rioting breaks at out rampART
rampart | 12.01.2006 16:06 | Analysis | Anti-racism | Culture | Free Spaces | Migration | Social Struggles | London | World
Tonight (thursday) the free weekly cinema at the rampART is showing films related to the french riots.
During the last few weeks these riots have been used to fuel race hatred by nationalist and other right wing scum in the hope of gaining power and influence for their fascist agenda.
In France, Le Pen's Front National party has been milking the situation for all it's worth and apparently gaining support. Opinion poll commissioned by the newspaper Le Monde, suggest that only 39 percent of the French now believe that the views of the Front National party, are "unacceptable." That suggests up to 61 percent, now see Le Pen as a legitimate political candidate, along with his policies of compulsory mass expulsion of immigrants, including children born in France.
Moreover, the ideas and resentments that underpin Le Pen's message have become widespread. Nearly three out of four (73%) declared that "the traditional values of France are not adequately protected." while almost two out of three (63%), said that there are too many immigrants in France.
Le Monde also reported another poll organized by France's National Commission for the Rights of Man. It was accompanied by a confidential report to the Minister of the Interior, noting that "the word 'racist' has been liberated." Indeed it appears that the word is no longer used with shame in France. The poll found that 33% of French adults used the word 'racist' to describe themselves (in rural districts the percentage is even higher at 48%!). In the same poll a year ago, only 25 percent would call themselves 'racist.'
The poll showed that the public acceptance of racist attitudes is strongest among men, the elderly, skilled workers, small business people, company heads and workers. The report concludes that, "the end of the taboo against racism is confirmed by the finding that 63 percent of respondents said that certain behavior (by immigrants) can justify racist reactions."
Slightly less than the previous poll, this one reported that 56% thought that there were too many immigrants in France - even immigrants saying the same apparently! France has the highest proportion of immigrants in Europe with some 10 percent of the population, mostly of Islamic backgrounds in North Africa.
Racism appears to be making gains around Europe. In Belgium, the successor to the Vlaams Blok party (a party banned two years ago for it's 'extremism'), has 18% of the vote and is the second largest party in the Flemish parliament. It is also the largest party on Antwerp city where 'Mohammed' is now the most common name in new registrations of births.
http://www.upi.com/InternationalIntelligence/view.php?StoryID=20051218-092936-9999r
In the UK, the British Nazi Party have also been striving to gain support for their fascist agenda by capitalising on peoples fear after the french riots. http://www.bnp.org.uk/columnists/brimstone2.php?leeId=66 All over the internet you can find right wing websites exploiting stories of gang rape of white women by muslims men in order to fuel the race hate that gives them power.
Where the riots in france really race riots by terrorist inspired muslim youth or simply a class issue of alienation, discrimination and poverty? Whatever the answer that fact remains that tensions are growing as the cap between the haves and have nots widens under global capitalism and as the worlds finite resources are squandered at an ever increasing pace.
During the last few weeks these riots have been used to fuel race hatred by nationalist and other right wing scum in the hope of gaining power and influence for their fascist agenda.
In France, Le Pen's Front National party has been milking the situation for all it's worth and apparently gaining support. Opinion poll commissioned by the newspaper Le Monde, suggest that only 39 percent of the French now believe that the views of the Front National party, are "unacceptable." That suggests up to 61 percent, now see Le Pen as a legitimate political candidate, along with his policies of compulsory mass expulsion of immigrants, including children born in France.
Moreover, the ideas and resentments that underpin Le Pen's message have become widespread. Nearly three out of four (73%) declared that "the traditional values of France are not adequately protected." while almost two out of three (63%), said that there are too many immigrants in France.
Le Monde also reported another poll organized by France's National Commission for the Rights of Man. It was accompanied by a confidential report to the Minister of the Interior, noting that "the word 'racist' has been liberated." Indeed it appears that the word is no longer used with shame in France. The poll found that 33% of French adults used the word 'racist' to describe themselves (in rural districts the percentage is even higher at 48%!). In the same poll a year ago, only 25 percent would call themselves 'racist.'
