Why do you happily quote Blair's own New Reich language. You should have said "anti-terrorism" (in quotes to show disagreement with the meaning of the words). Without quotes, you are accepting the meaning, and are thus actually supporting Blair's intent.

Better would have been to have said "Lobby against the "fundamental attack against Human Rights" bill,"

In Blair's Mass Media, language is always used at max strength. In the "so-called" independent media, language tends to be used at full weakness, or worse, the "control phrases" of the government psy-ops programs are freely used.

THE LANGUAGE OF YOUR ENEMY IS ACTUALLY THEIR STRONGEST WEAPON AND WORKS AGAINST YOU, WHETHER IN THEIR HANDS OR YOURS.

Let me be frank in my opinion. Anyone who happily wields the weapon of Blair's language is on Blair's side as far as I am concerned. THEY ***NEVER*** MAKE THIS MISTAKE WITH ***YOUR*** LANGUAGE. When they talk about you, they NEVER use your chosen terms.

Want a good example? The BBC has been forced to give some coverage to the Italian documentary describing Blair's Crimes Against Humanity in Fallujah. The article WAS entitled-
US 'used chemical arms' in Iraq
but was quickly changed to-
US 'uses incendiary arms' in Iraq

The point about this simple lesson is that once it is taught, it is impossible to forget. So, I have to believe that the people who quote the "power" language of Blair (without comment) are either VERY stupid, or are ACTUALLY on his side.

To re-iterate. There is ***NO*** anti-terrorism bill going through the House of Commons. However, there is another stage of Blair's Absolute Dictator powers being hammered into place in a show event that approximates democracy in the same way that Hitler's show trials approximated justice.

Blair HAS ALREADY WON, getting ALL the powers he thought possible at this stage (clue- that is somewhat less than those being publicly requested), and probably a little bit more. The full range of measures in the published "bill" (and a lot more besides) will be easily gained by Blair in the near future, probably in the aftermath of another FALSE FLAG.

All you should be concerned about is that each and every day, BLAIR BECOMES MORE POWERFUL. What is really pathetic is that when this charade has played out, and Blair has everything he REALLY intended to get, Blair's disguised NEW REICH GOONS will be here crowing about Blair's "failure", and encouraging you all to think that Blair has been fatally wounded!!!

THINK ABOUT THAT. BLAIR WILL HAVE GAINED POWERS CONSIDERED ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE ONLY A FEW YEARS AGO, AND YOU WILL BE TOLD BY THE BIGGEST PSY-OPS CAMPAIGN IMAGINABLE THAT THIS REPRESENTS THE END OF BLAIR. ARE YOU THAT STUPID???

Ruth First was born on 4 May 1925 in Johannesburg, Between 1946-1952 she was the Johannesburg editor of the weekly newspaper The Guardian, the mouthpiece of the SACP. When this publication was banned in 1952, it was restarted under the name Clarion, a pattern which continued throughout the next decade, the titles used being People's World, Advance, New Age and Spark. Between 1954-1963 she was also the editor of Fighting Talk, a Johannesburg based monthly.

In 1950, she was named under the Suppression of Communism Act and her movements restricted. In 1953 she was banned from membership of all political organisations, although in 1955 she helped draw up the Freedom Charter, a fundamental document of the African National Congress, and was later a member of Umkhonto we Sizwe, the ANC's military wing. In December 1956, she was among the 156 people charged in the so-called Treason Trial, although her indictment was dismissed in April 1959.

In August 1963 she was arrested and detained under the 90-Day Law for a total period of 117 days.

Ruth First was killed on 17 Aug 1982, when she opened a parcel bomb addressed to her at the above university

Quote: "Lobby against anti-terrorism bill".

Why the fuck do you want to defeat anti-terrorism legislation? So the terrorists can blow us all to kingdom come? The terrorist lunatics of Al Qaeda must love you people! Yeah lets have no anti-terrorist laws then the terrorists can cause mass carnage on a scale never imagined! Morons!