Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

"Iran: Muslims hang teen girls, plan another"

Anti-Fanatic | 09.01.2006 16:53 | Culture | Gender | Repression | London | World

She had no lawyer. She tried to defend herself. In the end the government took her to the noose. She was hung. The 16-year-old body was accused of committing "acts incompatible with chastity."

Her family tried to defend her. The court would have none of it.

Atefeh Rajabi was put to death after a "sham trial," according to Iran Focus.

She said in her report to the Islamic legalistic radical judge that "he should punish those who force women into adultery, not the victims." Her words fell on deaf ears, as if often the case in Muslim countries where women are worse than dung.

She was taken to the gallows, hung in public in the northern town of Neka.

Such is life and death in Iran.

In another case involving Delara Darabi, she was charged with murder. She, a teen-ager, will hang according to the court’s decision in Rasht, northern Iran. She denied the charges.

In still another incident, Nazanin, the victim of an attack, tried to defend herself against rapists. The Muslim males also tried to rape her niece who was with her at the time.

Etemaad, the state-run newspaper, reported that the 18-year-old "confessed to stabbing one of three men who had attacked the pair along with their boyfriends while they were spending some time in a park west of the Iranian capital in March 2005."

In the fracas, the boy friends got on their motorbikes and fled, leaving the two girls defenseless. With that, rapists proceeded with their attacks.

Three Muslims "pushed her and her 16-year-old niece Somayeh onto the ground and tried to rape them." She then took a knife, stabbing one of the men’s hand. The men continued with the attack.

As the girls attempted to run from the park, the men bodily got hold of them again. Nazanin then stabbed one of the men in the chest. "The teenage girl broke down in tears in court as she explained that she had no intention of killing the man but was merely defending herself and her younger niece from rape."

The decision of the court? Nazanin will be hanged to death.

Such is life and death in Iran.

 http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/swank010906.htm

Anti-Fanatic

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

Yet more racist shit.

09.01.2006 19:27

Yet more racist shit on indymedia. If you want a war with iran, why don't you join the army? Because you are a fucking racist coward, thats why not.

anti-racist.


What we need...

09.01.2006 19:33

is a regime change, or religion changed to something less vicious

johnny english


following that link

09.01.2006 19:39

following that link canadafreepress.com what a joke its a right wing religous site quote
"That is why freedom-based national leaders must realize that we free peoples are fighting a killing cult, not a politic. There is a vast difference. We are in war against the devil and his disciples. Period. Just as we were with atheistic Communism."  http://truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
which links to
 http://www.mosquewatch.com/ which says there is no war on terrorism without a war on Islam

all journos listed in  http://www.canadafreepress.com/contact.htm are right wing scum

catz


Following that link

09.01.2006 21:36

Clarification about the "War on Terror." There is no such thing. We are not fighting terror because terror is the tool of the enemy, Muslim terrorists.We are indeed fighting a war against the Islamic ideology.

America in its inception was fighting the Barbary pirates who were Muslims demanding ransom money to stop plundering ships. Now who's fault was that, and were we fighting them for oil, or American foreign policy to Israel ? Certainly not, we were fighting the mujahadin that wanted to plunder, rape, burn, steal, and kill for Allah.

I see no need to use a catch phrase created by politicians who are afraid to speak the truth. And for the race card being played, drop it. This has nothing to do with skin pigmentation, it has to do with the teachings of Islam.

Jeff'


Jeff


Disgusting hypocrite

10.01.2006 15:58

The Barbary pirates, "killing for Allah"? Are you a liar, or an idiot?

The US has only ever fought Muslims when it suited its purposes to do so. You still shovel huge piles of cash, intel and military help to murderers, torturers and dictators in regimes like Saudi, Indonesia, Uzbekistan and Turkey, just like you shoveled them to Saddam back when he was still obeying your orders.

Even Bush has finally admitted you've killed 30 thousand civilian men women and children in Iraq:
 http://iraqbodycount.net/

Murderous, lying scum like you get exactly what you deserve:
 http://www.awitness.org/journal/real_iraq_war.html

Mick