Skip to content or view screen version

Mass Act of Defiance and other protests against new law

supporter for right to protest near Parliament | 30.07.2005 11:36

Protests are happening in the coming week against the new restrictions on demonstrations around Parliament under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act

[A] MASS ACT OF DEFIANCE: For the Right to Protest, 12 noon, 7 August, Parliament Square

[B] Nonviolent direct action training - 31 July

[C] Other upcoming unauthorised protests in the new exclusion zone around Parliament

*******************************************
[A] MASS ACT OF DEFIANCE
For the Right to Protest

Assemble 12 noon, Sunday 7 August
Parliament Square

The new Serious Organised Crime and Police Act (April 2005) makes all unauthorised protests within 1km of Parliament illegal after 1 August. The first targets of the Act are likely to be Brian Haw's 4-year 24-7 peace vigil in Parliament Square and the weekly Anti-war Community Picket of the Global Women Strike (also in the Square), but the law will affect *all* activists and campaigners.

PLEASE JOIN US ON 7 AUGUST: Bring your banners, leaflets, placards and campaigns for peace, human rights, asylum rights, labour rights, animal rights, social justice,
international solidarity, the environment etc... to this action to defy the new anti-protest legislation and defend the right to demonstrate near Parliament.

PLEASE NOTE:
[1] There is a risk of arrest at this action, since it is an unauthorised protest against a law which makes such protests illegal. Please read the legal briefing below before deciding to attend. [2] This is a peaceful protest: participants should not harm or dehumanise any human being at this event.

Called by the Mass Act of Defiance Group. For more info. e-mail  massactofdefiance@fastmail.fm.
************************************

[B} TAKING PART IN THE PROTESTS? COME TO THE TRAINING WORKSHOP & LEGAL BRIEFING
A nonviolent direct action training workshop and legal briefing for those taking part in the protests will take place on Sunday 31st July:11.30am to 5pm, St Martins Community Centre, 43 Carol Street, London NW1(nearest tube Camden Town). Please note that there is NO parking near the centre.

The workshop will cover strategies for creating empowering and effective actions and so will be useful for anyone taking part on the protests around Parliament.

It will be particularly useful if you have never been arrested before or if you're intrigued but feel you lack the confidence or knowledge to take things further.

************************************
THE SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME AND POLICE ACT

Under section 132 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act it is an offence to organise or take part in a demonstration in a public place within the "designated area"
(up to 1 km around parliament) if authorisation has not been given by the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, to whom an application has to be made at least six days in advance, or if not "reasonably practicable", 24 hours in advance. The commissioner may impose conditions on the demonstration; , including where and when the protest may take place, how long it can last and how many people can attend, how much noise can be made and the number and size of banners or placards used. Additional conditions may be imposed during the demonstration by the senior police officer present. The new law also criminalises demonstrations by a single person - a section targeted at Brian Haw - and prohibits the use of loudspeakers.

Organisers of unauthorised demonstrations may be subject to imprisonment for up to 51 weeks, a fine (level 4: up to £2500), or both; participants may be subject to a fine (level 3 :up to £1000).

Liberty have described these measures as restrictive and disproportionate, and the restrictions placed on place, time duration and noise as neutering protest. They are incompatible with Article 11 of the Human Rights Act (right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association), which requires any restrictions on this right be legitimate, reasonable and proportionate. The act - both in the determination by the Police Commissioner and the imposition of conditions - may also be seen as arbitrary, limiting the rights of some and not others to protest.

******************************************
[B] OTHER UPCOMING UNAUTHORISED PROTESTS IN THE NEW EXCLUSION ZONE AROUND PARLIAMENT

1 AUGUST - Stop the War have called a demonstration at 2pm on Monday 1st August in Parliament Square against the new protest exclusion zone.www.stopwar.org.uk/Exclusio
nZone.htm

3 AUGUST - Anti-war Community Picket organised by the Global Women's Strike will take place as always from 5.30 to 7pm in Parliament Square.www.globalwomenstrike.ne
t. Join the picket and show solidarity.

supporter for right to protest near Parliament
- e-mail: massactofdefiance@fastmail.fm
- Homepage: http://www.parliamentprotest.org.uk

Comments

Hide the following 8 comments

?

30.07.2005 13:24

Does ruling on Brian's protest restrict the execption to him or his protest. In other words, could other people join his protest... rather a lot of people?

magoo


Reply to 'Magoo'

30.07.2005 19:01

>> Does ruling on Brian's protest restrict the execption to him or his protest. In other words, could other people join his protest... rather a lot of people?

Do you wanna actually spell this out properly so's we can all understand? Or are you just off yer fucking head mate?

The_X_Faction


I think....

30.07.2005 20:25

...that he means can new people turn up, effectively making it a new protest, but claim to be part of the earlier (exempt) one.

Boab


possibly

30.07.2005 21:12

If you read the Telegraph today (sometimes you have to unfortunately) on this story, it suggests that anyone who was in place before 1 August (i.e. whose protest did not 'start' on or after 1 August, but was 'continuing'....) may be exempt like Brian is.

Brian supporter


x faction idiot

30.07.2005 22:56

Well I think magoos suggestion seems eminently understandable and quite clever if it works. Cant understnd what is wrong with this x man above.

Zaskar
mail e-mail: markdwatson@blueyonder.co.uk
- Homepage: http://www.zaskarfilms.com


pardon me

30.07.2005 23:30

Sorry folks, I got the wrong end of the stick, please discuss and ignore my un-level headed outburst. Respects to all.

The_Renewed_X_Faction


"The Devil's in the detail."

31.07.2005 08:39

A transcript of the ruling would be helpful. I'm sure Brian's solicitor would be able to provide one. If I'm correct in my thinking the ruling is in the form of an injunction... it's whether the ruling applies to Brian personally or to his protest. Professional scrutiny would be interesting.

I get the impression the court was quite unimpressed by the government's intentions, so there may be a chance they left "overlooked" something "open to interpretation".

The other point that struck we was the basis for the injuction was that protest predated the legislation. I wonder what legally constitutes a paralell: i.e. how regular does a protest have to have been to cite Brian's ruling as permission to continue to protest.

A few mainstream journos & politicians seem quite taken by the case, so it may be worth getting them in on the act for maximum embarressment factor.

The next thing that occurs to me is: what can take place that doesn't qualify as a protest. I.e. does a group of 5 people walking through the square every five minutes with an occassional van with loudspeakers fall outside the legislation? And what if you chucked in a few dozen people who "happened to be passing"?

A more humorous suggestion would be Sparticus scenario where everyone gave their name and details as Brian's, heehee! Wouldn't make much difference to the plod as they bundled everyone in a van, but it would at least make funny copy.

This could prove to be very embarressing for Blair.

Just a thought!

magoo


hehehe

31.07.2005 15:52

no, i am brian.....

anarcho crab pate