The poll showed that the public acceptance of racist attitudes is strongest among men, the elderly, skilled workers, small business people, company heads and workers. The report concludes that, "the end of the taboo against racism is confirmed by the finding that 63 percent of respondents said that certain behavior (by immigrants) can justify racist reactions."
Slightly less than the previous poll, this one reported that 56% thought that there were too many immigrants in France - even immigrants saying the same apparently! France has the highest proportion of immigrants in Europe with some 10 percent of the population, mostly of Islamic backgrounds in North Africa.
Racism appears to be making gains around Europe. In Belgium, the successor to the Vlaams Blok party (a party banned two years ago for it's 'extremism'), has 18% of the vote and is the second largest party in the Flemish parliament. It is also the largest party on Antwerp city where 'Mohammed' is now the most common name in new registrations of births.
http://www.upi.com/InternationalIntelligence/view.php?StoryID=20051218-092936-9999r
In the UK, the British Nazi Party have also been striving to gain support for their fascist agenda by capitalising on peoples fear after the french riots. http://www.bnp.org.uk/columnists/brimstone2.php?leeId=66 All over the internet you can find right wing websites exploiting stories of gang rape of white women by muslims men in order to fuel the race hate that gives them power.
Where the riots in france really race riots by terrorist inspired muslim youth or simply a class issue of alienation, discrimination and poverty? Whatever the answer that fact remains that tensions are growing as the cap between the haves and have nots widens under global capitalism and as the worlds finite resources are squandered at an ever increasing pace.
Free Community Cinema - Entry is free. Start of the films is 8pm sharp.
15 rampart street, london E! 2LA
www.rampart.co.nr
A history of violent clashes between French authorities and rioters from the "Battle of Algiers" about the Algeria's struggle for independence from France 1954-60 to the recent riots in France a couple of months ago. The feature film "Le Haine (The Hatred)" by Mathieu Kassovitz shows police brutality in the French suburbs.
Film Footage from the recent French riots (2005)
The 2005 civil unrest in France and neighboring countries was a series of riots and other forms of violent clashes between gangs of youths (predominantly of immigration background) and the French Police (as well as the police of neighboring countries). The riots, occurring simultaneously in various poor suburbs of large cities, mainly involved the burning of cars and public buildings as well as consequent clashes with police. The riots began on Thursday 27 October 2005 in the banlieues of Paris. They peaked on the night of 7 November, affecting 274 communes. On 8 November, President Jacques Chirac declared a state of emergency using a 1955 law. On 16 November, the French parliament approved a three-month extension of the state of emergency, which ended on the 4 January 2006. On 17 November, the French police declared a return to a normal situation throughout France, saying that the 98 vehicles torched the previous night corresponded to the usual average. According to the official count, 8,973 vehicles were torched during the 20 nights of rioting, with 2,888 arrests, and 126 police injured. On December 10, France's highest administrative body, the Council of State, ruled that the three-month state of emergency decreed to guarantee calm following unrest was legal. It rejected a complaint from 74 law professors (led by Frédéric Rolin) and the Green party, declaring that the conditions that led to the unrest, the quick spread of violence and the possibility that it could recur justify the state of emergency. The Council of State argued that "each night, between 40 to 60 cars are torched, and {that} we have to be cautious with New Year's Eve approaching". The complaint challenged the state of emergency's necessity, and said it compromised fundamental liberties
The Battle of Algiers (1965)
The film depicts an episode in the war of independence in the then French colony of Algeria, in the capital city of Algiers. It is loosely based on the account of one of the military commanders of the Algerian National Liberation Front (FLN), Saadi Yacef, in his memoir Souvenirs de la Bataille d'Alger. The book, written by Yacef while a prisoner of the French, was meant as propaganda to boost morale among FLN militants. After independence, Yacef was released and became a part of the new government. The Algerian government gave its backing to have a film version of his memoirs made, and he approached the Italian director Gillo Pontecorvo and screenwriter Franco Solinas with the proposed project. The two dismissed Yacef's initial treatment as too biased toward the Algerian side. While openly sympathetic with the cause of Algerian nationalism, they insisted on dealing with the events from a distanced point-of-view.
