Skip to content or view screen version

The perfect example of spin

I see clearly now | 25.10.2005 12:32

The current news story today in the UK, and probably in the US, will be the US Senate's latest rehash of old alegations. The bigest story should be the 2,000 death of the poor US service men and women, dieing for the US senators, especially Mr Coleman.

The current news story today in the UK, and probably in the US, will be the US Senate's latest rehash of old alegations over George Galloway. The bigest story should be the 2,000th death of US service men and women, dieing for the US senators, especially Mr Coleman and his cronies.

This is the perfect example of international spin at its best. George's story is well publicised at the begining of every BBC radio and TV news article today:

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4374534.stm

Yet again it offers no new evidence, or is such evidence properly presented. It is pure spin.

Why then all this spin? Well, that is obvious, as we are reaching a milestone today, waiting for the 2000th US service man/women, and the 100th UK serviceman/women to die in Iraq. It will no doubtedly be today or tomorrow for the 2000th US death in Iraq, and god forbid the 100th UK death.

Iraq coalition casualities:
 http://icasualties.org/oif/

The spin has been in waiting for some time now. Maybe Tony will provide more spin and distraction today.

I see clearly now

Comments

Hide the following comment

General Norman H Schwarzkopf's autobiography written in 1992

25.10.2005 15:44

The first question is of course:

Why didn’t we go all the way to Baghdad and 'finish the job'

It should be clearly understood that the option of going all the way to Baghdad was never considered.

Despite all the so-called experts who, with 20-20 hindsight are now criticizing that decision, at the time the war ended there was not a single head of state or military leader who advocated continuing the war and seizing Baghdad.

The United Nations resolutions that provided the legal basis for our military ops in the gulf were clear, kick Iraq out of Kuwait.

We had authority to take whatever actions were necessary to accomplish that mission including attacks into Iraq, but we had no authority to invade Iraq to capture the entire country or its capitol.

In the gulf war we had 9 resolutions authorising our actions and the support of most of the world but only to liberate Kuwait not to capture Baghdad.

No Arab forces ever entered Iraq, only British us and French troops entered Iraq. I am convinced that had we decided to conquer Iraq the coalition would have fractured, also the only troops to participate would have been the us and British even the French would have withdrawn from the coalition.

Had the us and uk gone on alone to capture Baghdad we would have been considered occupying powers and under the Geneva and Hague conventions responsible for all the costs of maintaining and restoring the government education and all other services for the Iraqi people.

From the brief time we spent occupying Iraqi territory I am convinced we would be still there like the dinosaur in the tar pit and we not the UN would bear all the costs of occupation this is a burden I am sure the us taxpayer would not be happy to take on.

Do not forget that sad dam set himself up as the only Arab nation to take on not just Israel but the western powers had the us and UK attacked Iraq every citizen of the Arab world would be convinced that what sad dam said was true.

Instead they know the opposite is true that armed forces of both the west and the Arab nations fought side by side against Iraq’s aggression AND that once Kuwait was liberated the western nations withdrew their military forces and went home.

For once we were smart enough to win the war and the peace.

General Norman H Schwarzkopf's autobiography written in 1992

squig