Britain, Israel in anti-terror talks after London bombings
Various | 27.07.2005 22:39 | Terror War
This is a moot point, until the Bliar Government supplies the missing, key evidence to support its Conspiracy Theory, thus proving that the recent attacks were not False Flag Attacks, intended to frighten & distract citizens, and goad the UK into further Acts of Aggression.
Britain, Israel in anti-terror talks after London bombings
Agence France Presse
26 July 2005
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050726/wl_uk_afp/
britainattacksisrael
The British and Israeli foreign ministers held talks on how to deal with international terrorism in the wake of the London bombings which left 56 people dead earlier this month.
British police have been criticised for allegedly copying Israeli shoot-to-kill policies in the hunt for suspected suicide bombers after an innocent Brazilian man was killed by (alleged) anti-terrorism police here last week.
Visiting Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom refused to comment about the specific nature of the cooperation between Israeli and British security forces, saying only that both countries stood united in the "war on terror".
(Only in Israel, they are fighting against a movement legitimized by Zionism's decades-long war on the Palestinians, while London appears to be a False Flag Operation.)
"Our discussions today of course focused on the question of
terrorism and how well it can be combated," Shalom told a press conference alongside British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw.
"We are sharing our assessments as well as our experience with all the world, not especially the United Kingdom. Of course we will be very happy to help anybody who asks for this help," he said.
(Perhaps asking the Zionists is not the right course of action ... They haven't done all that well at this, and their response seems to be "kill more civilians than the 'terrorists', then expend your borders a little more".)
Both ministers stressed that international Islamic terrorism had to be met head-on and could not be justified by the US-led war in Iraq or Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories.
(But you cannot lump several different conflicts into an "international Islamic terrorism". Doing that just illustrates your dishonesty!)
"Don't believe for a moment that if we were to withdraw from Iraq or if we were never there that this terrorism would stop. It's really poor journalism for people to run around looking for excuses when those excuses just are not there," Straw said.
(But they are, you see. You LIED in order to violate International Law, and slaughter thousands upon thousands of innocent men, women, and children. That aside, this is a False Flag, intended to goad the UK into further Acts of Aggression.)
Their comments echoed British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who earlier Tuesday said Britain and the world should "not give an inch" to terrorists' demands or attempt to find excuses for their attacks.
(This comes just a short time after he said that "Saddam could launch an attack on Britain within 45 minutes, and deploy his vast arsenal of WMD at us ... so you should support our planned invasion" ...)
Shalom said the time had come for the European Union, of which Britain currently holds the rotating presidency, to add Palestinian militant group Hamas to its blacklist of terrorist organisations.
(Sure. Just as soon as Zionism ends its decades-long War in Palestine, adheres to UN Resolutions, and sets permanent, non-expanding borders.)
He repeated Israel's calls for international, and particularly EU, pressure to be brought to bear on Palestinian leader Mahmud Abbas to crack down on groups like Hamas during Israel's pullout from the Gaza Strip.
(A pullout which will begin on ... ? My, that's a lot of positive PR for something you haven't even done yet!)
Israel is on track to begin evacuating all 21 Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip and another four isolated communities in the northern West Bank from the mid-August.
(If a thief brought back PART of what he had stolen from you, after stealing his house initially from you, would you applaud him as a great person? What if he'd killed many of your friends and family members along the way?)
Shalom also lashed out at London Mayor Ken Livingstone for
suggesting that suicide bombings against Israeli civilians were somehow justified.
(What, specifically, did he say?)
"In Israel we were shocked to hear those statements that were made by the mayor of London, and I do not want to repeat what some Israelis have said about him and about maybe his mental condition," Shalom said.
(However, in saying as much, I just did, so there!)
"There is no way to understand what the mayor of London has said. To distinguish between the blood of innocent Israeli civilians and the blood of others is unacceptable."
(What, specifically, did he say? What were his exact words?)
______________________________________________________
Montreal Muslim News Network - http://www.montrealmuslimnews.net
Listen to Caravan, produced by Samaa Elibyari, every Wednesday from 2-3PM:
http://www.montrealmuslimnews.net/caravan.htm
see also:
Police Chiefs who went on training visit to Israel
Below is the list of Ontario Police Chiefs and other senior officials who went on the Canadian Jewish Congress/Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police sponsored trip to Israel March 1 to 8 to learn about Israeli "policing methods".
(It should be noted that the "Canadian Jewish Congress" is now a Zionist organization, after its popularly-elected Board was pushed out, and a Zionist "Emergency Cabinet" was installed, to deal with the growing "demonization (education about) Zionism and its Apartehid State in Palestine. This just happened to coincide with several prominent appointments to the Government of Canada of Zionists.)
http://bc.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/3102
Agence France Presse
26 July 2005
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050726/wl_uk_afp/
britainattacksisrael
The British and Israeli foreign ministers held talks on how to deal with international terrorism in the wake of the London bombings which left 56 people dead earlier this month.
British police have been criticised for allegedly copying Israeli shoot-to-kill policies in the hunt for suspected suicide bombers after an innocent Brazilian man was killed by (alleged) anti-terrorism police here last week.
Visiting Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom refused to comment about the specific nature of the cooperation between Israeli and British security forces, saying only that both countries stood united in the "war on terror".
(Only in Israel, they are fighting against a movement legitimized by Zionism's decades-long war on the Palestinians, while London appears to be a False Flag Operation.)
"Our discussions today of course focused on the question of
terrorism and how well it can be combated," Shalom told a press conference alongside British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw.
"We are sharing our assessments as well as our experience with all the world, not especially the United Kingdom. Of course we will be very happy to help anybody who asks for this help," he said.
(Perhaps asking the Zionists is not the right course of action ... They haven't done all that well at this, and their response seems to be "kill more civilians than the 'terrorists', then expend your borders a little more".)
Both ministers stressed that international Islamic terrorism had to be met head-on and could not be justified by the US-led war in Iraq or Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories.
(But you cannot lump several different conflicts into an "international Islamic terrorism". Doing that just illustrates your dishonesty!)
"Don't believe for a moment that if we were to withdraw from Iraq or if we were never there that this terrorism would stop. It's really poor journalism for people to run around looking for excuses when those excuses just are not there," Straw said.
(But they are, you see. You LIED in order to violate International Law, and slaughter thousands upon thousands of innocent men, women, and children. That aside, this is a False Flag, intended to goad the UK into further Acts of Aggression.)
Their comments echoed British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who earlier Tuesday said Britain and the world should "not give an inch" to terrorists' demands or attempt to find excuses for their attacks.
(This comes just a short time after he said that "Saddam could launch an attack on Britain within 45 minutes, and deploy his vast arsenal of WMD at us ... so you should support our planned invasion" ...)
Shalom said the time had come for the European Union, of which Britain currently holds the rotating presidency, to add Palestinian militant group Hamas to its blacklist of terrorist organisations.
(Sure. Just as soon as Zionism ends its decades-long War in Palestine, adheres to UN Resolutions, and sets permanent, non-expanding borders.)
He repeated Israel's calls for international, and particularly EU, pressure to be brought to bear on Palestinian leader Mahmud Abbas to crack down on groups like Hamas during Israel's pullout from the Gaza Strip.
(A pullout which will begin on ... ? My, that's a lot of positive PR for something you haven't even done yet!)
Israel is on track to begin evacuating all 21 Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip and another four isolated communities in the northern West Bank from the mid-August.
(If a thief brought back PART of what he had stolen from you, after stealing his house initially from you, would you applaud him as a great person? What if he'd killed many of your friends and family members along the way?)
Shalom also lashed out at London Mayor Ken Livingstone for
suggesting that suicide bombings against Israeli civilians were somehow justified.
(What, specifically, did he say?)
"In Israel we were shocked to hear those statements that were made by the mayor of London, and I do not want to repeat what some Israelis have said about him and about maybe his mental condition," Shalom said.
(However, in saying as much, I just did, so there!)
"There is no way to understand what the mayor of London has said. To distinguish between the blood of innocent Israeli civilians and the blood of others is unacceptable."
(What, specifically, did he say? What were his exact words?)
______________________________________________________
Montreal Muslim News Network - http://www.montrealmuslimnews.net
Listen to Caravan, produced by Samaa Elibyari, every Wednesday from 2-3PM:
http://www.montrealmuslimnews.net/caravan.htm
see also:
Police Chiefs who went on training visit to Israel
Below is the list of Ontario Police Chiefs and other senior officials who went on the Canadian Jewish Congress/Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police sponsored trip to Israel March 1 to 8 to learn about Israeli "policing methods".
(It should be noted that the "Canadian Jewish Congress" is now a Zionist organization, after its popularly-elected Board was pushed out, and a Zionist "Emergency Cabinet" was installed, to deal with the growing "demonization (education about) Zionism and its Apartehid State in Palestine. This just happened to coincide with several prominent appointments to the Government of Canada of Zionists.)
http://bc.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/3102
Various
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
Interesting to See Who Still Supports Bush/PNAC/Bliar
28.07.2005 02:25
http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:xGE0SXGaseQJ:www.rednova.com/news/international/169478/blair_israels_greatest_friend__ambassador_to_uk/%20%22Tony%20Blair%20last%20December%20when%20he%20visited%20Israel%22&hl=en
New Israeli Settlement in Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem Old City near Al Aqsa Mosque could ignite a Third Intifada
sraeli planners have approved the construction of a new Jewish settlement in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem’s Old City meters away from the Al Aqsa Mosque, the third holiest Islamic site in the world. Ori Shitreet, chief engineer at the Jerusalem municipality, initially rejected the project because it “conflicts with plans to preserve the old city,” but approved it later on.
The plan is to build 30 new apartments for Jews only on three dunams (three-quarters of an acre) of land near the Al Aqsa Mosque as well as a recreational area for the 16 Jewish families who currently live in the Muslim Quarter in settlements under heavy guard. A synagogue is also planned to be built in the Muslim Quarter.
Palestinian and some Israeli officials call these plans a blatant attempt to create facts on the ground and ethnically cleanse the Old City’s historic Muslim Quarter, an act of overt incitement, while the world is distracted by the Gaza Disengagement. Israel’s tactic of seizing Palestinian lands and declaring them “green areas,” which Palestinians are forbidden from building on, and later turning these lands over to settlements is one of its most insidious tools for strangling East Jerusalem with illegal settlements in an attempt to take the city off the negotiating table, in clear violation of international law.
Palestinians have always insisted that there can be no peace without Israel returning Arab East Jerusalem, which they captured and illegally annexed in 1967, to the Palestinians for the capital of their future state. International law unambiguously backs this position, and for the Israeli government to prejudice the status of the city in such an provocative way at such a sensitive time belies their lack of interest in a just and peaceful solution to these conflicts.
Such a provocation could spark even more unrest than Sharon’s infamous visit to the Al Aqsa Mosque compound in September 2000 with scores of armed guards, the spark that touched off the powder keg of the Second Intifada.
Israel has not abandoned plans to destroy the homes of over a thousand Palestinians living in the Silwan neighborhood near Jerusalem’s Old City in order to construct an archeological park. Such moves are obviously political and, along with Israel’s unilateral removal of between 55,000 and 100,000 Palestinians from Jerusalem with its illegal Wall, might spark a crisis in the Middle East that could have global implications.
Sharon has admitted that the Wall and new settlements are being built for political purposes and that his Gaza disengagement is a tactical decision designed to strengthen Israel’s hold on the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The Gaza strip has only 8,000 settlers living on approximately 20% of Gaza’s land among over a million Palestinians.
While the Disengagement has been grabbing headlines for months, thousands of illegal settlement housing units have been constructed in the West Bank in an attempt to prejudice final status negotiations and thwart plans for a just, negotiated, peaceful resolution to the decades-long conflict.
http://www.palestinemonitor.org/nueva_web/updates_news/updates/muslim_quarter.htm
Don't Fall for the PsyOps
Prevention is better than cure
28.07.2005 10:22
IDF
Maybe
28.07.2005 12:36
Irene
Scratch a hippie, find a nazi...
28.07.2005 12:54
They are:
1) Indymedia. Lots and lots of people who are so blinkered by their hatred of Blair and desire to impose their way of life and thinking on the rest of the world that they are unwilling to listen to any debate on the matter.
2) Radical extremist Muslims, who are so blinkered by their religious fundamentalism and their desire to impose their way of thinking (that's no rights for women, no life for homosexuals and a swift stoning for adulterers) on the rest of the world that they are unwilling to listen to any debate on the matter.
3) Far-right fruitcakes, who are so blinkered by their nationalist nuttiness, anti-semitism and desire to impose their way of thinking on the rest of the world that they are unwilling to listen to any debate on the matter.
If I were you, I'd think twice about whether that's the kind of company you want to be keeping.
A
And ... ?
28.07.2005 22:31
There's only one group suggesting that we take these LIARS at their word, and don't need to see the evidence - those supporting this Neo-Fascism.
Since they've become so small in number recently, they're not too hard to identify ...
Take notes.
Called a Red Herring - or a LIE
How Intimidatory
28.07.2005 23:55
Spoken like a true policeman.
anon
Rudi Giuliani & Bin Netanhayu; Bin Laden's General's
30.07.2005 09:17
It's funny to see the various forms of denial. One, you have people who refuse to examine the many discrepancies simply based on partisan ideology. And two, you have people who can't seem to grasp the possibility of powerful factions within our own governments( oil, banking, pharma, defense contractors, etc.) perpetrating and/or having foreknowlege of such atrocites on their own citizens for personal and polotical gain. The latter example of people need to accept that Western governments have a long documented history of such atrocites. The first set of partisan scoffers are hopeless.
Do you not all get it by now? They want global control masked behind the facade of "spreading democracy". These people in power in the US are the same people that were in power all through the 1980's. ( massacres of Panama, Chile, Grenada, Lebanon, Gulf War, Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador, etc. Every single one of these "operations" used the same excuse..."spreading democracy". Now word has it from a source inside the Iraqi Parliament, that the new "Constitution" completely strips women of their rites. It's the Taliban all over again. DOn't believe for a second that Bush and Blair were ever against the Taliban. They gave them power for over a decade until the Afghan leaders whelched on a deal with Poppa Bush in Houston.
By the way, with the London attacks, it's of my opinion that the 7/7 attacks were carried out by a Israeli, US, and/or UK anti-terrorism unit under the guise of the "anti-terrorism security exercise's" that were taking place that same morning. Exactly like 9-11, these "exercises" were the same as the eventual attack. Bombs in the same subway stations at exactly the same time they exploded in real life. I believe there was supposed to be 6 explosions total that day. That was what was initially reported by Reuters and the BBC. Six explosions. Suspicions were mounting and there was proving to be too much to cover up, so they staged the 7-21 attacks to distract attention away from the questions mounting from the 1st 7-7 attacks. The use of military explosives. The fact that witnesses claimed the bomb was UNDER the train. Or that Peter Power won't say WHO his company(Visor Consultants) was contracted by to conduct drills for that morning. My money is on Bin Netanhayu and Rudi Giuliani. Both were a stones throw from the bombing on 7/7. And BOTH were a stones throw from the attacks on NYC on 9-11. Both of them own "security companies". And we know now that Netanhayu knew of these London attacks BEFORE they happened. You investigate Giuliani and Netanhayu, and you've got it.
mondo
Homepage: http://nascarblue.blogspot.com