7/7: The Evolution of the Official Conspiracy Theory Continues
Various | 17.07.2005 21:09
A repository of related info from sources that did NOT help disseminate the LIES of the Neo-Fascists who are currently waging an illegal war of aggression for profit.
I would like to know why this post keeps appearing, and then DIsappearing. If the administrators are hiding it, I'd appreciate an explanation. If not, I'd say you have a Spook problem.
I would like to know why this post keeps appearing, and then DIsappearing. If the administrators are hiding it, I'd appreciate an explanation. If not, I'd say you have a Spook problem.
The sanctimonious expressions of outrage expressed by War Criminals Bliar and Bush fall a bit flat, due to their slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women, and children.
Phony 'Al-Qaeda' Responsibility Claim a Proven Hoax
Prison Planet | July 8 2005
With regard to the so-called claim of responsibility for the London bombings from an unknown Al-Qaeda group which the British government is treating as 'serious,' MSNBC reported,
MSNBC TV translator Jacob Keryakes, who said that a copy of the message was later posted on a secular Web site, noted that the claim of responsibility contained an error in one of the Quranic verses it cited. That suggests that the claim may be phony, he said.
"This is not something al-Qaida would do," he said.
Furthermore, the website posting doesn't even claim personal responsibility, it simply references "the heroic mujahedeen" in the third person. The posting praises the attack, it doesn't even take responsibility for it.
These facts didn't stop countless newspapers and Neo-Con websites automatically assuming Al-Qaeda (or Al-CIAda) was behind the attack.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/0807 05provenhoax.htm
Netanyahu Changed Plans Due to Warning
By AMY TEIBEL, Associated Press Writer Thu Jul 7, 7:14 AM ET
JERUSALEM - British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday's explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city, a senior Israeli official said.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050707/ap_on_re_mi_ea /israel_britain_explosions_1
These would have had to be fairly specific warnings, if they were enough to change these plans.
See No Evil: Spinning Netanyahu's London Terror Tip-off
The willful blindness of Israel's partisans is running smack up against a widely-circulated report in the mainstream media that Israel's Finance Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was tipped off to the London terrorist attacks.
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/index.php?id=P2205
The Phony (Mossad) Al Qaeda Cell in Palestine
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fakealqaeda.html
Questions grow on London bombing
http://www.simplyappalling.blogspot.com/#112083238 456427558
All these websites trace to Everyone's Internet in Houston, Texas --- EV1 has been hosting al-Qaeda for years. It's time someone asked why.
In a thread last year (now closed), soren asked: "Robert Marsh and EV1 -- have you no shame?"
Quote:
Robert Marsh answered:
"There is more to it than meets the public eye. That's all I have to say."
Perhaps those "law enforcement" officials who claim to be connected with the U.S. Customs Dept. might not be really LEOs at all -- instead they could be traitors that have been paid-off with some Saudi's petro-dollars to sell out America. By keeping those websites online and forcing ISPs to host the sites the effect is the same.
http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.ph p?p=10067
Why Al Qaeda Is Probably Not Behind The London Attacks - JUS
http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/56252
Al-Qaeda is a US/Israeli Intelligence Asset
http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/01-11-04/discussi on.cgi.28.html
Britain Explosions Surveillance
http://www.wavy.com/Global/story.asp?S=3567886
AL QAEDA WEBSITE TRACKS BACK TO ... MARYLAND???
Submitted by a reader.
From: http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/06/24/bin laden.video/
"These statements and others from al Qaeda have been appearing from time to time on a Web site called www.alneda.com.
"In recent months, the site, which experts suspect is closely linked to al Qaeda, also has posted manifestos signed "al Qaeda jihad" in which it says bin Laden is alive and well and preparing future attacks against the United States.
----------
Interesting "link" to al-Qaeda, as revealed by whois data for alneda.com:
alneda.com
Registration Service Provided By: DIRECTI
Contact: +91.2256797500
Website: http://www.directi.com
Domain Name: ALNEDA.COM
Registrant:
SFP, Inc
Jon David ( jondavid@4jon.com)
Po 312
Berlin
Maryland,21811
US
Tel. +011.4107237089
Creation Date: 16-Jul-2002
Expiration Date: 16-Jul-2013
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/alqmaryland.html
Explanation of al neda, based out of Maryland.
http://cryptome.org/alneda-wet.htm
False flag over London
By John Leonard
Online Journal Contributing Writer
July 8, 2005—Yesterday we saw a classic false flag attack in London, organized by western secret services to distract attention from the deepening political troubles of Bush and Blair, and perhaps even to create the pretext for war on Iran. Of course, Bush and his poll ratings have been sinking under scandals and rumblings of impeachment. Blair too has been badly hurt by the Downing Street memo.
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/070805Leon ard/070805leonard.html
Police hunt 'mercenary' terror gang recruited by al-Qa'ida
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article2981 05.ece
I guess the culprits identified by eyewitnesses were not the right colour to fit the prevailing Conspiracy Theory put forth by the LIARS and killers anxious to use these attacks as an excuse for further aggression.
Here's an antidote to the sanctimonious, hypocritical statements made by the LIARS and killers.
Lest We Forget; These Were Blair's Bombs
By John Pilger
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/071005X.shtml
The warning to Netanyahu blew the cover off the London bombings. Now, Mr, Cohen tries to get the frame-up pointed back in the intended direction again.
Note that his article is based upon Myth, not fact, such as the fake "bin Laden tapes", strategically released to help Bush.
It is interesting to note who still supports this Neo-Fascist Aggression, and this agenda of death. In doing so, people such as this authour hang themselves, and the people they work for.
Face up to the truth
http://www.guardian.co.uk/attackonlondon/comment/s tory/0,16141,1525261,00.html
Blair rejects calls for probe into bombings
By James Blitz, Political Editor, and Jimmy Burns
Published: July 10 2005 20:55 | Last updated: July 10 2005 20:55
London attacksTony Blair will on Monday reject Conservative demands for a government inquiry into last week's London bomb attacks, insisting such a move would distract from the task of catching the perpetrators.
As police and security services on Sunday continued searching for the bombers - thought to be Islamist terrorists - Downing Street said the prime minister believed an inquiry now into the outrage which killed at least 49 people would be a "ludicrous diversion."
Instead, in a statement to the Commons on Monday following last week's Group of Eight summit, Mr Blair is expected to focus on the direction the government must take to ensure future terrorism is defeated.
In particular, the prime minister believes there must be far greater co-operation among European Union governments in the fight against terrorism - a view Charles Clarke, the home secretary, is expected to drive home at an emergency meeting of EU interior ministers this week.
He is expected to tell his counterparts governments must ensure operators keep data on telephone and internet exchanges for up to a year.
He also indicated on Sunday that he would consider granting further "control orders" if he thought they were necessary.
Mr Clarke said he was "very optimistic indeed" that last Thursday's bombers would be tracked down. But he feared further attacks could take place until that happened. "That is why the number one priority has to be the catching of the perpetrators."
Police continued to sift through the debris from Thursday's four explosions - three in the London Underground and one on a bus - and to examine witness accounts and intelligence as part of their hunt for the bombers.
But police chiefs indicated that had yet to establish the identity or the whereabouts of the terrorists they suspect belong to an extremist Islamist cell in sympathy with the aims of Al-Qaeda.
Tension several cities remained high over the weekend. Police said they had arrested, under prevention of terrorism laws, three British nationals on an inward flight at Heathrow early on Sunday but insisted that any link with last Thursday's bombings was speculative. The three were expected to be released later on Sunday night, according to police sources.
But the arrests, the dozens of bomb alerts in the English capital and an evacuation in the Birmingam city centre over the weekend reflect the nervousness of both police and the general public at the prospect that the bombers were still at large and capable of striking again.
The police also revealed that there had been a few cases of attacks on British Muslims in the wake of the bombings - including one in which an individual was "seriously injured."
The revelation came as some government officials expressed irritation that an article in a Sunday newspaper by Sir John Stevens, the former Metropolitan Police commissioner, might stir up racial tensions. He said the bombers were "almost certainly" British - with many more born and bred here willing to attack.
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/8186face-f17a-11d9-9c3e-0 0000e2511c8.html
Report: Israel Was Warned Ahead of First Blast
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=853 46
Note how they stick to the official line that this is an attack by terrorists, even as evidence continues to mount of an inside job, with the bus cameras conveniently not working, military explosives, the desperate spin why they are looking for "white" perpetrators, and of course the warning to Netanyahu.
