Skip to content or view screen version

Pentagon Black Ops: Abducting Peacemakers in Iraq

Kurt Nimmo | 30.11.2005 19:43

The question to keep in mind here is "Qui Bono?".
Who benefits?

Pentagon Black Ops: Abducting Peacemakers in Iraq
Kurt Nimmo, Another day in the empire

Npvember 29, 2005

It is possible Norman Kember is a spy, as charged by the Swords of Righteousness brigade in Iraq. However, considering the work of the Christian Peacemaker organization and the fact Kember is 74 years old, it is unlikely he is a spy. Kember and three other Christian peace activists were abducted by the unknown terrorist group and a videotape of them was released yesterday. "Family and friends of Mr. Kember, a grandfather who lives with his wife Pat in Pinner, north-west London, appealed to the kidnappers to release him last night," reports the Guardian.

"The Rev Alan Betteridge, from the Fellowship of Reconciliation, of which Mr. Kember is a member, said he was a 'genuine peace activist’… Mr. Kember, who campaigned against the war in Iraq, was seized on Saturday from a mosque he was visiting in a Sunni area of western Baghdad with the three other hostages. It has been reported that they were talking to Muslim clerics about the abuse of Sunni detainees," more than enough reason for Kember to be abducted by black op "insurgents" who " just grabbed" the name Swords of Righteousness "out of the air, a tactic which goes back to Beirut," according to the Guardian. It should be remembered that the Italian journalist Giuliana Sgrena was also kidnapped as she prepared to interview survivors of Fallujah, now admitted to have been attacked with chemical weapons and a napalm derivative.

One look at the CPT (Christian Peacemaker Teams) in Iraq website and it becomes obvious who abducted Kember and his associates and why. CPT has worked as "an alternative voice to the reporters 'embedded’ with Coalition forces," have used "their bodies to protect critical civilian infra-structure such as water treatment facilities, electrical plants, and hospitals," have documented "abuse of detainees by Coalition forces," and "have ventured forth in response to urging from Iraqi human rights workers in Karbala." No doubt all of this Christian activity sincerely upsets the Pentagon and the Bushcons.

In December, 2004, CPT was "compelled" to "severely curtail its size and visibility" due to kidnappings of foreign aid workers. It appears the Swords of Righteousness brigade, unheard of before Kember and the three other CPT members were snatched, was created in order to deliver a coup de grâce to CPT, a sincerely Christian organization initiated "by Mennonites, Brethren and Quakers with broad ecumenical participation."

CPT’s ministry is a "Biblically-based and spiritually-centered peacemaking" effort that "emphasizes creative public witness, nonviolent direct action and protection of human rights," that it to say it is diametrically opposed to the Bushian version of Christianity—a Manichean, Christian Zionist, Islamophobic, misanthropic, and paranoid non-religion designed to punish Arabs and Muslims the same way Likudite Zionists have punished (and methodically continue to commit slow genocide) against the Palestinians and other Arabs considered to be sub-human and thus expendable. In fact, the Bushian Christian Zionists have embraced Zionist brutality in their quest (or rather modern-day Crusade) to support their idealized version of Israel as portrayed in their take on the Bible and the Second Coming of Christ (in the Christian Zionist political-religious take on the Second Coming and premillennialism, the Jews of Israel either accept Jesus as their savior or burn in the fires of Hell with the rest of us—of course, the Israeli Zionists rightly believe the dominionist Christian Zionists are bonkers, but being opportunists can’t help themselves). Of course, the Bush neocons, primarily Straussian and Zionist, don’t actually believe in God or anything else except taking over the world and making sure a couple million Israelis rule over 187,258,006 (as of 2005) Arabs and Middle Eastern Muslims.

It makes absolutely no sense for the Iraqi resistance to kidnap Kember and his associates. Kember worked directly with the Iraqi people and chances are slim to none he had any significant contact with the legitimate Iraqi resistance. It is absurd to think the Iraqi resistance—a movement drawing operational strength from its decentralized and secretive "cell" structure—would compromise itself by dealing with CPT or any other organization and thus possibly falling victim to spying. On the other hand, it is safe to assume if there were indeed spies in CPT—military intelligence spies working for the Pentagon or Iraqi intelligence (the two are interdependent and mutually inclusive).

