Bush and Blair are mere puppets of the International Bankers headquartered in the square-mile City of London, and their satraps in Wall Street, Basle and Tel Aviv.

On 9/11: No airliner hit the North Tower. No airliner hit the South Tower. No airliner hit the Pentagon. There were no airliners involved in the 9/11 hits. Try missiles. And a media (mostly TV and video) deception. See www.911hoax.com.

The THREE WTC Towers were brought down by controlled demolitions: The Twin Towers EXPLODED; WTC7 IMPLODED. The Twin Towers were immensely strong and needed a tremendously energetic agent - high explosives from top to bottom and in the basements near the bedrock - to bring them down. This has been proven beyond a shadow of doubt - see "Waking Up From Our Nightmare" by Don Paul and Jim Hoffman, as one proof among many.

Whatever happened to the passengers (did all of them actually exist?) and crews of the (alleged) pseudo-hijacked flights AA11 & 77 and UA93 & 175 - how, where and when they were killed - is anybody's guess. My guess: they were blown to bits over Pennsylvania at 10:05AM on 9/11/2001.

without wanting to miss the point, if you don't care about their bedroom habits, why dedicate 200 words to them? and why clog up this site with mere anti-Bush and anti-Blair sentiments? do you think that the people on here don't already feel/know what you just said?

Thank you "noballs chomsky" for a text-book example of what psy-ops call "poisoning the well".

For instance, the catholic church of old want to discredit the "round earth" movement. They can go around rubishing Galileo et al, but have the problem that all the facts are on his side. So, they PAY for agents to support the round-earth movement with their own idiotic and foolish versions. For instance, one agent says the earth is round because actually it is the eyeball of a giant moth endlessly flying around the flame of the sun. Then, when the catholic church "debates" the theory, their "flat earth" man rips apart the "looney" moth guy before the biggest public audience possible.

Of course, medieval catholics were not that clever. Today, PR, advertising, psy-ops etc benefit from years of research into human perception psychology.

The False Flag of 911 leaked like a sieve, with things going wrong, details getting out, and aspects of the operation (the total collapse of the buildings, and the coincidence of the strike position on the pentagon) being impossible to give any reasonable explanation for. The unexplainable elements represented the high risk element of the operation, and were ALWAYS going to receive extreme scrutiny afterwards.

Thus we have our New Reich troll telling us that the earth is round because it is the eyeball of a moth, er... I mean that 911 was a Blair operation because there were no planes.

Most of the sites that seemingly explore the events of 911 actually represent "poisoning the well" operations. They are easily identified, since they show a total lack of interest in the hard facts, and model themselves after the sites that deny the moon landings.

Does (THE TRUTH) + (A LOONEY) = (NO TRUTH). Logic does not work that way. Actually, I think we all KNOW this. The trick is not in the logic so much, but in the exposure and repetition. The false loonies that work on behalf of Blair exist to be quoted.

A better example of how things work happened on the dreadful "newsnight" this evening. The US government admitted that which they and the BBC had previously denied, namely that "white phosphorus" HAD been used as a weapon in Fallujah. Of course, the BBC also had its MI6 guy that masqueraded as a reporter during the genocide of Fallujah state "hand on heart" that he never saw a bad thing happen there, and that all the doctors in Fallujah (obviously the mysterious doctors that worked in hospitals OTHER than the ones which were bombed flat, or taken over by the US) told him face to face that no civilians had ever been killed there.

Also, the lead presenter (whatever the scumbag is called) informed us that "white phosphorus" could never be an illegal weapon, because it had some legal uses. Boy, can you tell that the BBC KNOWS that the audience that relies on their news are total morons.

Anyway, you should all recognise that famous line of argument that goes "because we were total wrong in everything we said, we are proved to be totally correct". Yes, I know it makes zero sense, but that is the line of reasoning you will get from every New Reich troll when their master changes the story, as happened with the underground shooting, or here with the chemical weapon strikes on Fallujah.

I would also like to point out that those of us who DO NOT NEED TO WAIT FOR NEWS TO BE GIVEN TO US BY WHITE PEOPLE already were aware of the chemical warfare atrocities carried out by Blair in Fallujah. How? By the reports from the "dark-skinned" humans that suffered or observed the events first hand.

Even today there are daily, first-hand accounts of the horrors in Iraq. They are given mostly by Iraqis brave enough to ignore the death penalty that independent reporting carries in that country. If you care, READ THEM. That way, you will know for instance of the torture factories, and the Badr Brigades that run them on Blair's behalf at an appropriate time, and not when an accidental and unexpected event forces them onto the front pages. You will even discover why Iran appears so foolishly brave (the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq was only possible because of the assistance given by Iran- the Badr Brigades are Iranian death squads comparable to the SS).

The world is a much more complicated place than most of you could ever imagine. If you think you know something about the world, you are more than likely wrong if that understanding is derived from the mass media. The fact that most people do not understand that Iran is the single most important ally of Blair and the US in both Afghanistan and Iraq scares me rigid. If you cannot perceive how the game is being played now, you have no chance of understanding how Blair plans to act in the near future.

The War against Iran will happen not because Iran knows that the US intends to attack, but because Iran KNOWS that the US has no intention of attacking its useful and mostly hidden ally. Iran's horrifying crimes in both Afghanistan and Iraq will actually become a significant part of Blair's "moral" pretext for striking them. Sunni anger is being carefully taken to boiling point in much of the Middle East so that Blair can direct it at the Shia muslims in the next stage of his war plans. This tactic is so old that it was in use BEFORE recorded human history.

Of course, the fact that the whole of Iraq is a police state, and that the only way an Iraq national can earn a decent living is by joining the army, is a little bit of a clue. Today, you can read black propaganda in the Mass Media telling you to CHEER this state of affairs, because it means "our boys" can come home sooner. Dear god, do I REALLY live in this world? Iraq was a problem because of its military ambitions, but Iraq ceases to be a problem when Iraq finally becomes one giant military state??? Is that REALLY the logic I have heard the BBC feed to the dribblers that make up its audience. AM I IN HELL???

Yes.

Play any CNN, CBS or NBC produced DVD or video of the South Tower impact and when the alleged 767 comes into view hit the pause on your remote and then single step until the "plane" is completely absorbed - enfolded - into the tower. You will - or certainly should - be absolutely positive that the video is a fake. See the fake 767 MELT - there is no other word for it - like a hot wire through butter into the building. You will see no vibration or crunching of the fragile aluminium airframe; no crater-like indentation formed into the side of the tower; no breaking or shearing off of the wings; and hear very little sound on impact, etc...etc.

Then, to see how the exterior of the tower was constructed, go here:  http://www.serendipity.li/wot/wtc_ch2.htm .

If this doesn't convince you of its fakery, you are truly brain-dead and It is YOU who is the LOONEY.

Yep...cartoon airliners inserted by the techno-spooks of the mainstream U.S. TV networks. It is sooooo obvious. The artifact-airliners could well have been concealing the missiles.

All the "amateur" (my ass) videos have also been thoroughly and brilliantly debunked by others. When the "Naudet brothers" video is analysed professionally
it is also glaringly obvious that it has been doctored.

When you come to think about it, the "no-planes-hit" theory is the ONLY rational, completely logical explanation there is.

No planes? Perhaps there were no tower....in fact, I've never seen America - how do I know it exists at all? Maybe the secret government has faked it all.....zzzzzzzzzzz

The second last post has this link to a great site which purportedly explains why there wasn't a crash. This is the kind of thing it says (and in fact is highlighted in bold)

"Note, that this description of the core is meant to mislead the reader by directing attention away from the cores main purpose, which was to support most, if not all, of the gravity load (weight) of the building and to reduce it to just an entrance and exit. The core provided the strength needed to support the weight of the structure, while the outer wall provided the necessary rigidity to resist lateral loading due to the wind."

This is voodoo structural mechanics. What it essentially says is that the floors (and loadings upon them) were cantilevered from the modest central core. Its possible, but not with the kind of lightweight structure used on the twin trade towers. Ask any competent structural engineer.

It's peppered with such errors, and we're meant to take it seriously!

This guy "Architect" is a fool or a knave - it must be the latter. Nobody could be that stupid and not get paid for it. What bilge he spouts!

"What it essentially says is that the floors (and loadings upon them) were cantilevered from the modest central core. Its possible, but not with the kind of lightweight structure used on the twin trade towers. Ask any competent structural engineer".

It doesn't say that at all, you plonker. The floors were supported by the truly massive central steel core box columns and the perimeter steel columns. If the floors fell away then no way would they drag down the central steel core. Lightweight structure! HAHAHA. 90,000 tons of high-grade steel and this asshole calls them lightweight. And no way are you a competent structural engineer, you're not even a competent knave. You are an idiot, and paid for being one. What a dork!