Daddy, what did you do in 2006? I IMPEACHED TONY BLAIR!

Matthew Edwards | 09.01.2006 22:17

...

LET'S BUILD A MOVEMENT!

http://www.impeachblair.org/

General Sir Michael Rose, former UN commander in Bosnia, calls for Blair's impeachment over Iraq:

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/09012006/344/call-impeach-blair-iraq-war.html

Abramoff and DeLay gone. Who is next?

Matthew Edwards
e-mail: matthewedwards999@yahoo.co.uk

Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

Saddam had to be removed, he was a murderous madman.

10.01.2006 09:36

Saddam Hussein was a murderous madman, he had to be removed from power. During Saddam's 24 year rule he waged two wars one against Iran and one against Kuwait. Hundreds of thousands died or were tortured to death and four million fled Iraq as refugees.

Tony Blair has already admitted that he was wrong of the information about Iraqs' weapons of mass destruction but quite rightly says that he refuses to appolagise for removing Saddam from power. Thanks to Tony Blair and George Bush Iraq is now a democracy and Saddam and his murderous henchmen are in jail undergoing trial for crimes against humanity.

Concerned

Blair is a Madman

10.01.2006 10:38

Tony Blair is a murderous madman, he has to be removed from power. During Tony's nine year rule he waged three wars, one against the Balkans, one against Afghanistan and one against Iraq. Hundreds of thousands died or were tortured to death and he maimed thousands more civilians, with D.U and W.P.

Tony Blair has already admitted that he was wrong on the information about Iraqs' weapons of mass destruction but quite arrogantly says that he refuses to apologise for illegally removing Saddam from power. Thanks to Tony Blair and George Bush, Iraq is now on the brink of civil war. Tony should be in jail with Saddam and his murderous henchmen undergoing trial for crimes against humanity.

Dito

Impeach Sir Humphrey

10.01.2006 14:35

Those that shout for impeachment are the ones that condone terrorist actions. Regardless of what people think, any prime minister can only go on the information that is put before him, so based on that fact it should be the sinister civil servants that produce that information that should be impeached and not Tony Blair.

SpookWatch

Spookwatch the fool

10.01.2006 16:33

Erm, except for the fact that the security services kept stressing that their "intelligence" was patchy, unreliable and speculative - it took the likes of Alistair Campbell (under orders from Blair who had already agreed to join Bush's attack on Iraq a year beforehand) to "sex it up" and turn it into a fake case for invasion based on a "threat" to Britain from WMDs.

Spookwatchwatch

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Tony Blair's wars were wars of liberation not conquest though

10.01.2006 18:39

Quote: "Tony Blair is a murderous madman, he has to be removed from power. During Tony's nine year rule he waged three wars, one against the Balkans,"

Yes to defend Kosovo Albanians from ethnic cleansing by Serbian armed forces. This war also encouraged the Serbian people to rise up and overthrow Milosevic a few months later after his policy of creating a greater Serbia had proved a complete disaster. Serbia is now a free democracy and Milosevic is in prison for crimes against humanity.

"one against Afghanistan"

Yes because the Taliban regime was the worldwide headquarters of Al Qaeda who murdered 3,000 Americans on September the 11th 2001. Al Qaeda terrorist training bases were there and so was Osama Bin Laden. The Taliban could also have avoided war had they handed over Bin Laden as requested.

"and one against Iraq."

Only after 12 years of giving Iraq numerous chances to comply with UN resolutions ordering it to allow complete access to all areas of Iraq to UN weapons inspectors so that they could search for and destroy all chemical, biological and long range missiles. The war when it came was hardly a war at all tens of thousands of Iraqi troops qued up to surrender to allied forces and deaths and casualties for the three week war were relatively light. The Iraqis are also far better off now than they ever were under Saddam's brutal rule.

Concerned

Investigate, Impeach, Imprison

11.01.2006 01:05

"Those that shout for impeachment are the ones that condone terrorist actions."

No, they are the ones trying to hold the world's greatest terrorists accountable for their actions.
Why are you an apologist for them and their crimes?

"Regardless of what people think, any prime minister can only go on the information that is put before him"

Right, and leaked documents long ago proved that both Bush and Bliar knew that there were no Iraqi WMD's. It was simply a charade used to feign a justification for a war they knew full well to be illegal, that was planned years in advance.

When these criminals are finally held to account, the BILLIONS they've plundered should also be immediately seized, and resturned to the Iraqi People, in the name of "rebuilding" their broken nation.

Guilty As Charged

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments