Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

London police faked evidence on shot Brazilian: report

AFP | 29.01.2006 19:10

See how easy it is to manipulate these stories? He wasn't "mistaken for a suicide bomber". That was the Cover Story that was disproven when these lies were exposed.

We still do not know who shot this man, who they were working for, or why they did it? Where was this electrician dispatched that morning, and did he see something which he should not have, such as Mossad agents planting devices which would lead investigators of 7/7 to a specific target, such as Iran or Syria?

London police 'faked evidence' on shot Brazilian: report

Sun Jan 29, 7:06 AM ET

LONDON (AFP) - Undercover London police officers faked vital evidence to cover up their fatal role in the shooting of innocent Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes, mistaken for a suicide bomber, a newspaper has alleged.

Special Branch officers from London's Metropolitan Police tried to change a surveillance log detailing the electrician's movements to hide the fact that they had wrongly identified him, the News of the World weekly claimed.

De Menezes, 27, was shot seven times in the head on a London Underground train at Stockwell station in south London.

He was killed on July 22 last year, the day after an alleged attempt to replicate the July 7 attacks by four suspected suicide bombers which killed 52 innocent Underground and bus commuters.

The alleged cover-up meant the blame for the tragedy would have been pinned on senior Met Police commanders or the armed police who fired the bullets -- leaving them open to murder charges, the newspaper said.

The revelations are apparently contained in the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)'s report into the death, which was delivered to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) 10 days ago.

A Special Branch officer mistakenly reported that De Menezes was Hussein Osman, 27, who is facing charges of conspiracy to murder in connection with the July 21 incident.

However, once they realised their fatal error, the log was altered to read that no positive identification had been made.

A government department source told the tabloid: "It says the log was actually tampered with in a major way.

"In particular the words AND and NOT were inserted about the Osman ID, so it read 'and it was not Osman' rather than 'it was Osman'."

The log was allegedly changed at a debriefing meeting 10 hours after the Brazilian was gunned down.

It had been produced by colleagues of the officers listening to the team's radio messages.

During the debriefing, the officers were allowed to check for errors and amend them -- but crucially, the alterations were not explained and signed as they apparently should have been.

The newspaper quoted the IPCC report as reading: "This looks like an attempt to try and distance Special Branch from the decision (to shoot De Menezes)."

The source said: "It was blatant, it was clumsy.

"By doing that forgery they potentially made their colleagues back at the control room at central command at the Yard (police headquarters), and particularly their firearm officer colleagues, liable to be out in the dock for murder."

An IPCC spokesman said the organisation "would neither confirm nor deny" anything in the alleged leak.

"We do not comment on speculation," he said.

Asad Rehman, who represents the victim's family, said the alleged leak strengthened relatives' demands to see the report.

"From the family's perspective this is just one more in a long line in lies and deception surrounding the circumstances of Jean's death.

"It makes them more adamant to learn how and why he died. The only way that can be done is by a full public inquiry.

"They are at the end of their tether in the manner the whole death has been treated. There has been such a catalogue of disaster surrounding this case."

The IPCC investigates deaths with either direct or indirect police involvement as a matter of course. The CPS handles criminal cases and is expected to take several months to decide whether to bring charges.

Candles and flowers at Stockwell tube station in London for a vigil marking the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes by police. Undercover London police officers faked vital evidence to cover up their fatal role in the shooting of the innocent Brazilian, a newspaper has alleged(AFP/File/John D.McHugh)

AFP
- Homepage: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060129/ts_afp/britainattacksbrazilpolice_060129054709;_ylt=AmcKUeoLPFrtyYu4GWJssYGFOrgF;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

Obviously a conspiracy

29.01.2006 19:20

Must have been Mossad, that's why they faked evidence. It couldn't possibly be because they know they fucked up and killed someone and might get in trouble for it.

evil spoil sport


Only An Investigation Will Tell

29.01.2006 23:06

"Must have been Mossad"

It ce3rtainly does stand to reason, since the same Israeli "security company" - staffed with "former" members of the Mossad - that provided security to ONLY the airports used on 911, also ran security for the Underground.

Some investigation of this matter would be nice.

"It couldn't possibly be because they know they fucked up and killed someone and might get in trouble for it."

Oh, they certainly did do that, but they cannot prove their Cover Story, so we still do not know who emptied their clip at this prone man, who they were working for, or why. It's the depth of the unknown and uninvestigated which suggests something more sinister than "oops!".

An investigation, as I've said, would be a great place to start, not the "ludicrous distraction" Bliar said it would be (just as Bush did with 911). Where this electrician was working that morning is a simply question, requiring a simple answer.

al Qaeda = CIA/Mossad/MI6


Cover my Ass

30.01.2006 11:37

They claim the subsequent 'cover-up' was to mask police blunders and save their ass, but this calculated murder was no mistake. They had no intention of apprehending the victim, only to execute him in full public view.

It was either a psy-op to acclimate us to their new 'shoot-to-kill' powers, or as suggested, Jean Charles knew something potentially damaging to the Intelligence Services inside job on 7th July and had to be silenced.

Cop Out