The film reconstructs the events of November 1954 to December 1960 in Algiers during the Algerian War of Independence, beginning with the organization of revolutionary cells in the Casbah. From there, it depicts a widening conflict between native Algerians and French colonists in which the two sides exchange acts of intensifying violence, leading to the introduction of French paratroopers to root out the FLN. The paratroops are depicted as "winning" the battle by neutralizing the whole FLN leadership through assassination or capture. However, the film ends with a coda, depicting demonstrations and rioting by native Algerians for independence, in which it is suggested that though the French have won the Battle of Algiers, they have lost a wider war.
The narrative is composed mostly by illustrations of the tactics of both the FLN insurgency and the French counter insurgency, as well as the uglier incidents in the national liberation struggle. It unflinchingly shows atrocities being committed by both sides against civilians. The FLN is shown taking over the Casbah through use of summary execution of native Algierian criminals and others considered traitors, as well as using terrorism to harass civilian French colonials. The French colonialists are shown using lynch mobs and indiscriminate violence against natives. Paratroops are shown employing torture, intimidation, and murder to combat the FLN and MNA insurgents.
Refraining from the conventions of the historical epic, Pontecorvo and Solinas chose not to focus the narrative on one protagonist, but several characters based on figures active in the conflict. The film begins and ends from the point of view of Ali la Pointe, played by Brahim Hagiag, who corresponds to the historical figure of the same name. He is a common criminal radicalized while in prison and is recruited to the FLN by military commander El-hadi Jafar, a fictionalized version of Saadi Yacef played by himself.
Other main protagonists include the young boy Petit Omar, a street urchin who serves as a messenger for the FLN; Larbi Ben M'hidi, one of the top leaders of the FLN, who is used in the film mainly to give the political rationale for the insurgency; Halima, Zohra, and Hassiba, a trio of female FLN militants called to carry out a revenge attack. In addition, The Battle of Algiers used thousands of Algerian extras in bit parts and crowd shots; the effect Pontecorvo intended was to create the impression of the Casbah's residents as a "choral" protagonist, communicating to the viewer through chanting, wailing, and physical affect.
The Algerian revolution has been called by many the bloodiest revolution in the history of the world and is often credited as the beginning of bloody post-World War II colonial revolutions, which also include the revolutions against the French in the Vietnam War. Although the revolutionary forces in Algiers were ultimately routed by the French Army, the long and bloody conflict throughout the country led to the French withdrawal from Algeria. This French loss was the first in a series of humiliating French defeats in colonial wars. As leftists, the theme of showing the inevitable demise of colonialism as an instrument of Western imperialism was central to Pontecorvo and Solinas's treatment of The Battle of Algiers.
Haine, La (1995)
It is a dark urban thriller which has been called France's answer to Do the Right Thing. It explores themes of racism, violence and disaffected youth in modern suburban Paris. A riot has broken out in a slum, and been quelled by the police. The film depicts 24 hours in the lives of three teenage friends in that slum.
Injured by a police inspector during an interrogation, Abdel is at a hospital, almost dead. In the suburbs where he lives, some riots happened during the night, and one policeman lost his gun. One of Abdel's friends, Vinz, finds it. He swears that if Abdel dies, he will shoot a policeman...
The film was a huge commercial success and provoked much debate in France over its unflinching presentation of urban and police violence. The then-prime minister Alain Juppé was reported to have arranged a special screening and ordered his entire cabinet to watch the film; police guards at the screening are said to have turned their backs on the film in protest of its portrayal of police brutality. Kassovitz won the Best Director award at the Cannes Film Festival in 1996 and the movie was nominated for the Palme d'Or; the film also picked up the César Award for Best Picture.
15 rampart street, london E! 2LA
www.rampart.co.nr
A history of violent clashes between French authorities and rioters from the "Battle of Algiers" about the Algeria's struggle for independence from France 1954-60 to the recent riots in France a couple of months ago. The feature film "Le Haine (The Hatred)" by Mathieu Kassovitz shows police brutality in the French suburbs.
Film Footage from the recent French riots (2005)
The 2005 civil unrest in France and neighboring countries was a series of riots and other forms of violent clashes between gangs of youths (predominantly of immigration background) and the French Police (as well as the police of neighboring countries). The riots, occurring simultaneously in various poor suburbs of large cities, mainly involved the burning of cars and public buildings as well as consequent clashes with police. The riots began on Thursday 27 October 2005 in the banlieues of Paris. They peaked on the night of 7 November, affecting 274 communes. On 8 November, President Jacques Chirac declared a state of emergency using a 1955 law. On 16 November, the French parliament approved a three-month extension of the state of emergency, which ended on the 4 January 2006. On 17 November, the French police declared a return to a normal situation throughout France, saying that the 98 vehicles torched the previous night corresponded to the usual average. According to the official count, 8,973 vehicles were torched during the 20 nights of rioting, with 2,888 arrests, and 126 police injured. On December 10, France's highest administrative body, the Council of State, ruled that the three-month state of emergency decreed to guarantee calm following unrest was legal. It rejected a complaint from 74 law professors (led by Frédéric Rolin) and the Green party, declaring that the conditions that led to the unrest, the quick spread of violence and the possibility that it could recur justify the state of emergency. The Council of State argued that "each night, between 40 to 60 cars are torched, and {that} we have to be cautious with New Year's Eve approaching". The complaint challenged the state of emergency's necessity, and said it compromised fundamental liberties
The Battle of Algiers (1965)
The film depicts an episode in the war of independence in the then French colony of Algeria, in the capital city of Algiers. It is loosely based on the account of one of the military commanders of the Algerian National Liberation Front (FLN), Saadi Yacef, in his memoir Souvenirs de la Bataille d'Alger. The book, written by Yacef while a prisoner of the French, was meant as propaganda to boost morale among FLN militants. After independence, Yacef was released and became a part of the new government. The Algerian government gave its backing to have a film version of his memoirs made, and he approached the Italian director Gillo Pontecorvo and screenwriter Franco Solinas with the proposed project. The two dismissed Yacef's initial treatment as too biased toward the Algerian side. While openly sympathetic with the cause of Algerian nationalism, they insisted on dealing with the events from a distanced point-of-view.
The film reconstructs the events of November 1954 to December 1960 in Algiers during the Algerian War of Independence, beginning with the organization of revolutionary cells in the Casbah. From there, it depicts a widening conflict between native Algerians and French colonists in which the two sides exchange acts of intensifying violence, leading to the introduction of French paratroopers to root out the FLN. The paratroops are depicted as "winning" the battle by neutralizing the whole FLN leadership through assassination or capture. However, the film ends with a coda, depicting demonstrations and rioting by native Algerians for independence, in which it is suggested that though the French have won the Battle of Algiers, they have lost a wider war.
The narrative is composed mostly by illustrations of the tactics of both the FLN insurgency and the French counter insurgency, as well as the uglier incidents in the national liberation struggle. It unflinchingly shows atrocities being committed by both sides against civilians. The FLN is shown taking over the Casbah through use of summary execution of native Algierian criminals and others considered traitors, as well as using terrorism to harass civilian French colonials. The French colonialists are shown using lynch mobs and indiscriminate violence against natives. Paratroops are shown employing torture, intimidation, and murder to combat the FLN and MNA insurgents.
Refraining from the conventions of the historical epic, Pontecorvo and Solinas chose not to focus the narrative on one protagonist, but several characters based on figures active in the conflict. The film begins and ends from the point of view of Ali la Pointe, played by Brahim Hagiag, who corresponds to the historical figure of the same name. He is a common criminal radicalized while in prison and is recruited to the FLN by military commander El-hadi Jafar, a fictionalized version of Saadi Yacef played by himself.
