Skip to content or view screen version

police clearly told to ignore carol singing protest in parliament square

rikki | 21.12.2005 22:51 | Repression | London

police pointedly ignored investigating possible crimes this evening in parliament square when the 'serious organised crime and police act' was once again challenged by brian haw, maya evans and others. the event was called by tim ireland (www.bloggerheads.com) and raised money for 'medical aid for iraqi children'.

carol singers
carol singers

maya evans and brian haw
maya evans and brian haw

copper ignoring it all
copper ignoring it all

more singers
more singers

this cop can't resist a peek - hope he doesn't get into trouble!
this cop can't resist a peek - hope he doesn't get into trouble!

maya and friends
maya and friends


although for the most part, the carol singing was just that, at one point a megaphone was used (in total contravention of the socpa law) and brian haw made a short political speech which resulted in crowd shouting for freedom and peace, again clearly in defiance of the law banning spontaneous protest in the exclusion zone around parliament.

the police were notable by their absence. on every other occasion when any sort of group has gathered in the square, either community support officers or police have come to investigate and see if any crime was being committed under the controversial section 132 of the law.

on several of the sunday afternoon picnics (which will be continuing at one o clock every sunday in the new year) police decided that they 'believed' a demonstration was going on, and arrested participants or threatened arrest.

when cindy sheehan, the american peace activist, came to visit brian haw recently, police used the law to threaten supporters who were clearly not demonstrating, but this then triggered a demonstration and procession up to the gates of downing street where a noisy protest continued without arrests.

with recent media interest and coverage of this ridiculous law, it seems that decisions about arrests are based on the likelihood of adverse media coverage. once they realised who cindy sheehan was, they clearly backed down despite having given ultimatums and stern warnings. tonight's carol gathering would likewise have gained huge media interest had there been any arrests, and so the police were clearly ordered to ignore the event.

a small group of community support officers lurked under an archway across the road junction, and police walked in front of parliament, studiously avoiding even looking at what was going on (although one officer broke rank and had a sneaky gander). meanwhile, brian made his speech to a hundred or more supporters, a megaphone was briefly used, and fliers for sunday picnics were handed out, all in flagrant breach of the law.

but don't think for one moment that the police have decided not to enforce this terrible law. they just pick softer, less media-attractive targets. yesterday a lone protester, margaret tucker, was taken away by police for standing near parliament with a banner stating 'i am not the serious organised criminal'.

maya evans was found guilty under the law recently and given a 12 month conditional discharge and ordered to pay £100 costs. more than twenty others have been charged under the law, and the first of these cases will be heard on the 9th and the 18th of january in the new year. maya will be appealing her conviction and looks likely to go straight to the high court with this battle. as long as the police continue to act so arbitrarily in enforcement, the law looks shakier and shakier in court. the battle is on. the challenges keep coming. there is much confidence that this draconian legislation will be made unworkable and eventually overturned.

www.peopleincommon.org welcomes any ideas for imaginative challenges to this law, and they hold an open picnic every sunday afternoon in parliament square to discuss and act upon ideas to undermine this legislation.

other information can be found at:

www.parliament-square.org.uk
www.j-n-v.org.uk

rikki

Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

The ban on hunting is in breach of human rights too

22.12.2005 10:36

A concerted and wholly unjustified political attack on hunting, has somehow commandeered the heights of the Parliamentary agenda. It is not we, nor the electorate, but our politicians who have prioritised this as a rural 'issue'. We have no option but to defend this important and beneficial aspect of rural life with as much intensity and energy as the politicians, and the animal rights lobby groups who support them, are expending in their misplaced attacks.

The campaign team works closely with all other parts of the Alliance and with the Council of Hunting Associations (CHA) to: educate and inform key audiences, and through them the public, about the facts on hunting, especially through our 'Hunting in the Community' programme and 'Hunting the Future' youth education initiative; to respond to and counter threats to hunting from whatever source, including from government, politicians and hostile pressure groups; and to promote openness, standards of conduct and accountability amongst the community hunting itself.
 http://www.countrysidealliance.org.uk/

Countryside Alliance


To the Countryside Alliance

22.12.2005 13:22

Christmas greetings to the Countryside Alliance!

Many of us on the left disagree with what you say - but many would nonetheless fight relentlessly for your right to say it. Free speech covers your right to protest the ban on foxhunting wherever and whenever you want to.

I, and many others I know on the left, were appalled that one of your members was arrested for wearing a T-shirt saying "Bollocks to Blair". If there is one sentiment that can unite the Anti-War movement and the Countryside Alliance, it has to be this one! Free speech is the last remaining line of defence, and it's bigger than our differences.

Would you be prepared to start a dialogue?

Boadicea


Unity

22.12.2005 17:30

Unite with the Countryside Alliance? Shall we get the BNP on board as well while we're at it?

Rachel


Left and right are meaningless here...

22.12.2005 19:05

I vaguely remember a Shakespeare quotation about conflict bringing together unlikely bedfellows.

e.g. The US govt/military were on the side of the famous Socialist Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war.

I've thought for some time that the countryside alliance and the antriwar movement have a common cause (freedom to protest) - and they should work together.

Copernicus


heling put the C**t back in countryside

22.12.2005 20:37


be under no illusions about the CA. Their agenda is based purley around the mass slaughter of a variety of innocent animals. Anyone who has ever been on a sab will attest to the fact that these bastards have NO CONCEPT of peoples freedom to protest. Sabs get beaten week in week out, and two are dead because of CA supporters intolerance to views other than their own. Siding with them is one of the stupidest ideas i have ever heard. They are enemies of the animals, of free speech and actions, and hence, enemies of ours! Whats next, siding with RESPECT!!!!!!!!!!!

(A) Sab

a Sab


Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments