a instant twat. Concidering everybody who lives here got two cars each, they hardly going to give a toss about illegality provided as long as they get petrol. To stop myself sounding like a twat, I could for example say (put a spin (Forgive me!)) The government maltreatment of the Intelligence specialise David Kelly has a lot to desire towards it's own staff etc, etc. People then might have a different view and may even listen to what we have to say.
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/01/332413.html?c=on#c140875 Quote- "Just to point out to people who think I am working in a group well I am not. I am working alone. If one person can do this just think how many a hundred can do?"
I never expected that you'd be working in a group. Almost be definition anarchist usually work alone. Groups rarely work out, they split, fight, or fail to make decisions. A hundred anarchist will achieve little more than one working by themselves.
Anarchy is a great idea but collectively we seem unable to put it into practice in a way that enables us to work together. I wish it were different but that's how it is.
only one" - End Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with that statement, I will confess I didn't make myself very clear, I was refering to the fact if one person could "easily" produce a leafet given the fact with have loads of time to produce one. It just takes one person living under each constituent to produce something and providing that you don't make yourself sound like a twat. For example, considering I live in a "Tory Area" so to preach about the illegality of the Iraqi war. I would know I will sound like a instant twat. Concidering everybody who lives here got two cars each, they hardly going to give a toss about illegality provided as long as they get petrol. To stop myself sounding like a twat, I could for example say (put a spin (Forgive me!)) The government maltreatment of the Intelligence specialise David Kelly has a lot to desire towards it's own staff etc, etc. People then might have a different view and may even listen to what we have to say.
Joe