Other main protagonists include the young boy Petit Omar, a street urchin who serves as a messenger for the FLN; Larbi Ben M'hidi, one of the top leaders of the FLN, who is used in the film mainly to give the political rationale for the insurgency; Halima, Zohra, and Hassiba, a trio of female FLN militants called to carry out a revenge attack. In addition, The Battle of Algiers used thousands of Algerian extras in bit parts and crowd shots; the effect Pontecorvo intended was to create the impression of the Casbah's residents as a "choral" protagonist, communicating to the viewer through chanting, wailing, and physical affect.
The Algerian revolution has been called by many the bloodiest revolution in the history of the world and is often credited as the beginning of bloody post-World War II colonial revolutions, which also include the revolutions against the French in the Vietnam War. Although the revolutionary forces in Algiers were ultimately routed by the French Army, the long and bloody conflict throughout the country led to the French withdrawal from Algeria. This French loss was the first in a series of humiliating French defeats in colonial wars. As leftists, the theme of showing the inevitable demise of colonialism as an instrument of Western imperialism was central to Pontecorvo and Solinas's treatment of The Battle of Algiers.
Haine, La (1995)
It is a dark urban thriller which has been called France's answer to Do the Right Thing. It explores themes of racism, violence and disaffected youth in modern suburban Paris. A riot has broken out in a slum, and been quelled by the police. The film depicts 24 hours in the lives of three teenage friends in that slum.
Injured by a police inspector during an interrogation, Abdel is at a hospital, almost dead. In the suburbs where he lives, some riots happened during the night, and one policeman lost his gun. One of Abdel's friends, Vinz, finds it. He swears that if Abdel dies, he will shoot a policeman...
The film was a huge commercial success and provoked much debate in France over its unflinching presentation of urban and police violence. The then-prime minister Alain Juppé was reported to have arranged a special screening and ordered his entire cabinet to watch the film; police guards at the screening are said to have turned their backs on the film in protest of its portrayal of police brutality. Kassovitz won the Best Director award at the Cannes Film Festival in 1996 and the movie was nominated for the Palme d'Or; the film also picked up the César Award for Best Picture.
rampart
Comments
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments
Le Hain - great film, must see
12.01.2006 17:02
Le Haine is a masterpiece shot in black and white and following dreamlike the antics of three friends from the projects after a night of rioting. These young men reveal themselves to be bored, amoral, unlovable rouges who are rude thieving bastards. Nether-the-less, these petty villains are no worse than the other , such as the cops, with whom the trio come into contact. Hate feeds off of hate and we all know where it's leading.
dawn
The European Intifada is not a new phenomenon
12.01.2006 17:37
Four decades of teaching and cultivation have paid off. The student refugees who migrated from the Middle East forty years ago and their descendants now lead organizations that represent the local Muslim communities in their engagement with Europe's political elite. Funded by generous contributors from the Persian Gulf, they preside over a centralized network that spans nearly every European country.
Mainstream public face
These organizations represent themselves as mainstream, even as they continue to embrace the Brotherhood's radical views and maintain links to terrorists. With moderate rhetoric and well-spoken German, Dutch, and French, they have gained acceptance among European governments and media alike. Politicians across the political spectrum rush to engage them whenever an issue involving Muslims arises or, more parochially, when they seek the vote of the burgeoning Muslim community.
But, speaking Arabic or Turkish before their fellows Muslims, they drop their facade and embrace radicalism. While their representatives speak about interfaith dialogue and integration on television, their mosques preach hate and warn worshippers about the evils of Western society. While they publicly condemn the murder of commuters in Madrid and school children in Russia, they continue to raise money for Hamas and other terrorist organizations. Europeans, eager to create a dialogue with their increasingly disaffected Muslim minority, overlook this duplicity. The case is particularly visible in Germany, which retains a place of key importance in Europe; not only because of its location at the heart of Europe, but also because it played host to the first major wave of Muslim Brotherhood immigrants and is host to the best-organized Brotherhood presence. The German government's reaction is also instructive if only to show the dangers of accepting Muslim Brotherhood rhetoric at face value, without looking at the broader scope of its activities.
