Skip to content or view screen version

A Warning from Israel

Avnery, Pappe and Yaron | 18.07.2005 21:42 | Repression | Social Struggles | World

What May Come After the Evacuation of Jewish Settlers from the Gaza Strip
By URI DAVIS, ILAN PAPPE, and TAMAR YARON

We feel that it is urgent and necessary to raise the alarm regarding what may come during and after evacuation of Jewish settlers from the Gaza Strip occupied by Israel in 1967, in the event that the evacuation is implemented.

We held back on getting this statement published and circulated, seeking additional feedback from our peers. The publication in Ha'aretz (22 June 2005) quoting statements by General (Reserves) Eival Giladi, the head of the Coordination and Strategy team of the Prime Minister's Office, motivated us not to delay publication and circulation any further. Confirming our worst fears, General (Res.) Eival Giladi went on record in print and on television to the effect that "Israel will act in a very resolute manner in order to prevent terror attacks and [militant] fire while the disengagement is being implemented" and that "If pinpoint response proves insufficient, we may have to use weaponry that causes major collateral damage, including helicopters and planes, with mounting danger to surrounding people."

We believe that one primary, unstated motive for the determination of the government of the State of Israel to get the Jewish settlers of the Qatif (Katif) settlement block out of the Gaza Strip may be to keep them out of harm's way when the Israeli government and military possibly trigger an intensified mass attack on the approximately one and a half million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, of whom about half are 1948 Palestine refugees.

The scenario could be similar to what has already happened in the past - a tactic that Ariel Sharon has used many times in his military career - i.e., utilizing provocation in order to launch massive attacks.

Following this pattern, we believe that Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Defence Minister Shaul Mofaz are considering to utilize provocation for vicious attacks in the near future on the approximately one and a half million Palestinian inhabitants of the Gaza Strip: a possible combination of intensified state terror and mass killing. The Israeli army is not likely to risk the kind of casualties to its soldiers that would be involved in employing ground troops on a large scale in the Gaza Strip. With General Dan Halutz as Chief of Staff they don't need to. It was General Dan Halutz, in his capacity as Commander of the Israeli Air Force, who authorized the bombing of a civilian Gaza City quarter with a bomb weighing one ton, and then went on record as saying that he sleeps well and that the only thing he feels when dropping a bomb is a slight bump of the aircraft.

The initiators of this alarm have been active for many decades in the defence of human rights inside the State of Israel and beyond. We do not have the academic evidence to support our feeling, but given past behavior, ideological leanings and current media spin initiated by the Israeli government and military, we believe that the designs of the State of Israel are clear, and we submit that our educated intuition with matters pertaining to the defence of human rights has been more often correct than otherwise.

We urge all those who share the concern above to add their names to ours and urgently give this alarm as wide a circulation as possible.

Circulating and publishing this text may constitute a significant factor in deterring the Israeli government, thus protecting the Palestinian population in the Gaza Strip from this very possible catastrophe and contributing to prevent yet more war crimes from occurring.

Please circulate, and publish this alarm without delay!



Avnery, Pappe and Yaron
- e-mail: tiyaron@hazorea.org.il

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Salt...

18.07.2005 23:29

Considering some of Pappe's previous wilder claims, I would take this with a pinch of salt...

artaud


A pinch of salt to rub in the wounds.

18.07.2005 23:47

Operation Rainbow - May 2004
Operation Rainbow - May 2004

Given Israel's past history.......I'd be inclined to take it seriously.

Especially as the forces are already massing outside Gaza now, and Arik has ordered the army to act "without restrictions"

 http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2005/07/18/israeli_forces_mass_at_gaza_border/




ftp


???

19.07.2005 00:53

Previous warning such as what?

When a top Israeli General openly says on Israeli TV that "we may have to use weaponry that causes major collateral damage, including helicopters and planes, with mounting danger to surrounding people" I think this somthing to be taken seriously.

jonas


HOWEVER

19.07.2005 12:34

Maybe it is time to discuss "after the withdrawal" >

A occupier has certain responsibilities toward the "civilian" population of the enemy area it claims to control. That means we can LEGITIMATELY complain when Israel does various things. But let's suppose we are talking about after the end of the occupation. And although there are doubts it will be like this, let's suppose that the Israelis have FULLY withdrawn, simply hunkered down behind borders, even allowing the Palestinians to form their own state. Let's suppose that THEN we have an incident like this........

A group of Palestinain militants sets up a mortar position at place X and begins lobbing mortar shells across the border into Israel. Since the Israelis are not occupiers claiming to control the ground, have no desire to control the ground > they do not respond with a ground raid. Instead they have a battery of 155mm howiters open counterbattery fire obliterating everything within 100 meters of the mortar position >

Who is responsible for say 100 civilian collateral casualties if the militants chose a schoolyard for X rather than an open field for X?

Obviously the Israelis should first be allowing the Palestinian state authorities to handle the problem (if they can, if they have the will). Describe what you consider "reasonable" in terms of how effective the Palestinian state authorities woul;d have to be before you criticized Israel for the counterfire.

What you are seeing here (with articles like this) are Israeli "doves" concerned about potential Palestinians casualties, maybe large number of casualties, which might result if the disengagement does not also result in a settlement of differences to the point that things are relatively peaceful.

Mike
mail e-mail: stepbystpefarm mtdata.com