Report back from Jerry Hicks talk in Cambridge
manos | 13.08.2005 20:01 | DSEi 2005 | Anti-militarism | Social Struggles | Cambridge
Jerry Hicks, a sacked trade unionist working at the Bristol Rolls Royce plant, talked in Cambridge on the Thursday 11th August. The meeting was organized by the Marshall's Aerospace branch of the Amicus Union in Cambridge, but the audience was quite mixed with trade unionists sitting next to anti-war and social justice activists.
Jerry has been the steward of of the Amicus branch in the Bristol RR plant for many years. When two workers got sacked on dubious grounds he convened workplace meetings that end up in walkouts. The actions were successful and the workers were re-instated. A few weeks later he was himself called to a disciplinary meeting. There were three charges: that he organized and orchestrated unofficial action, he influenced the decision of the appeal panel (in the case of the two sacked workers), and that he stood on the way of normal working practices.
The employment tribunal that heard the case admitted that Jerry was sacked “probably on trade union grounds”, and advised that he should be re-instated. RR ignored this decision (and the law does not oblige them to implement it). As Jerry pointed out, all the charges relate to him basically being an active trade unionist, and to some extent are at the core of what a trade unionists do – organize industrial action when disputes cannot be resolved in other ways. The idea that an action is official or unofficial is the product of many years of anti-union laws that limit the ability of working people to effectively organize. Despite these laws being passed under the conservative government, they have survived two labor government terms – which makes them now “labour's anti-union laws”.
As a result of Jerry's dismissal, there has been a ballot and indefinite strike action will be taken, starting on August 22nd, until he is fully re-instated. A rallie has also been called in Bristol for the Friday 2nd September (coaches from Cambridge should be available).
The question of the opposition to the arms trade was raised by a question in the audience: how is it possible for anti-war and anti-arms trade activists to support workers in the industry that is feeding both (both RR and Marshall's are after all making their money by selling weapons). Jerry's response was quite clear: he recognized that is is working on the wrong side, yet people work for a living – they are forced to work, often in conditions and making things they do not agree with. He said “I would rather be making hospital equipment”, and stated his opposition to the war. Yet at the same time having organized unions working in these industries gives people more power – since they are in a privileged position to throw their wrenches in the gears of the war machine, and capitalism in general. Members of the audience also reminded us how the issue of “arm conversion”, or generally social utility of production, was in the agenda in the 70s – it is about time it comes back on it!
Petition:
http://www.amicustheunion.org/Default.aspx?page=2544
Meeting photos + call:
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/cambridge/2005/08/321048.html
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/cambridge/2005/08/320800.html
Previously in the news and related:
Anti-RR demo...
https://www4.indymedia.org.uk/en/2003/10/279392.html
Campaign logo
http://bristol.indymedia.org/newswire.php?story_id=24102
CAAT RR brief
http://www.caat.org.uk/information/publications/companies/rollsroyce2002.php
Update
http://bristol.indymedia.org/newswire.php?story_id=24108
Solidarity Demo
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/westcountry/2005/07/318968.html
Background
http://bristol.indymedia.org/newswire.php?story_id=24054
The employment tribunal that heard the case admitted that Jerry was sacked “probably on trade union grounds”, and advised that he should be re-instated. RR ignored this decision (and the law does not oblige them to implement it). As Jerry pointed out, all the charges relate to him basically being an active trade unionist, and to some extent are at the core of what a trade unionists do – organize industrial action when disputes cannot be resolved in other ways. The idea that an action is official or unofficial is the product of many years of anti-union laws that limit the ability of working people to effectively organize. Despite these laws being passed under the conservative government, they have survived two labor government terms – which makes them now “labour's anti-union laws”.
As a result of Jerry's dismissal, there has been a ballot and indefinite strike action will be taken, starting on August 22nd, until he is fully re-instated. A rallie has also been called in Bristol for the Friday 2nd September (coaches from Cambridge should be available).
The question of the opposition to the arms trade was raised by a question in the audience: how is it possible for anti-war and anti-arms trade activists to support workers in the industry that is feeding both (both RR and Marshall's are after all making their money by selling weapons). Jerry's response was quite clear: he recognized that is is working on the wrong side, yet people work for a living – they are forced to work, often in conditions and making things they do not agree with. He said “I would rather be making hospital equipment”, and stated his opposition to the war. Yet at the same time having organized unions working in these industries gives people more power – since they are in a privileged position to throw their wrenches in the gears of the war machine, and capitalism in general. Members of the audience also reminded us how the issue of “arm conversion”, or generally social utility of production, was in the agenda in the 70s – it is about time it comes back on it!
Petition:
http://www.amicustheunion.org/Default.aspx?page=2544 Meeting photos + call:
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/cambridge/2005/08/321048.html http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/cambridge/2005/08/320800.html Previously in the news and related:
Anti-RR demo...
https://www4.indymedia.org.uk/en/2003/10/279392.html Campaign logo
http://bristol.indymedia.org/newswire.php?story_id=24102 CAAT RR brief
http://www.caat.org.uk/information/publications/companies/rollsroyce2002.php Update
http://bristol.indymedia.org/newswire.php?story_id=24108 Solidarity Demo
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/westcountry/2005/07/318968.html Background
http://bristol.indymedia.org/newswire.php?story_id=24054
manos
Comments
Hide the following comment
The nature of the beast
21.08.2005 09:01
There is not exactly a huge unsatisfied demand for hospital equipment or televisions or toasters etc etc........if there was, then capital would have been invested to satisfy this demand? An organisation cannot survive on making products just on the basis that YOU deem them to be more socially acceptable!
GET REAL, there is no synergy between Trade Unionism and the Anti-War movement, the latter aims to take money and hence jobs out of the industry. If you want to understand why there is a demand for weapons, it is in the nature of the beast .........Man! And its not about to change overnight or even for hundreds of years.
Rare damsel