Unfortunately, it does not look good for Kember and his hapless associates. Lately the Pentagon has suffered from devastating public relations—from revelations concerning the weapons of mass destruction attacks on Fallujah to emerging details about Bush’s airborne "frequent flier miles" rape and torture gulag to the commonly held belief the traitorous neocons lied the United States into a disastrous invasion and occupation—and in order to set things right "on the ground" in Iraq (in preparation for a new round of Vietnam-styled "rolling thunder" bombing campaigns and black op terror and assassination programs), do-gooders such as Kember and the CPT have to be run out of Iraq.

Kurt Nimmo

Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

Oh dear! Mr. Nimmo

30.11.2005 21:41

You've forgotten your meds again. You're going off on another rant about Likudite Zionism (??? ain't no such thing) and neocons and...and...blah blah blah.

Of course it makes no sense for the Iraqi "insurgents" to kidnap these Christian "peace activists". It made no sense for them to kidnap and murder Margaret Hassan either, but they did son. But since when did sense play any role in the insurgents' activities? And just because the Iraqi terrorists are dumb idiots who harm their own cause does not mean that the Americans did it to their own citizens. This "unheard of new group" is just another cover name for al-Qaeda or any of the other terrorist groups at large in Iraq. The new names are for the consumption of ignorant gullible fools like you.

ex Brit


Qui Bono?

01.12.2005 06:47

The FBI has stated several times over the past four years that such "previously unheard of groups" are usually Fronts for Intelligence Agencies. You cannot state anything for certain, and the people you defend are known liars and war criminals.

Question Must Be Asked


Ah but did the FBI say 'new groups' are the work of the US Govt?

01.12.2005 10:49

The likelihood is Kember has been abducted by criminals for profit as kidnapping is very lucrative in Iraq. As for this 'qui bono' debate it's rather silly. I doubt very much the FBI have said that new terrorist groupings are the work of the US govt! They may however have said they are the work of govts such as Iran. Can you provide a link to such a claim? I've had a similiar debate with you before, when you reckoned Ansar Al Sunnah was the CIA in spite of the fact they have killed US troops!

Arthur


Stretching the bounds of credulity as usual

01.12.2005 17:15

Are we supposed to believe that our governments, who torture people in secret prisons, hire merceneraries who play "Grand Theft Auto" for real in Baghdad, massacre innocent civilians with aerial bombardments, etc. etc. etc., wouldn't "stoop this low"?

Every time someone tells someone to "take their meds" for drawing a few tentative and wholly justified conclusions that differ from the propaganda line, it reminds of how Stalin era KGB informers would denounce dissidents as lunatics before they could be sent to the gulags.

Just the kind of things the govt would hire a private PR firm to do...

cynic


Weak

01.12.2005 19:56

"as kidnapping is very lucrative in Iraq."

Really? Could you cite some examples? It's my understanding that when known members of the Iraqi Resistance have been involved in kidnappings, they have received no compensation, and their prisoners are released, unharmed, report good treatment, and a connection to the Resistance fighters and their anger.

"As for this 'qui bono' debate it's rather silly."

Only because you know that answering the question damns your position.

"I doubt very much the FBI have said that new terrorist groupings are the work of the US govt!"

They did not specify, but analysts have stated that they've made these statements based upon the past work of groups like the CIA and Mossad. And I didn't specify either. Could be CIA, could be Mossad, could be both. After the whole SAS fiasco in Basra, it could very well be MI-6.

Great comment, "Cynic". There are a few too many of these people clogging up the IMC.

Aggressor Is The Evil


Is kidnapping in Iraq done by CIA?

02.12.2005 10:29

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4479038.stm. This article puts some perspective on kidnapping, usally it's done by a criminal gang for profit. Negiotations for a ransom ensue, it is in fact an age old tribal practice in the region. Unfortunately some of the victims are then sold to terror groups such as Zarqawi's thugs, eg. Berg, Bigley etc. Or murdered when it seems no ransom is paid, eg Hassan. You are right to point out that in quite a few cases the victim is released unharmed, after a ransom or concesions to the group have been made. Now you may disagree and still believe that Western agencies are responsible, however I look forward to you showing the link where the FBI said so! I won't hold my breath, too busy waiting for the cheque from MI5, who pay me for pointing out the ludricrous inconsistencies in your arguments, Not!