On February 20, 2004, DEBKA-Net-Weekly and DEBKAfile revealed that the whole of Western Europe had been penetrated by Al Qaeda terrorist cells preparing to unleash the European Intifada as part of the Global Jihad to establish the European Caliphate and Dar-Al-Islam.
Military style units
In the article it states that, “According to French counter-intelligence, Al Qaeda has recruited in France alone between 35,000 and 45,000 men and is organizing them into military-style units. They meet regularly for training in the use of weapons and explosives, combat tactics and indoctrination and are controlled from local and district command centres under the organization’s national French command.
In Germany, Al Qaeda has recruited 25,000 to 30,000 men. The British domestic intelligence agency MI5 estimates 10,000 faithful have joined up in Britain, providing Blunkett with more than ample cause for concern”.
On Thursday 18th November 2004 BBC Online news service ran a news report about terrorism in Iraq that stated that three French citizens were killed by Americans troops in Iraq whilst fighting for the insurgents. These were named as 24-year-old Tarek W, from Paris, killed on 17 September, 19-year-old Redouane el-Hakim, killed on 17 July and Abdel Halim Badjoudj, 19, killed on 20 October. As you can see from their names, they were Muslim immigrants living in France.
If you watched the media in both the UK and France then one would assume that the riots in France were solely an outbreak of communal youthful autumnal exuberance, similar to a rave but with petrol bombs instead of phat tunes shattering the calm and tranquillity of French streets. No doubt some French social worker or pet intellectual of the French Establishment is no doubt already preparing a thesis on how the ‘racist‘ French state that allowed the rioting scum to enter their country, take their homes, receive their welfare cheques and build their mosques and terror networks are really responsible for the violence and murder of 61 year old Jean-Jacques Le Chenadec who was beaten to death by a mob of immigrant Muslim teenagers.
No escape
The one small consolation that I get when I imagine the future of our Europe nations transformed into the nightmare state of Eurabia, is that after all the French Nationalists, Jews and homosexuals, Christians, Hindus, Pagans, Atheists and Communists have all been killed by the Muslim extremists - is that it will then be the turn of all those demented white liberals that defended the Islamic terrorist Al Qaeda Youth Brigades that began the European Intifada in 2005, to be dangling like so much dead meat from the street lights of Paris and Toulouse.
They, like us, will not escape the nightmare of Eurabia.
In the world of the media the fact that all of those ‘youths‘ who were shooting police officers, murdering old white men and setting alight disabled white women were all Black Muslims, Arab Muslims and other immigrant Muslims could not of course be mentioned. Just like the way the British public are patronised by the British media, then the French public must also given what is universally called the ‘Mushroom Treatment‘ by the French Media and kept in the dark and fed on bullshit not facts. For if the truth came out about the riots then the native French people might realise that they have been duped, deluded and deceived by their political masters and the media for decades, and then they may begin to vote for the Front National who have not lied to them for the last forty years. Even though the lie that we have been ‘ enriched‘ by immigration and immigrants is now as tattered and torn as the French flags which the Al Qaeda Youths Brigades burnt in the streets of France, it is still the only lie that matters to the liars that run our nations.
Religious cleansing
The riots are in fact the first shots to be fired in the European Intifada as part of the Global Jihad to establish the European Caliphate and Dar-Al-Islam. The riots are racist pogroms and outbreaks of Religious Cleansing to clear French whites / Christians from the inner city areas occupied by immigrant Muslim terrorists and their immigrant / white leftists sympathisers and to create autonomous immigrant only Muslim Zones where the writ of the French state and secular law no longer runs, but where Sharia Law and the Imam are the sovereign power on the streets.
This is easy to prove. The targets in these riots were not random, but deliberate and targeted. They were spread and organised as a show of strength against the French State and its methodology is both clear and far thinking. The fact that Primary Schools were burnt down by the rioters is due to the fact that the Muslim terrorist leaders in French communities have realised that in order to educate future generations of terrorists to overthrow the French state they need to remove Muslim children from the State education system that preaches a code of secularism and tolerance. The children that would have been educated in those primary schools will now be taught in the Mosques and the secret network of madrasses that exist in France will teach them their ideology of jihad instead. That way a generation of terrorists can be inculcated with the ideology of Intifada terror, trained in terrorism techniques and then sent out to fight for the European Caliphate when the time is ready.
Other targets were hit in order to remove Whites from those areas entirely. The burning down of white run and owned businesses and factories in inner city areas, that were run by Whites and staffed by Whites, means those businesses will no longer operate in those areas in future. This will ensure that the numbers of whites in those inner city areas will diminish as they will no longer be required to travel into those areas and work in those factories. No Muslim businesses were burned down in the riots which shows that this was the plan of the rioters.
The racist targeting of old white people, white businesses and white property in the riots will also cause the remaining whites in those areas to flee those areas and thereby allow in more Muslims to take over those abandoned homes thereby strengthening the power of the Muslim terrorists in those areas.
The youth have been taught to overcome their fear of the police in the riots, the youth who were most violent in the confrontations will now rise to the top of the ‘psycho league table‘ in the gangs in those areas thereby setting the standard for terror in the future and the White police have now been de-humanised in the minds of the youth and now made into moving targets for future confrontations.
War against the West
The July 7th terrorist attacks and the failed suicide bombings two weeks later, the French riots and the riots across Britain in 2000 are all part of a de-centralised but strategic, ideologically and theologically driven, war against the West. The terrorists have no central chain of command (nor do they need one) but instead operate by a unified methodology of terror by using the same techniques of terrorism, they share the same means in relation to how they have entered our country via immigration and they co-ordinate the war for Global Jihad by using the internet, the media and sympathetic individuals in mosques.
These Wahhabist fanatics are foaming at the mouth with hatred for West, yet their greatest defenders are the pet white liberals that can see no further than their own skin colour and the skin colour of the terrorists. Whilst the terrorists are preparing to wage war against us all, the white Liberal Elite traitors and the pathetic white Establishment are preparing to surrender us to them without a shot being fired back in our defence. The day will come when those White traitors and liberals that acted as the apologists for the European Intifada and deaths of innocent whites will face justice for their crimes against our people and civilisation.
The BNP is the last bastion of the defence of Western Civilisation and British culture in this country. Whilst the liberal filth that run this country prostrate themselves like dogs before any ethnic that mutters the magic word ‘ racism ‘ , only the BNP dare to stand against both them and the racist/ religious terrorists that have infiltrated and are poisoning our nation.
If these riots had broke out in Britain, and the BNP were in charge of the country at that time, then I would have asked the Party to pass the following preventive measures:
1) A curfew would be imposed and all those immigrants or descendants of immigrants arrested in any rioting would be deported immediately to their ancestral homelands (as defined by their or their parents / grandparents nationality) and their British passports revoked.
2) The police would have been instructed to liaise with the National and Border Security Police Force that we intend to set up and to use non-deadly force including rubber bullets, night time curfews, tear gas, snatch squads and preventive arrest (based on intelligence) against the rioters. Those that fired guns against the police in riots would be liable to be shot dead by trained police marksmen operating in those units.
3) Local home owners / business owners would have been authorised to use force to defend their homes and property – and no criminal charges would be laid against them in relation to any rioters killed in the execution of any attacks on their home or property.
4) All religious institutions and individuals linked with those institutions suspected of involvement in organising or supporting the riots would be shut down and the leaders of those establishments deported.
5) The media would be barred from areas where riots were under way, as the media in France are being used to spread details of how the rioters were operating (thereby encouraging copy cat incidents elsewhere). The media in France have not been reporting objective facts about the riots (the same as the British media did not in relation to the riots in Britain in 2000) such as their ethnic identities, real causes of the riots and their religion and instead have been acting as apologists for the rioters – and therefore the rioters and the media are all part a synergistic process of violence/ apologist statements and proliferation. The media are the mechanism whereby riots spread across countries – and therefore the media will be required to file their reports via a State Information System that provides them with information rather than make up lies to support their own political agendas. The fact that the media have not once reported the racist nature of the attacks upon elderly whites in the French riots shows the racist nature of the French media and also the clear political nature of the media itself. Those journalists that break the law in this respect and report false facts relating to those riots will be arrested and jailed for ‘Inciting Disorder’.
The head of one of France's major news services has even admitted censoring coverage of the French riots that would have revealed the ethnic makeup of the rioters because he feared the Front National would benefit from more comprehensive coverage.
Media cover-up
Jean-Claude Dassier, chief executive of news channel LCI, has also complained that other broadcasters' coverage of the unrest had been "excessive" and may even have encouraged rioters. He said " Politics in France is heading to the right and I don't want rightwing politicians back in second, or even first place because we showed burning cars on television," he told a conference in Amsterdam. The idea that a single, unelected, media hack can dictate what information the entire French people and French nation receive about the riots shows the criminal power of the media. He continues saying that "Journalism is not simply a matter of switching on the cameras and letting them roll. You have to think about what you're broadcasting," he added. In other words, unless what you show on the media supports the current political elite and their failed ideological solutions then it should not be shown even if the truth has to be hidden and the lie become the public reality.
In modern consumer societies all of politics is based solely on perceptions we as individuals have about our society and our nation. These perceptions about our society derive almost totally from the news media, as most of us are not in a position to be able to travel around our countries finding about what is really going in every community all of the time. Therefore what the media says is going on in our country forms the basis of who we vote for and why we are voting for them. The media control our democracy, not the politicians, as what the media says is happening in our nations forms the motivation for individuals to vote for particular political parties. The social consensus in all nations is a product of the media.
All political parties depend upon the media to support them in order to get power, and then once in power those political parties pass laws that give tax breaks and other benefits to those media groups that support them, thereby showing the innate corrupt nature of our so called 'democratic nations' and democratic systems. Only when the power of the media over peoples minds is broken, will true democracy arise in our nations.
The media are utterly unaccountable to any one other than their owners belying the democratic deficit in modern societies. Only when the media are forced only to tell the truth about what is happening, and not manipulate the news in order to get public support for the political parties that they ' sponsor ' and advertise in their papers, will we live in a true democracy.
Censorship
For media journalists like Dassier, denying French citizens news footage and facts about what's happening in their own country isn't enough : No-Pasaran reports that more than a week ago, LCI and its parent company TF1 suspended the comments sections on their news reports internet sites as the comments were not 'liberal' enough for the media owners to allow on their site. Comments supporting a tough law-and-order line against the rioters outnumbered messages from those sympathising or calling for understanding ten to one. Therefore this support for non media anointed policies meant those comments had to be censured to ensure the social temperature stayed the same. Multi-Cultural tolerance and liberalism are not derived from human nature, but only via the false social consensus created by the media.
LCI-TCF is not alone: Radio broadcaster France Inter has also warned of the need to "constantly put the events into perspective" Other journalists and broadcast executives spoke of how they have limited images of violence. These admissions will be regarded by future generations as the crime against our peoples that will one day have to be addressed. The media traitors that tell lies to our people in order to leave them defenceless and weak against those inner criminals that are attacking us, are the inner enemy that must be exorcised from our democracies before a true National Community can be born.
It is time now for the West and all democrats to face down the growing Islamic extremist monster in our midst. The Liberal Elite and their policies have failed. The same white criminals that allowed them into our nations are now appeasing the same terrorists they imported into our nations when they terrorise us.
I want everyone who reads this article to remember the name of the old white pensioner Jean-Jacques Le Chenadec, 61, who was beaten into a coma north of Paris by a mob of Muslim immigrant filth and died of his injuries in hospital. Whilst the anti-white racist French media carry on demanding the French State appease the ethnic criminal filth that killed him his blood is the crime that the rioters and the media are both complicit in.
M
Rioting solves nothing!
14.01.2006 13:12
Concerned
Concerned over what?
14.01.2006 16:11
Incidentally, Algeria did gain independece and you've been somewhat selective with your list of examples in order to 'prove' your point.
Also, the state teaches us that might makes right so you can hardly blame people for having a go.
who said rioting was a solution to anything?
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments