Skip to content or view screen version

Flawed Crossrail Scheme: Theft of Taxpayers money

notocrossrail | 06.11.2005 11:41 | Anti-racism | Social Struggles | London

The Crossrail scheme will seek to make two-thirds of London pay for a line that will support a third of London’s richest community most of whom are commuters. Further taxpayers liabilites are likely given that the previous estimates, produced by the independent analyst turned Crossrail chairman Adrian Montague, have risen by 7 billion pounds. It has already cost taxpayers over £300 million pounds. We report why Adrian Montague is running privatisation schemes to rip off taxpayers making him little more than a tax thief.

Crossrail do not have the relevant funds for the £17bn scheme + interest for 30 years, for which taxpayers are expected to foot the bill. Crossrail chairman Adrian Montague produced an ostensibly independent feasibility report on the scheme before becoming chairman in July 2004. Montague report states the Crossrail scheme ‘appears to deliver value for money’. But goes on to state there is ‘significant uncertainty’ and ‘cannot be satisfied that Crossrail’s Business Case fully meets the tests in the Terms of Reference’. There is concern whether taxpayers will ever receive value for money from Crossrail and their future liabilities.

Montague has a history of involvement in PFI/PPP schemes. Many of which have relied on huge amounts of taxpayers’ money. In 2000, he was made Sir Adrian Montague “for services to the private finance initiative” but little was said about his services to taxpayers. Under “New” Labour, the ex-City lawyer Montague became the £160,000 a year head of Gordon Brown’s Treasury Taskforce on PFI. Montague extolled the virtues of PPP at an annual conference for Public-Private-Partnerships in 1999. He proclaimed: “It is not enough for public authorities to decide what sort of deals they want, they must also be aware of what sort of deals the private sector is willing to do”. According to Red Pepper, Montague helped John Major draw up the privatisaton of British Rail. In 2000, John Prescott made him a member of the Strategic Rail Authority (SRA), which was designed to help fix the privatisation of British Rail.

During a House of Commons debate on the Strategic Rail Authority in May 2004, Joan Walley, MP asks “Why is the SRA not accountable for the way in which it runs its services? Paul Marsden MP asks: “Why has he not been able to find a way to stop the apparent abuse of taxpayers’ money? ” At a later date, the National Audit Office stated: “the taxpayer could be exposed to further financial risk of £360 million”. Montague is also chair of British Energy. Montague received a bonus of £100,000 for restructuring funded by the taxpayers. The £5bn restructuring plan leaves the taxpayers open to take on further liabilities to the tune of £1.7bn with a further £3.9bn for the decommissioning of nuclear power stations. The National Audit Office blamed the Government for leaving taxpayers holding the liabilities for decommissioning its nuclear power stations. The total cost of cleaning up over 50 years of nuclear waste from UK power stations and military projects will rise to over £56bn according to Sir Anthony Cleave, who is chair of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. Mr Montague is currently promoting the use of nuclear energy instead of other viable alternatives.

Crossrail has failed to make the case for why two-thirds of London should pay for a line that will support a third of London’s richest community most of whom are commuters. The City and Canary Wharf, who are the major beneficiaries, previously offer to contribute towards Crossrail. However, support has been lukewarm since the Crossrail Bill has been presented to Parliament and the Government has assumed responsibility for the publicly funded scheme. The last reported offers from the City and Canary Wharf included a surcharge of 9million for 30 years with options to reduce the duration if fare revenue exceeds expectations. The Government claims it will not contribute more than £2billion. But a study produced by the Department for Transport proposes to use council tax rises. This will leave Londoners paying £8billion over 30 years. Crossrail has failed to prove the viability of what is fast becoming an exclusive scheme beneficial to City personnel, which means it, will be producing an annual £350-400m deficit. Claims that the likely revenue will be £200million a year still leaves the public to pay for the interest payments on a shortfall of at least £4-5billion with little or no mention of operational costs.

Privatisation particularly transport projects have proved to be poor value for money for taxpayers and users alike. Londoners have endured 226 delays caused by privatised companies Metronet and Tube Lines. Both were fined only £15.6million despite receiving subsidies worth more than a billion from taxpayers. Montague also led the finance team, which signed the Metronet London Underground Public Private Partnership. This is on top of £109 million paid to consultants and lawyers involved in the part-privatisation of the tube. The Government has already paid Crossrail start up subsidies of £300million to ensure it obtains necessary powers and meets a timetable for a bill deposit. Crossrail previously received £144 million from then Conservative Minister for Transport Paul Channon in 1989. Money was spent on an office block in Victoria and well-paid consultants.

