Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Where did "Boom!!" Go?

Site Being Hacked? | 22.07.2005 00:16

Why do my collections of 7/7 links keep disappearing?

A distinct pattern has developed here. SHOUT as loud as you can while making allegations such as these, then quietly retract that position when the facts refute your story.

Guess they must have forgot the part about military explosives being used on 7/7. Perhaps the reason for this phony story ... ?

Egypt chemist 'not bomb suspect'

Mr Nashar says he was on holiday in Egypt when he was arrested

An Egyptian chemist detained in Cairo has been cleared of any links with the London bomb attacks, officials say.
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/46958 91.stm

Site Being Hacked?

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

...

22.07.2005 07:13

Can you make a coherent point (please)?

magoo


...because they are utter crap?

22.07.2005 08:13

While posters to this site may wish to flatter themselves that there posted material is being hidden due to its being 'too close to the truth' another, far more likely, explanation, is that even the most liberal of moderators is dismayed at the amount of utter shite that is being posted about the London bombings and has decided to bin it.

Posting a lengthy series of links to lunatic conspiracy theory websites and re-iterating highly speculative and often completely unfounded assertions about recent events does not actually make a coherent argument. I am constantly amazed at the bizarre, utterly incredulous drivel that people would rather beleive in than accept even the most basic assertions of the 'official' line.

The fact that there was a statement very early on than military explosives may have been used, a statement later withdrawn given more detailed examinations of the bomb sites is by no means inconvertible truth that there has been a 'cover up'. Get a bloody grip mate.

Fed up of Conspiranoid Nonsense