(USA) What kind of organization does the antiwar movement need?
Ben Seattle | 09.09.2005 16:05 | Analysis | Social Struggles
An organization capable of overthrowing the system of imperialist rule cannot be built on a foundation of sand. Only principled, transparent and long-term collaboration between serious activists can:
(1) organize a decisive break from the
confinement of liberal-imperialist politics,
(2) mobilize the masses in their millions and
(3) chart the couse forward to a world without
imperialist war or capitalist exploitation
(1) organize a decisive break from the
confinement of liberal-imperialist politics,
(2) mobilize the masses in their millions and
(3) chart the couse forward to a world without
imperialist war or capitalist exploitation
Hi folks,
The current plan is that this essay will take up 3 pages of
a planned 8 page (ie: two 11 x 17 folded sheets) leaflet for
Sept 24 in Seattle, Washington.
Suggestions and criticism are welcome.
-- Ben
============================================================
What kind of organization does the antiwar movement need?
============================================================
An organization capable of overthrowing the system of imperialist
rule cannot be built on a foundation of sand. Only principled,
transparent and long-term collaboration between serious activists
can:
(1) organize a decisive break from the
confinement of liberal-imperialist politics,
(2) mobilize the masses in their millions and
(3) chart the couse forward to a world without
imperialist war or capitalist exploitation
------------------------------------------------------------
Why do we need organization?
------------------------------------------------------------
We need organization because without it we are powerless.
Individual activists, acting on their own, can do very little to
overcome their isolation and effectively challenge the domination
of the antiwar movement by the big coalitions which, in ways
large or small, have allied themselves to liberal-imperialist
political trends.
Only by combining our energies can serious, militant activists
develop a clear alternative to liberal lesser-evil politics and
bring this alternative to the attention of activists everywhere.
The antiwar movement can never become a powerful social force
until it breaks free from the straightjacket of the bourgeois
politics which are promoted by a reformist social strata (ie:
liberal-labor politicians, trade union bureaucrats, religious
misleaders, poverty pimps, "progressive" media personalities and
professional shapers of "public opinion") which is dependent on
the bourgeoisie and in orbit around the Democratic Party.
* Organization is the difference between a demoralized movement
attempting to elect the establishment savior who will betray us
next -- and a movement which decisively breaks from liberal
lesser-evil politics.
* Organization is the difference between an antiwar movement
which appeals to the conscience of liberal-imperialist
politicians -- and a movement which works to raise the
consciousness of the masses.
* Organization is the difference between a movement that revolves
around the hope of getting coverage on CNN -- and a movement
which builds its own network of leaflets, newspapers and websites
that connect to the masses.
* Organization is the difference between the hope of going back
to the mythical "democracy" that supposedly existed before 9-11
-- and the recognition that we live under a political and
economic system which is imperialist to its core -- and which
will launch one brutal war after another until it is overthrown.
* In summary, organization is the difference between defeat and
victory.
------------------------------------------------------------
We must recognize obstacles to organization
------------------------------------------------------------
But there are several obstacles to effective organization. We
must talk about these obstacles frankly and openly.
------------------------------------------------------------
Obstacle # 1 -- Not understanding who
to unite with and what to unite around
------------------------------------------------------------
The first obstacle to effective self-organization by activists --
is the lack of a clear understanding of what kind of activists
and, more importantly, what kind of agenda, we must organize
around.
If we are not clear on this -- we will end up with organization
which is either (a) focused on unrealistic and demoralizing
schemes to influence the powerful or (b) paralyzed by conflict
and infighting between those who want an alliance with the
reformist social strata and those who see the need to break with
this strata.
Effective organization in the antiwar movement must revolve
around an agenda of independence from (ie: breaking with) the
entire reformist social strata and the reformist ideology which
this strata promotes.
Breaking from the reformist ideology requires that we recognize
the nature of the society in which we live. We live in a society
ruled by the capitalist class (also known by its scientific name
-- the bourgeoisie).
As long as the bourgeoisie rule society they will launch one
imperialist war after another.
The only way to end this system of endless imperialist war -- is
to end the system of bourgeois rule.
Activists have many different views on how bourgeois rule can be
overcome (ie: whether it can be gradually reformed away or can
only be eliminated by means of a revolutionary mass movement of
millions). Activists also have many different views concerning
how society will organize itself in the period after bourgeois
rule is eliminated.
Activists who hold a wide range of views can play an important
part in building the kind of organization which we need so long
as they recognize (a) the necessity of breaking from the
influence of the reformist social strata and (b) that the primary
focus of the antiwar movement must be to tell the masses the
truth about the need to end the entire system of bourgeois rule.
Other than the two core views above -- all other ideological
divisions within the antiwar and/or anti-capitalist movement (ie:
between anarchists and "authoritarians", between trotskyists and
maoists, between this and that) are minor.
------------------------------------------------------------
Obstacle #2 -- overcoming sectarian and
undemocratic methods of organizing
------------------------------------------------------------
The antiwar movement needs a mass organization which includes
activists with a wide range of views concerning the path forward.
It will be inevitable, due to the crisis of theory and the
profound ignorance which saturates our society -- that many wrong
views (or views which are only partially correct) will exist in
and around this organization. It will, therefore, be necessary
to develop methods of sorting out, on the key questions, which
views conform to the needs of our time.
It is the practical experience of struggle which determines which
views are valid. But the experience of struggle is of no use if
it cannot be talked about, summarized, debated and understood.
Our movement is weak at this time because activists are being
kept unaware of the experience of struggle.
In a healthy revolutionary mass organization the experience of
struggle would be known through calm and scientific discussion
and debate.
Unfortunately the left (as it currently exists) is largely made
up of groups which are engaged in an intense dog-eat-dog
competition with one another over the warm, living bodies of
activists who are new on the scene and are looking for some
organized force to hook up with. These activists fuel, with
their money and labor, the growth (and the centralized staffs) of
the groups which are competing with one another for survival. In
these circumstances of cut-throat competition -- the need for
principled, transparent and long-term collaboration and for calm,
scientific discussion and debate -- is discarded by these groups
-- in favor of various forms of manipulation -- with each group
attempting to isolate itself from healthy criticism. In this
process, supporters of these groups, who are often intoxicated by
sectarianism -- cast critics as "black hats" and respond with
word-twisting, contempt, scorn and insults.
Most, if not all, of these groups -- in spite of the often
considerable amount of useful work which they do -- have a poorly
developed internal intellectual life -- and manifest many of the
characteristics of a cult (including the expulsion and isolation
of critics).
Multi-tendency organizations or coalitions which include
supporters of more than one of these groups are typically
characterized by (a) a form of unprincipled peace in which the
important issues are never discused and (b) unprincipled
manuevering and bloc voting (in which one group will pack a
meeting with its supporters -- who will all vote as a unified
bloc) in an effort to get their way and maximize their
recruitment of new blood.
------------------------------------------------------------
Informal organization must grow like a tree
------------------------------------------------------------
Because of the widespread manipulation and other unhealthy
features of even the best of existing organizations -- many of
the best activists are justifiably mistrustful of organization
and, as a result, are currently isolated from one another.
This situation needs to be overcome. But we cannot move forward
without taking into account the many existing unhealthy
organizational practices.
My conclusion is that the kind of organization which our movement
needs -- is organization which is somewhat informal and highly
democratic in nature. We must make it easy for the best
activists to get to know one another over the long term -- and to
work together and compare experience. We must make it difficult
for the control freaks to silence, intimidate or isolate critics.
Real organization can not emerge from any kind of "get rich
quick" scheme -- it must develop on the basis of healthy
principles and grow, over the long term, like a tree.
A real organization will develop around a core mission and
program. But for this core mission and program to serve the
needs of our movement -- it must be developed in an open way.
We need a form of organization where competing ideas and agendas
are put on the table and defended in a calm and open way -- and
there is open (ie: public) principled discussion and debate
concerning the fundamental path forward. We need to develop the
concept that we are accountable for our actions -- that we are
committed to answering questions and replying (calmly) to public
criticism from other serious activists. We can assist one
another by developing a tradition of publicly reviewing the
strengths and weaknesses of one another's leaflets. We can
deepen our understanding of key issues by discussing and
developing, in public forums, joint statements and resolutions.
We can make use of the emerging revolution in communications to
bring the principles that matter to increasing numbers of
activists so that we can reach a critical mass
And our developing community of activists can develop a focus on
our real tasks -- not by means of threats of isolation -- but
through passion and a recognition that we are here to fight.
------------------------------------------------------------
The Media Weapon community
------------------------------------------------------------
My own work to build organization along the lines I have
described above is focused on what I call the Media Weapon
community. At the present time, we are more of an email list
than a real community of the kind which is needed. But we may
develop over time.
All activists who oppose the war in Iraq are welcome to join our
community by subscribing to our pof-200 email list. We also
welcome those who we criticize in this leaflet. We need a
movement where thoughtful criticism flows in torrents like water
in a thunderstorm - and where all activists have the right to
reply and to defend their views.
------------------------------------------------------------
Does polarization weaken
the antiwar movement?
------------------------------------------------------------
Some say we intend to weaken the antiwar movement by splitting it
from its "natural ally" - the left wing of the Democratic Party.
We reply that the antiwar movement can never become powerful
until it turns its back on the imperialist Democratic Party and
all of its flunkies - and focuses one hundred percent of its
attention on raising the consciousness of the masses.
Some say that we intend to polarize the movement. Our reply is
that, in a class-divided imperialist society, polarization of the
movement is inevitable. We work so that this inevitable
polarization takes place in conditions of maximum consciousness
and clarity - so that the struggle between imperialist and
anti-imperialist politics within the antiwar movement - is no
longer hidden from activists - but is dragged into the light of
the sun.
------------------------------------------------------------
We welcome reformists
------------------------------------------------------------
We welcome to our community even reformist apologists for the
policy of alliance with the imperialist Democratic Party. Our
experience has been that the struggle on our email list against
the influence of these apologists for imperialist politics - has
been a powerful factor in waking up subscribers to the true
nature of reformism and a valuable source of experience in
principled polemical combat.
------------------------------------------------------------
We welcome sectarians
------------------------------------------------------------
We also welcome supporters of the various sectarian "socialist"
grouplets and anarchists of all kinds (including the most
immature). Our community is not afraid of people with a chip on
their shoulder or their head in a place that can't be reached by
sunlight.
Our email list has not had problems with flame wars or
word-twisting, time-wasting know-it-alls - because we limit
subscribers to one post per week (or two posts per week for
activists who march in antiwar actions) and require subscribers
to act toward one another with respect.
We know that all trends include activists with some level of
enthusiasm for doing the right thing and we want to accelerate
the process of separating what is healthy from what is not. We
want to be a refinery for the movement.
------------------------------------------------------------
We are here to fight
------------------------------------------------------------
The Media Weapon community is intended to be an ecosystem which
reflects and refines all the contradictions of the movement.
This means that we want our community to include representatives
of all political trends and currents of thought in the antiwar
movement. We understand that any time representatives of
opposing political trends are gathered together - struggle is
inevitable. That is fine with us. We are here to fight.
We understand that not all trends in the antiwar movement have
the stomach for an open, public principled fight for their views
and agenda. Our response to this - is to work for the day when
only those trends with the ability to openly fight for their
views can expect to gain mindshare in the movement.
------------------------------------------------------------
Like stars from galaxies
------------------------------------------------------------
Any member of our community has the right to propose any project
which they believe will be of value to the movement. And any
member has the right to participate (or not) in any project.
This follows from the fact that we are a community of autonomous
individuals.
However we also understand that the challenges of the antiwar and
anti-capitalist movements can only be successfully confronted by
activists who are united by serious discipline.
There will be a need for groups with serious discipline and these
groups may eventually emerge as smaller subsets of activists
within the context of the broader and looser community we are
creating. This broader and looser community may help to guide
the development and evolution of healthy principles, such as
political transparency, that are essential for the emergence of a
genuinely revolutionary mass movement.
If the development of disciplined organization is essential to
confront the demands of our time - then possibly the Media Weapon
community may play a helpful role in the emergence of such an
organization - by bringing into closer proximity an increasing
number of serious, militant activists.
Nature provides for us the example of galaxies which give birth
to stars when isolated atoms and molecules begin to concentrate
in regions of higher density. Prehaps, in an analogous way, the
Media Weapon community may eventually give birth to the mass
revolutionary party of the future.
- Ben Seattle
-
http://struggle.net/ben
Isolated from one another we are easily defeated.
Connected to one another no force on earth can stop us
http://MediaWeapon.com
------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
------------------------------------------------------------
I have used the word "we" in connection with describing
the Media Weapon community. It is therefore necessary
that I make clear that my views are not necessarily
representative of the views of anyone else in the Media Weapon
community. The views in this article are my own. I use the word
"we" in the conviction that, in the context of the aspirations of
activists in the movement as a whole, I am not alone.
The current plan is that this essay will take up 3 pages of
a planned 8 page (ie: two 11 x 17 folded sheets) leaflet for
Sept 24 in Seattle, Washington.
Suggestions and criticism are welcome.
-- Ben
============================================================
What kind of organization does the antiwar movement need?
============================================================
An organization capable of overthrowing the system of imperialist
rule cannot be built on a foundation of sand. Only principled,
transparent and long-term collaboration between serious activists
can:
(1) organize a decisive break from the
confinement of liberal-imperialist politics,
(2) mobilize the masses in their millions and
(3) chart the couse forward to a world without
imperialist war or capitalist exploitation
------------------------------------------------------------
Why do we need organization?
------------------------------------------------------------
We need organization because without it we are powerless.
Individual activists, acting on their own, can do very little to
overcome their isolation and effectively challenge the domination
of the antiwar movement by the big coalitions which, in ways
large or small, have allied themselves to liberal-imperialist
political trends.
Only by combining our energies can serious, militant activists
develop a clear alternative to liberal lesser-evil politics and
bring this alternative to the attention of activists everywhere.
The antiwar movement can never become a powerful social force
until it breaks free from the straightjacket of the bourgeois
politics which are promoted by a reformist social strata (ie:
liberal-labor politicians, trade union bureaucrats, religious
misleaders, poverty pimps, "progressive" media personalities and
professional shapers of "public opinion") which is dependent on
the bourgeoisie and in orbit around the Democratic Party.
* Organization is the difference between a demoralized movement
attempting to elect the establishment savior who will betray us
next -- and a movement which decisively breaks from liberal
lesser-evil politics.
* Organization is the difference between an antiwar movement
which appeals to the conscience of liberal-imperialist
politicians -- and a movement which works to raise the
consciousness of the masses.
* Organization is the difference between a movement that revolves
around the hope of getting coverage on CNN -- and a movement
which builds its own network of leaflets, newspapers and websites
that connect to the masses.
* Organization is the difference between the hope of going back
to the mythical "democracy" that supposedly existed before 9-11
-- and the recognition that we live under a political and
economic system which is imperialist to its core -- and which
will launch one brutal war after another until it is overthrown.
* In summary, organization is the difference between defeat and
victory.
------------------------------------------------------------
We must recognize obstacles to organization
------------------------------------------------------------
But there are several obstacles to effective organization. We
must talk about these obstacles frankly and openly.
------------------------------------------------------------
Obstacle # 1 -- Not understanding who
to unite with and what to unite around
------------------------------------------------------------
The first obstacle to effective self-organization by activists --
is the lack of a clear understanding of what kind of activists
and, more importantly, what kind of agenda, we must organize
around.
If we are not clear on this -- we will end up with organization
which is either (a) focused on unrealistic and demoralizing
schemes to influence the powerful or (b) paralyzed by conflict
and infighting between those who want an alliance with the
reformist social strata and those who see the need to break with
this strata.
Effective organization in the antiwar movement must revolve
around an agenda of independence from (ie: breaking with) the
entire reformist social strata and the reformist ideology which
this strata promotes.
Breaking from the reformist ideology requires that we recognize
the nature of the society in which we live. We live in a society
ruled by the capitalist class (also known by its scientific name
-- the bourgeoisie).
As long as the bourgeoisie rule society they will launch one
imperialist war after another.
The only way to end this system of endless imperialist war -- is
to end the system of bourgeois rule.
Activists have many different views on how bourgeois rule can be
overcome (ie: whether it can be gradually reformed away or can
only be eliminated by means of a revolutionary mass movement of
millions). Activists also have many different views concerning
how society will organize itself in the period after bourgeois
rule is eliminated.
Activists who hold a wide range of views can play an important
part in building the kind of organization which we need so long
as they recognize (a) the necessity of breaking from the
influence of the reformist social strata and (b) that the primary
focus of the antiwar movement must be to tell the masses the
truth about the need to end the entire system of bourgeois rule.
Other than the two core views above -- all other ideological
divisions within the antiwar and/or anti-capitalist movement (ie:
between anarchists and "authoritarians", between trotskyists and
maoists, between this and that) are minor.
------------------------------------------------------------
Obstacle #2 -- overcoming sectarian and
undemocratic methods of organizing
------------------------------------------------------------
The antiwar movement needs a mass organization which includes
activists with a wide range of views concerning the path forward.
It will be inevitable, due to the crisis of theory and the
profound ignorance which saturates our society -- that many wrong
views (or views which are only partially correct) will exist in
and around this organization. It will, therefore, be necessary
to develop methods of sorting out, on the key questions, which
views conform to the needs of our time.
It is the practical experience of struggle which determines which
views are valid. But the experience of struggle is of no use if
it cannot be talked about, summarized, debated and understood.
Our movement is weak at this time because activists are being
kept unaware of the experience of struggle.
In a healthy revolutionary mass organization the experience of
struggle would be known through calm and scientific discussion
and debate.
Unfortunately the left (as it currently exists) is largely made
up of groups which are engaged in an intense dog-eat-dog
competition with one another over the warm, living bodies of
activists who are new on the scene and are looking for some
organized force to hook up with. These activists fuel, with
their money and labor, the growth (and the centralized staffs) of
the groups which are competing with one another for survival. In
these circumstances of cut-throat competition -- the need for
principled, transparent and long-term collaboration and for calm,
scientific discussion and debate -- is discarded by these groups
-- in favor of various forms of manipulation -- with each group
attempting to isolate itself from healthy criticism. In this
process, supporters of these groups, who are often intoxicated by
sectarianism -- cast critics as "black hats" and respond with
word-twisting, contempt, scorn and insults.
Most, if not all, of these groups -- in spite of the often
considerable amount of useful work which they do -- have a poorly
developed internal intellectual life -- and manifest many of the
characteristics of a cult (including the expulsion and isolation
of critics).
Multi-tendency organizations or coalitions which include
supporters of more than one of these groups are typically
characterized by (a) a form of unprincipled peace in which the
important issues are never discused and (b) unprincipled
manuevering and bloc voting (in which one group will pack a
meeting with its supporters -- who will all vote as a unified
bloc) in an effort to get their way and maximize their
recruitment of new blood.
------------------------------------------------------------
Informal organization must grow like a tree
------------------------------------------------------------
Because of the widespread manipulation and other unhealthy
features of even the best of existing organizations -- many of
the best activists are justifiably mistrustful of organization
and, as a result, are currently isolated from one another.
This situation needs to be overcome. But we cannot move forward
without taking into account the many existing unhealthy
organizational practices.
My conclusion is that the kind of organization which our movement
needs -- is organization which is somewhat informal and highly
democratic in nature. We must make it easy for the best
activists to get to know one another over the long term -- and to
work together and compare experience. We must make it difficult
for the control freaks to silence, intimidate or isolate critics.
Real organization can not emerge from any kind of "get rich
quick" scheme -- it must develop on the basis of healthy
principles and grow, over the long term, like a tree.
A real organization will develop around a core mission and
program. But for this core mission and program to serve the
needs of our movement -- it must be developed in an open way.
We need a form of organization where competing ideas and agendas
are put on the table and defended in a calm and open way -- and
there is open (ie: public) principled discussion and debate
concerning the fundamental path forward. We need to develop the
concept that we are accountable for our actions -- that we are
committed to answering questions and replying (calmly) to public
criticism from other serious activists. We can assist one
another by developing a tradition of publicly reviewing the
strengths and weaknesses of one another's leaflets. We can
deepen our understanding of key issues by discussing and
developing, in public forums, joint statements and resolutions.
We can make use of the emerging revolution in communications to
bring the principles that matter to increasing numbers of
activists so that we can reach a critical mass
And our developing community of activists can develop a focus on
our real tasks -- not by means of threats of isolation -- but
through passion and a recognition that we are here to fight.
------------------------------------------------------------
The Media Weapon community
------------------------------------------------------------
My own work to build organization along the lines I have
described above is focused on what I call the Media Weapon
community. At the present time, we are more of an email list
than a real community of the kind which is needed. But we may
develop over time.
All activists who oppose the war in Iraq are welcome to join our
community by subscribing to our pof-200 email list. We also
welcome those who we criticize in this leaflet. We need a
movement where thoughtful criticism flows in torrents like water
in a thunderstorm - and where all activists have the right to
reply and to defend their views.
------------------------------------------------------------
Does polarization weaken
the antiwar movement?
------------------------------------------------------------
Some say we intend to weaken the antiwar movement by splitting it
from its "natural ally" - the left wing of the Democratic Party.
We reply that the antiwar movement can never become powerful
until it turns its back on the imperialist Democratic Party and
all of its flunkies - and focuses one hundred percent of its
attention on raising the consciousness of the masses.
Some say that we intend to polarize the movement. Our reply is
that, in a class-divided imperialist society, polarization of the
movement is inevitable. We work so that this inevitable
polarization takes place in conditions of maximum consciousness
and clarity - so that the struggle between imperialist and
anti-imperialist politics within the antiwar movement - is no
longer hidden from activists - but is dragged into the light of
the sun.
------------------------------------------------------------
We welcome reformists
------------------------------------------------------------
We welcome to our community even reformist apologists for the
policy of alliance with the imperialist Democratic Party. Our
experience has been that the struggle on our email list against
the influence of these apologists for imperialist politics - has
been a powerful factor in waking up subscribers to the true
nature of reformism and a valuable source of experience in
principled polemical combat.
------------------------------------------------------------
We welcome sectarians
------------------------------------------------------------
We also welcome supporters of the various sectarian "socialist"
grouplets and anarchists of all kinds (including the most
immature). Our community is not afraid of people with a chip on
their shoulder or their head in a place that can't be reached by
sunlight.
Our email list has not had problems with flame wars or
word-twisting, time-wasting know-it-alls - because we limit
subscribers to one post per week (or two posts per week for
activists who march in antiwar actions) and require subscribers
to act toward one another with respect.
We know that all trends include activists with some level of
enthusiasm for doing the right thing and we want to accelerate
the process of separating what is healthy from what is not. We
want to be a refinery for the movement.
------------------------------------------------------------
We are here to fight
------------------------------------------------------------
The Media Weapon community is intended to be an ecosystem which
reflects and refines all the contradictions of the movement.
This means that we want our community to include representatives
of all political trends and currents of thought in the antiwar
movement. We understand that any time representatives of
opposing political trends are gathered together - struggle is
inevitable. That is fine with us. We are here to fight.
We understand that not all trends in the antiwar movement have
the stomach for an open, public principled fight for their views
and agenda. Our response to this - is to work for the day when
only those trends with the ability to openly fight for their
views can expect to gain mindshare in the movement.
------------------------------------------------------------
Like stars from galaxies
------------------------------------------------------------
Any member of our community has the right to propose any project
which they believe will be of value to the movement. And any
member has the right to participate (or not) in any project.
This follows from the fact that we are a community of autonomous
individuals.
However we also understand that the challenges of the antiwar and
anti-capitalist movements can only be successfully confronted by
activists who are united by serious discipline.
There will be a need for groups with serious discipline and these
groups may eventually emerge as smaller subsets of activists
within the context of the broader and looser community we are
creating. This broader and looser community may help to guide
the development and evolution of healthy principles, such as
political transparency, that are essential for the emergence of a
genuinely revolutionary mass movement.
If the development of disciplined organization is essential to
confront the demands of our time - then possibly the Media Weapon
community may play a helpful role in the emergence of such an
organization - by bringing into closer proximity an increasing
number of serious, militant activists.
Nature provides for us the example of galaxies which give birth
to stars when isolated atoms and molecules begin to concentrate
in regions of higher density. Prehaps, in an analogous way, the
Media Weapon community may eventually give birth to the mass
revolutionary party of the future.
- Ben Seattle
-
http://struggle.net/ben Isolated from one another we are easily defeated.
Connected to one another no force on earth can stop us
http://MediaWeapon.com ------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
------------------------------------------------------------
I have used the word "we" in connection with describing
the Media Weapon community. It is therefore necessary
that I make clear that my views are not necessarily
representative of the views of anyone else in the Media Weapon
community. The views in this article are my own. I use the word
"we" in the conviction that, in the context of the aspirations of
activists in the movement as a whole, I am not alone.
Ben Seattle
Homepage:
http://MediaWeapon.com
Comments
Hide the following comment
Great Work!!
09.09.2005 22:29
by Jordan Thornton Friday, Aug. 19, 2005 at 2:55 PM
Cindy Sheehan's courageous actions in Texas have captured the imaginations of an American public desperate for an end to this madness. We must give them something they can get behind, while the Bush/PNAC Regime is vulnerable, and before the next big Distraction we all sense is imminent. Let's send an unmistakable message of unity and determination to the world, and end this now before things get any worse.
Since the demonstrations which reversed the electoral decision in the Ukraine, I've heard and seen many Ukrainians talking about large groups of foreigners who were pivotal to their planning. Many of these groups were the ones responsible for paying for the food, shelter, and orange banners used by the protestors. I didn't think much of this, or the accusations of funding from agencies such as the CIA, until I saw the same thing occuring in Lebanon.
Then, a reporter for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (
Sadly, the report lauded these tactics of Regime Change, but nonetheless, proved my point.
One thing I've noticed is the tightly-controlled Western media's willingness to ignore the unsubstantiated allegations made in Syria and Lebanon that the Central Intelligence Agency, or Israel's Mossad, or both, were responsible for actions like the assassination of Rafiq Hariri, and behind the recent Opposition Movements, while at the same time, parroting over and over the same unsubstantiated claims about Syria, emanating from the White House den of LIARS and thieves. Even media outlets which I consider better than the rest, like the CBC, are guilty of such irresponsibility. When pro-Syrian demonstrators turned out in the hundreds of thousands, proving the anti-Syrians to be the minority voice, the media downplayed these numbers.
Just feels a bit too staged for my taste ... What I find the most irresonsible about all of this is the fact that whoever is behind this, they are attempting (and succeeding) to divide the Lebanese People, and cause conflict both within the country, and towards Syria. This, of course, aids the Israelis and PNAC Americans, who both have an interest, and want to invade and occupy Syria (and perhaps Lebanon as well), as called for repeatedly by the agenda which has seen Bush/PNAC illegally invade two Arab nations already.
The CBC chose Janice Stein, a Zionist "Middle East Expert" to comment on the situation, and she said when she saw the demonstrations she "saw the colour orange". This was after the first anti-Syrian demo, when the colour scheme wasn't so pronounced. Since then, orange flags, placards, etc. have started "spontaneously" appearing in great numbers.
When I was in university, my Design professor brought in some Colour Researchers from the University of Edmonton, who lectured on the psychological, but also the PHYSICAL effects, colours have on the human body and mind. This red-orange colour is one of the "comfort colours", and you will no doubt remember seeing it in countless commercials (ING Direct, and the creepy, stereotypical European banker, anyone ... ?).
Since the CIA, or Mossad, or whoever is ultimately behind these carefully stage-managed displays, you know they understand what they're doing. I believe that we should be taking a cue from them, and striking while the iron is hot.
This orange colour scheme has been carefully crafted in order to transmit "armchair understanding" of these two manufactured crises.
Even though it was our Enemy putting it out there, for their own purposes, we should seize the opportunity to claim it for ourselves. After all, we have been granted an unprecedented look inside the CIA's "Handbook for Non-Violent Revolution", and you know damn well that they have studied all of the relevant psychological factors.
If you are to protest, from now on, DRESS IN ORANGE, and CARRY SIGNS OF ORANGE, rally at the feet of power, and the media, DEMANDING that the democratic Will of the People not be ignored. I guarantee this will send an instant message, not only to the Bush/PNAC/Bliar Regime, but to all Americans and to the world that sees it.
Keep your signs easy to read and understand, things such as "FIRE THE LIARS", "INVESTIGATE, IMPEACH, PROSECUTE" and at media centres, "LIARS", or "TRAITORS", or "COWARDS".
Groups should design some Talking Points, and designate members to speak with the reporters on-scene. In larger centres, you should inform the media of what's going to happen, and call the stations' News Director or Assignment Editor, and request to be interviewed. You could even take it further, and offer your services as an Activist Analyst for the day, just like they use ex-military personnel, and members of Right-Wing "Think-Tanks".
Let's test these LIARS and War Criminals, and their media puppets, and see just how much they truly respect "Freedom & Democracy", the words upon which they attempt to justify the attrocities upon which they've built their fortunes.
Regardless of what happens, the message will be sent. We have nothing to lose. If something comes of this, then great. Follow up and celebrate. If the rallies are ignored, or treated by the police as those in the past, then you've just PROVEN these men to be the Hypocrites we all know them to be.
I'd like to see as many people as can not simply Rally for a few hours, but for DAYS. Those who cannot make it there, plan and hold your own local rallies, and not only gather where your Government officials meet, but also where the media does its business.
Let's take this thing that was designed to dupe people into supporting what the Fascists in DC want, and turn it on its head.
Let's use it as a tool for bringing that Fascism to its knees, and demonstrate the good intentions that were to be assumed about the "Orange Revolutionaries".
Remember, that we are the Majority, and Truth is our greatest Ally.
The only way we can fail, is if we fail to ACT.
P E A C E . . . ?
"No matter how far you have traveled down the wrong road, turn back"
- Ancient Egyptian Proverb
There will be a Plant along to Cast Doubt on my ideas, and attack my person (Seems to be followong me around ...), but you'll recognize his Ad Hominem Tactics of Disinformation, and his transparent focus. Seems I've made some people nervous with this ... which is a great sign!!
25 Tactics of Disinformation:
vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2003/11/82358_comment.php#82516
Logical Fallacies: Of Propaganda & Disinformation:
www.meetwithcindy.com
Jordan