The flaws of the Crossrail scheme are outlined in detail on the alternative rail scheme promoter Superlink, who state: “Crossrail's £6.5 billion funding gap can only be funded with additional taxes. Superlink £3.2 billion funding gap is only half as large, and could be funded without special new taxes. It only delivers 2.3% additional commuters into London. It delivers a 7% to 10% increase in commuting capacity. Crossrail only relieves congestion on a few routes, and actually worsens congestion and may affect performance on some National Rail routes. [Crossrail] has not even figured out how they will share tracks with existing freight and passenger services.”

notocrossrail
- e-mail: notocrossrail@google.co.uk

Comments

Hide the following 7 comments

tax payers

06.11.2005 12:21

I doubt anybody on here has paid any tax, so why worry, it's not your money they are wasting, anarchy and all that !

braz


CROSSRAIL ANOTHER TAX SCAM

06.11.2005 12:24

The City of London, which is a major beneficiary of the Crossrail scheme using public monies is also seeking to petition against the Crossrail Bill in order to seek further benefits. Railfuture reported on18 July 2005 that The Corporation of London, which acts as a local authority for the Square Mile known as the City of London has been involved in high-level discussions with Transport Minister Derek Twigg, who is now handling Crossrail. Railfuture reports the Corporation of London chairman Michael Synder saying: "Crossrail will help underpin thousands of jobs in the City and will be worth tens of billions of pounds in business and, in time, billions in taxes for the whole of the UK."

But the City’s petition shows Crossrail will primarily benefit the City and Canary Wharf. But Canary Wharf is seeking all the benefits and then expecting the public purse, ie taxpayers to compensate it for any disruption that it suffers even though most of the harm from Crossrail is located in the East End of London. The City’s petition asks to be compensated for blight and a return of any land used to build Crossrail. The City’s plans to benefit not only from Crossrail but also from the disruption that is caused gives no consideration to the fact that it is expecting taxpayers to pay for its scheme or that Crossrail is also seeking wide compulsory purchase powers in the East End of London. The City claims it is a major financial success but this does not extend to funding its own schemes. Meanwhile, the City gives no recognition to the labour rights of those in low paid work. The Mayor's London Plan’s has sought to designate legal powers to so-called “Opportunity Plan” areas, which will allow City interests to land grab using office development to displace communities across London. The Mayor has given no consideration to the collective impact on market traders, small businesses and creative industries or indeed how to safeguard their contribution over the years.


notocrossrail
mail e-mail: notocrossrail.google.co.uk


Not about taxpayers it is about harm

06.11.2005 12:29

I agree with notocrossrail and hope you will understand Baz that it is about the irreversible harm and displacement of communties as well as the tax frauds committed by characters like Adrian Montague.

These PFI deals are the reason why people eat crap in schools because they are locked into these stupid long term agreements with people who cannot even anticipate the idea of supplying real food or cleaning contracts in hospitals using awful chemicals that have resulted in people contracting stuff. It is a much wider issue but Adrian Montague is one of the scum bags that set these sort of schemes in motion so he must be exposed.

These people are destroying the earth and any value for human life.

thanks for listening or reading

earthstar
mail e-mail: notocrossrail@google.co.uk


stick your stereotypes up your arse

06.11.2005 12:48

Besides the fact that many anarchists do indeed work and pay tax - there are a myriad of other taxes which are paid by everyone regardless of employment status - ever wondered what that VAT on your receipts was braz, or were you too busy with ridiculous stereotypes to notice?

Tax payer


anarchy

06.11.2005 20:05

If you work and pay tax.. you aint a anarchist..Work it out nutmeg !

Braz


So, scrap Crossrail...

07.11.2005 17:34

So what would you do about the transport situation in London (which is pretty bad) instead then? Just have people clog up the roads with their cars due to the lack of investment in the rail network, and public transport in general?

Anwswers on a postcard...

the middle finger


Aha

07.11.2005 19:50

£300m? Remember "Scotching the Myth"? M and Pete will know what I mean.....

Boab