Arthur


That proves it?

02.12.2005 18:16

Still waiting for your FBI post! The tradegy of kidnapping and other matters highlighted in the last post by Tom Fox does not prove he was kidnapped by the CIA! Or is that something I missed?

Arthur


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Kenneth Bigley

02.12.2005 19:56

Bigley was just another dickhead involved in the pillaging of Iraqs wealth. It was just as legal to kill him as it is the coalition troops and its always a good thing to see the people for whom this war happened, dead. So good ridance to that fucker and I hope many more follow. More good news saw 10 marines killed by 1 roadside bomb y'day in Fallujah. Keep them comming.

IRAQ TO THE IRAQIS

Hell awaits


Yawn

02.12.2005 21:00

"This article puts some perspective on kidnapping"

No, it repeats the alternate speculation of people who support the war.

"Negiotations for a ransom ensue"

But where are actual examples that anyone has profited, other than the people who wish to keep our rational minds numbed by fear, the ones who LIED to us in order to start this in the first place, the people who have plundered the country, slaughtered civilians, targeted civilians and the media, and tortured innocent people?

"such as Zarqawi's thugs"

Who? There is no evidence that this one-legged bogeyman is even in the country, and his capture in Afghanistan in 2002 was touted as a "success in the 'War on Terror'".

"You are right to point out that in quite a few cases the victim is released unharmed"

Most cases, and all cases where groups within the Iraqi Resistance were proven to be the culprit. And they asked for nothing but for the Foreign Aggressor to leave their sovereign borders.

A Liar Lies, Even When He Speaks The Truth


Whats up with Indy removing comments

03.12.2005 09:20

Fascism alive and well here aswell???

???!


Hidden Comments

03.12.2005 10:06

Comments which breach the editorial guidelines may be hidden - they can be accessed through the "view all posts" page which is linked to from the Editorial Guidelines.

IMCista


If I'm lying...

03.12.2005 18:07

Then whoever said that 'the FBI have stated' etc is also lying. Show me a link where the FBI have said that terrorism in Iraq is the work of the CIA! Show me the link to it and I'll admit I'm wrong, only there is no link, because the FBI never said it and it isn't true! I seriously doubt that the CIA sawed Nick Bergs head off in an internet broadcast whilst screaming 'Allah Ackbar'!!! I mean dodgy as their past has been, it's highly unlikely they did that. But before we go any further will the conspiracy theorist who claims to be supported by public statements from the FBI, please provide some proof or admit they are lying? If they can I will reasess my position.

Arthur


Interesting Twists

03.12.2005 19:29

I always find it interesting what the Trolls choose to address ...

"Show me a link where the FBI have said that terrorism in Iraq is the work of the CIA!"

If you read my original comment, you'll see that I never said this. The FBI has stated several times over the past few years that most often, "previously unknown groups" are Fronts for Intelligence Agencies. If you're truly interested, you can do some research on the subject. One analyst said that they know this because of what intelligence agencies - including the CIA - have done in the past. There is precedence at work here.

"I seriously doubt that the CIA sawed Nick Bergs head off in an internet broadcast"

But you can't say, because the situation hasn't been adequately examined. I'm intrigued by the reports of his arrest by Iraqi Security Forces, the fact that he had just come from Israel, yet was captured in posession of antisemitic literature and a Koran. He was taken from the Iraqi Forces by American soldiers, so how did he end up dead? Why had Zaccharias Massoui used his laptop, including his password, to send e-mails two years previous?



Spooks R You


Ok so the FBI insinuated...

03.12.2005 21:34

The fact remains that the FBI never said that. However were they (the FBI) refering or insinuating that the CIA were involved? I doubt it as it would be one branch of govt blaming another! Look at my comment earlier, there is a possibility they meant another govt like Iran. I simply can't respond to your crazed suppositions, can you back the CIA one up with evidence? Or about Berg, can you provide some evidence it was CIA, instead of simply saying so? What you are stating are suspicions on your behalf, they are not credible informed opinion! I am willing to believe you however if you show evidence or informed opinion, please do! To clarify:

1. FBI believes CIA are reponsible for terrorism in Iraq-evidence please?
2.CIA murdered Nick Berg-evidence please?
You believe that sure, just convince me with some evidence or informed opinion!

Arthur


Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments