Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

NO PUBLIC ENQUIRY FOR 7/7 BOMBINGS

Bullshit-Detector | 13.12.2005 23:35 | Repression

Clarke rules out July 7 inquiry

There will be no public inquiry into the July 7 terrorist atrocities in London, the Home Office has confirmed.

A spokesperson said: "The Government is not proposing to hold a public inquiry into the events of July 7."

The BBC have reported that the government will instead publish a report based upon information from police and the security services, and civil servants. All very suspicious. It has been denounced by the Muslim association of Britain.

For a more valid intepretation of what happened on 7/7/05, here are some good sources of information:

http://bridgetdunnes.blogspot.com/
www.officialconfusion.com

Bullshit-Detector

Comments

Hide the following 16 comments

So What?

14.12.2005 00:53

The press are idiots, they read the publsihed timetable and assumed the bombers caught the 7.40 or 7.48 train which they didn't realise had been cancelled. In fact the bombers were pictured at Luton at 7.21 so they probably caught the earlier train.

Simple explanation = no conspiracy theory required

But then it's not as much fun for you then is it?

Paul

London 7/7: How to be Good - Part 1

14.12.2005 01:02

If the government won't conduct a public inquiry into the day about which both the media and the authorities have lied and misled the public since the day it happened, then it is down to the people of the country to conduct a people's inquiry.

Since the facts about the actual train times of the Thameslink and underground trains on the morning of 7 July were discovered by independent public researchers, every single member of the British public has an opportunity to hold the media - and ultimately the authorities who are already imbroiled in the web of lies they spun about the police murder of an innocent man - to account for their ongoing factual inaccuracies in relation to the day when we are told 52 people died and 700 were injured at the hands of four, young, British-born Muslim suicide bombers.

London 7/7: How to Be Good - Part 1

http://antagonise.blogspot.com/2005/11/london-77-how-to-be-good-part-1.html

As The Antagonist says, "It has to start somewhere, it has to start sometime. What better place than here? What better time than now?"

Tim Osman
Homepage: http://antagonise.blogspot.com/2005/11/london-77-how-to-be-good-part-1.html

Paul

14.12.2005 05:29

'So What?
14.12.2005 00:53

The press are idiots, they read the publsihed timetable and assumed the bombers caught the 7.40 or 7.48 train which they didn't realise had been cancelled. In fact the bombers were pictured at Luton at 7.21 so they probably caught the earlier train.

Simple explanation = no conspiracy theory required

But then it's not as much fun for you then is it?'

======================================

What proof do yu have they caught the 7.21 train? Or are u satisified to provide unsubstantiated explanations as evidence?

brian

Just Like 911

14.12.2005 06:16

The Cover-Up is proof of a cover-up.

Like the Bush/PNAC Regime and the singular 911 Conspiracy Theory upon which it's launched its preconceived agenda of Fascist Madness (Rebuilding America's Defenses - www.newamericancentury.org), which it has been unable to support with key and compelling evidence in over four years, the Bliars would support theirs if they could.

See A Pattern?

NO GOVT ENQUIRY HERE, MOVE ALONG NOW...

14.12.2005 08:42

"There will be no public inquiry into the 7 July London bombings which killed 52 people, the Home Office has said."

"Ministers will instead publish a definitive account of what happened in a written narrative."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4526604.stm

Presumably this written narrative is to take the form of a fairy story where all the good children of the nation will be told about the horrid Islamic terrorists who constantly slip through our borders to terrorize us ...

What other western European country would accept the highly dubious circumstances in which 52 innocent folk were killed by so-called terrorists and not insist on an independent public inquiry?

What is the Bliar trying to conceal this time? That the bomb-attack was Britain's 911 and as we ALL KNOW WHO DID THAT without any proper inquiry we certainly don't want one now?

Pull the other one, Bliar, you've been sussed. (He'll be a tad too young to remember a popular East European anecdote from Stalin's time which went along the lines of, "whatever you hear from the government media, believe the opposite and you won't be far wrong.")

mr underhill

Peoples Inquiry

14.12.2005 09:51

A Peoples Inquiry is the way to go. It is essential that the bombers, who may be in 'paradise', are questioned thouroughly about their actions, using mediums etc to contact them

7 rails

Quite so - however

14.12.2005 10:00

The point is, Paul, that the press and police are sticking to their cock and bull tale(s). Should the light of a public inquiry be shone on their nonsense, the whole edifice they have built and delivered to a gullible, racist British public would fall apart at the first hurdle, the non-existent 7.40 train. This “narrative” that the PM wishes to foist upon us is on a par with the WMD “narrative”, the Kelly suicide “narrative”, the terrorist Brazilian “narrative”, the bombs in a bathtub “narrative” and so on. Here’s one for you, Paul-when was the last time a sitting PM in Britain brushed aside a public inquiry as being ‘a ludicrous distraction’(his words of the day), and offered instead in its place a “government narrative”?

Come back Mr. Orwell, now we begin to understand you.

jimbo

Same old tosh!

14.12.2005 10:30

Again, the "Tim Osman" story originates from this single source:

http://orlingrabbe.com/homepage.html

Please not that he regularly features pictures of you naked girls and features on teenage sexuality that are dubious in the extreme.

If these are you sources than your idea of an investigation isn't worth a fart in the bath!

Move along please. Nothing to see here.

14.12.2005 11:21

Two proven Bliars are involved with the explosions of 7 July. They have decided to tell you a story about that day. Are you sitting comfortably children? Jackanory, Jackanory, Jackanory.

More along please. Nothing to be seen here.

Move along please. No nail varnish remover (acetone) to be seen here.

Move along please. No cover-up and fit-up to be seen here.

Move along please. No treason to be seen here.

Move along please. Nothing to be seen here...

What a surprise

14.12.2005 11:34

Narrative noun 1.a description of events, especially in a novel. 2. the act, process or skill in telling a story. Oxford advanced learners dictionary.
They are being blatant to the point of insult.

The point is, Paul, that the press and police are sticking to their cock and bull tale(s). Should the light of a public inquiry be shone on their nonsense, the whole edifice they have built and delivered to a gullible, racist British public would fall apart at the first hurdle, i.e. the non-existent 7.40am train. This “narrative” that the PM wishes to foist upon us is on a par with the WMD “narrative”, the Kelly suicide “narrative”, the terrorist Brazilian “narrative”, the bombs in a bathtub “narrative” and so on.

Here’s one for you Paul - when was the last time a sitting PM in Britain brushed aside a public inquiry as being ‘a ludicrous distraction’(his words of the day), and offered instead in its place, a “government narrative”?

Come back Mr. Orwell, now we begin to understand you.

jimbo

Move along please. Nothing to see here.

14.12.2005 12:26

Are you siitting comfortably children? Then I'll begin.

Jackanory. Jackanory. Jackanory.

Move long please. Nothing to see here.

No nail varnish remover (acetone) to be seen here. Move along please.

No TATP to be seen here. No HMTD or even HMDT to be seen here. Move along please.

No cover-up to be seen here. No FIT-up to be seen here.

No treason to be seen here.

No unlawfull killings to be seen here.

Move along please.

deep

I've tried to post this three times in four hours, so here goes again

14.12.2005 12:46

Narrative noun 1.a description of events, especially in a novel. 2. the act, process or skill in telling a story. Oxford advanced learners dictionary.
They are being blatant to the point of insult.

The point is, Paul, that the press and police are sticking to their cock and bull tale(s). Should the light of a public inquiry be shone on their nonsense, the whole edifice they have built and delivered to a gullible, racist British public would fall apart at the first hurdle, i.e. the non-existent 7.40am train. This “narrative” that the PM wishes to foist upon us is on a par with the WMD “narrative”, the Kelly suicide “narrative”, the terrorist Brazilian “narrative”, the bombs in a bathtub “narrative” and so on. Here’s one for you Paul - when was the last time a sitting PM in Britain brushed aside a public inquiry as being ‘a ludicrous distraction’(his words of the day), and offered instead in its place, a “government narrative”?

Come back Mr. Orwell, now we begin to understand you.

jimbo

Move along please. nothing to be seen here.

14.12.2005 15:46

Move along please. Nothing to see here.*

* "Move along please. Nothing to see here." is the phrase UK policemen
use when they want you to move along and not see anything.

No inquiry into 7 July bombings

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4526604.stm

Instead of an inquiry we are to be told a tale by a senior civil
servant. Nobody trusts the our glorious war leader Blair any
more. That's why he had to say "It's not me asking for these powers,
it's the police." Trouble is Liar Bliar's Liar Blair has been exposed
as a Bliar. It's difficult to see any difference between them.

Snake oil from the cobra.

Are you sitting comfortably children? Then I'll begin.

Move along please. Nothing to see here. No nail varnish remover to
see here. No TATP, no HMTD, not even HMDT. No smoke without fire. And
you expect us to believe your bullshit?

Move along please. Nothing to see here. No cover-up. No FIT-up. No
treason. No manufactured fear, terror and lies.

Move along please. Nothing to see here. No eminent chemist.

Move along please. Nothing to see here. No lies discernible hear.

Don't you believe those that have been chosen to govern?

Don't you believe Blair and Blair and Straw?

It's too big. There is too much here. Too many people know or are
so close to the truth. And you hope to keep this quiet by telling a
story? We've had plenty of your fairy tales already.

There is too much at stake. To blame innocent British nationals. To
stoke the fires of racial hatred. To cause hatred and warfare. To
carry on this sham of a war on terrorism. Blair and Blair, you are
evil fascist bastards. You are cursed.

My suggestion to Blair and Blair is suicide.

"You support terrorists. You support terrorists."

Hold on a second. You are terrorists. You are terrorists.

deep

...

14.12.2005 19:07

please take your conspiracy fantasies elsewhere. This is not a venue for them.

You Mean The "Arabs Are Evil" Fantasy?

14.12.2005 20:30

The Cover-Up itself is proof of a cover-up.

Like the Bush/PNAC Regime and its singular 911 Conspiracy Theory, upon which it's launched a preconceived agenda of Fascist Madness (Rebuilding America's Defenses - www.newamericancentury.org), which it has been unable to support with key and compelling evidence in over four years, the Bliars would support theirs if they could.

The point is that they cannot, and they have barred any investigation into the event, which should just be second-nature when such a tregdy occurs. If not, what are you paying taxes for?

Bliar then said that the bombs mysteriously left unexploded on on 7/21 would be used to track down the culprits, but too many people pointed out that they were probably planted, a possible witness was shot nine times (seven bullets to the head) by a still-unidentified man, and the police LIED about it, and still, the evidence to support the 7/7 Conspiracy Theory is missing.

And still, Bliar used the tragedy to seize for himself unprecedented powers, those which had been kept from him by the British Courts for four years.

Just like Bush and 911 ...

Spook Presence On These Threads Is Interesting

Jordan

14.12.2005 21:01

http://dictionary.reference.com/search/?q=paranoia