Skip to content or view screen version

Amicus General Secretary Suspends Left Wingers

amicus member | 12.09.2005 11:14


Amicus General Secretary suspended leading left members of amicus staff and rules amendments allowing members to elect full time union officialsunion officials


from amicus.cc

Monday, 12 September 2005, 11:08:04am

Baylissgate Day 17

All Hell broke loose at and after the Executive meeting last Wednesday. General Secretary Simpson gave an extraordinary 30 minute rant about 'former friends out to get him' and about this website. He changed tack very quickly from a report on Baylissgate into an account of a plot to destabilise his leadership and the union as a whole. He attacked union employees, ex-employees, trustees, lay regional secretaries and the editor of this website, everyone except Bayliss, all in terms that might well prove to be defamatory in court.

The very next day he suspended three senior officials who are also leading members of the Left 'Gazette' group that got him and half the Executive elected. The editor of the Gazette publication Des Heemskerk and the union's Head of Purchasing Cathie Willis were escorted off the premises. The chair of the Gazette group, Jimmy Warne, has yet to learn of his suspension as he is on holiday in Greece. All three have still not been informed of why they were suspended but it is obvious that Simpson believes (erroneously as he will discover) that they leaked the Baylissgate documents to this website.

The meeting was confused but it seems the executive voted to approve this extract from the (secret) General Purposes and Finance Committee report:

"The General Secretary be authorised to take the necessary steps to: Investigate the source of the defamatory allegations and unauthorised disclosure and circulation of internal union documents Conduct a further investigation into, and consideration of, the legal and rule implications and options [i.e. suing www.amicus.cc and expelling David Beaumont].
A statement should be circulated within the union to make clear that amicus.cc’s false allegations were spurious and incorrect."

So there we have it, a secret investigation into Bayliss where the allegations are never disclosed and the report never published, compared to a kangaroo trial of three leading members of the Left in the union, where their crimes and guilt are read out to the executive before they are even informed, suspended, charged or investigated. So much for the union's conference slogan 'no power without accountability'. All we need now is for the three to 'fess up to their wicked crimes in a show trial and the farce will be complete.

At the same meeting Simpson got the Executive to postpone ALL rule amendments arising from the democratic Rules Conference of May 2005, until January 2006. This includes the election of full time officials and the removal of the ageist ban on older members holding lay office. By January the rule changes may be subsumed by the Mega Union Merger project anyway. Delegates to Rules Conference may wonder why they bothered. This unprecedented deferment of rule changes is almost certainly unlawful and many bed blocking members are considering submitting complaints to the Trade Union Certification Officer, as are the construction sector.

In all this heat some light did actually emerge from Simpson about Baylissgate. Apparently the two did not go to South Africa on a jolly paid for by Fauna and Flora International and we are happy to dispel that allegation. Also the 2005 investigation into Bayliss concerned matters other than original charges, i.e. some new ones to do with bills for 'Medical World'. Therefore it is possible that Deputy General Secretaries Dubbins and Sweeney did indeed find 'no evidence whatsoever' of the new charges if their investigation was limited in scope to just those new allegations. However it's difficult to comment without us (or the Executive) knowing exactly what the charges were or what the investigation concluded. We do know that Simpson admitted to the Executive that the 2005 complaint about Bayliss included the original 'Mr X' allegations. Therefore it is very difficult to exonerate Simpson for his incredible memo claiming there was no evidence whatsoever.
[reinstatethethree] Re-instate the suspended Amicus three
[amicus.cc] Previous story - Mr X Goes to Jail
[amicus.cc] Previous story - Baylissgate







amicus member

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

the same union that...

12.09.2005 11:49

Is this the same union who give money to the Labour party?

Fifteen trade
unions accounted for £4,909,250 or 62 pence in every pound received by the party centrally
Union £
Amicus (technical/professional) 430,040
ASLEF (train drivers) 12,163
BFAWU (bakers) 11,469
BECTU (broadcasting) 5,425
CWU (post/telecoms) 662,084
Community (steel/textiles/footwear) 219,284
Connect1 (telecom mangers) 31,000
GMB (general) 332,141
Musicians Union 45,739
NUM (miners) 6,036
T&G (general) 1,214,425
TSSA (transport staff) 60,167
UCATT (construction) 112,761
UNISON (public services) 927,974
USDAW (shops/distribution) 838,542
Total 4,909,250
1 Not affiliated to the Labour Party but an occasional donor.

 http://www.norwichgmb.com/images/Fact%20Service%20no21%202005.pdf

this union gave the labour party 430 thousand pounds, (the 2nd largest donation)
so this union supports the labour party
the Labour party supports the war (as well as many other human rights/eco rights breaches
so why does Indymedia give space to news about them??

==


also the union of current rolls royce strike against victimisation...

12.09.2005 16:46

...so its of vital interst to every reader of indymedia who supports workplace struggles. If Jerry Hicks is eventually sold out by his union leaders (and lets hope he wins)- then all this corruption and witchunting will provide usefull context to help understand the treacherous role of full time paid union bureacrats - and their links with nuLabour.

All power to the rank and file - solidarity is strength.

barrykade


same unions

12.09.2005 17:21

that £4,909,250 of donations from unions was only in the first quarter of 2005 and the run-up to the general election.

Shit that means that the fucking unions will give aproxamatly 19 million to the Labour party this year who supports the unions ? The rank and file.
Thats very working class solidarity to support the people who make your life and countless others worldwide lives miserable.

==


Spot which union is NOT on the list

13.09.2005 12:05

International Workers of the World is a non-hierarchical union that's in nobody's pocket.

 http://www.iww.org.uk/

Felix


an important battle that needs you!

15.09.2005 11:00

Okay, may be taking my life in my hands here.. ;-)

..but as a trade unionist, I think it's better to get involved and try to work through the union structures - which are ultimately democratic, at least more so than Parliament! - to try to stop the funding to Labour and shift it to something more useful, be it the long-dreamed-of left-wing alternative (Respect?) or simply grassroots campaigns.

Point is, millions of workers still belong to the mainstream unions - no disrespect to IWW but they've existed for more than a century and still only have a few hundred members. Better I think to get in where most workers actually are and try to shift the debate there.

It can happen - RMT no longer fund Labour after they voted to fund some SSP candidates and got chucked out. Both FBU and CWU have come close to breaking the link and debates have broken out in many other unions including Amicus, UNISON, GMB, T&G etc.

Just imagine the impact if one of the big unions stopped funding Labour. A bigger deal I suspect than a few activists quitting the union and going.. well, where, anyway?

Mr Spoon