London Terror Tip-off: Timeline Refutes Israeli Denial
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/index.php?id=P2206
The 7/7 London Papers:
THE LONDON ATTACKS
The recent bombings in London have prompted me to create a database of information from various news sites. This page will be used for that collection at the present time. I do not believe these attacks were at all what the mainstream media and government officials want us to believe they were.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/londonarchive.ht ml
George and Tony Get their al-Qaeda Fix
Monday, July 11, 2005
By Greg Palast
The cruel, evil jerks who blew up the London subway last week, despite appropriating al-Qaeda's name for their website and T-shirts, have about as much to do with al-Qaeda as a Beatles tribute band has to do with the Fab Four.
http://gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=443&row=0
Aid to the Enemy
The fact is that the self-styled “conservatives” have wickedly aided and abetted terrorism and terrorists, both here and abroad…
http://gaelicstarover.blogspot.com/2005/07/aid-to- enemy.html
"Consider the increased amounts of 'chatter,” from the administration about 9-11 over the past 3 weeks (absent from most Government speeches until quite recently). It would be fascinating to do a key word analysis of the use of the word 9-11 in U.S. government speeches in the 3 weeks leading up to the London attack, as opposed to the previous 12 months."
Now, this is interesting!
The Bushling did, in fact, make a speach in which he frequently harped on 9/11, with a frequency unusual even for him.
As support for these monsters erodes, and their LIES are exposed, I fear what else they have up their sleeves. RIP the Walking Dead?
Bush renews linking Iraq war to 9/11
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05193/536589.stm
He got caught in a lie and nothing happened to him. Emboldened, he will now go on to greater and greater lies, because he knows you will do nothing about it.
Ricin: The plot that never was by Severin Carrell and Raymond Whitacker
news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/story.jsp?story=63 0187
The police in Leeds used military explosives during their raids on the homes in question, the same military explosives used in the London bombings, thus contaminating the scene.
How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 13 2005
Ten Step Method To Staging a Terrorist Attack
1) Hire a Crisis Management firm to set up an exercise that parallels the terrorist attack you are going to carry out. Have them run the exercise at the precise locations and at the very same time as the attack. If at any stage of the attack your Arabs get caught, tell the police it was part of an exercise.
2) Hire four Arabs and tell them they're taking part in an important exercise to help defend London from terrorist attacks. Strap them with rucksacks filled with deadly explosives. Tell the Arabs the rucksacks are dummy explosives and wouldn't harm a fly.
3) Tell four Arabs to meet up at London Underground and disperse, each getting on a different train. Make sure Arabs meet in a location where you can get a good mug shot of them all on CCTV which you can later endlessly repeat to drooling masses on television.
4) While four Arabs are in London, plant explosives in their houses in Leeds. Plant some explosives in one of their cars in Luton for the police to later discover. Remember that Qu'ran and flight manual in the hijackers' car? Ha ha, they fell for that one hook, line and sinker. No need to change tactics on this one.
5) Before the bombings take place, make sure you warn any of your buddies who are scheduled to be anywhere near where the bombs go off. If this gets leaked to the press, just deny it.
6) 4th Arab goes out partying in London night before and ends up getting out of bed late. No worries, the 9/11 'hijackers' did the same thing but that didn't cause us a big problem. 4th Arab catches bus to see if other Arabs are waiting for him. 4th Arab starts hearing about explosions in the London Underground. 4th Arab comes to the realization that this he is being set up and freaks out. 4th Arab starts fiddling in his rucksack. 4th Arab sets bomb off and is blown up.
If you hired any additional Arabs and they also got wind of the set up, make sure tere are GPS locators in the rucksacks so you can have police snipers ready to kill them before they can blow the whistle.
7) After the bombs go off, put out a story for over an hour that the explosions are a simple electrical fault. This gives you cover time to make sure the lazy bus Arab is dead and any other hired Arabs who reneged are also dead. Make sure any CCTV footage that doesn't support your official story is either seized or destroyed.
8) A few hours after the bombings, have one of your boys post an 'Al-Qaeda statement' claiming responsibility. Don't worry about the whole 'misreferencing the Qu'ran' thing, these idiots don't have the attention spans to figure it out.
9) After you have made sure that all the Arabs are dead and you are managing the story accordingly, wait for four days until the police piece together the story and find the explosives you planted in Leeds and in the car in Luton. Remember that Qu'ran and flight manual in the hijackers' car? Ha ha, they fell for that one hook, line and sinker. No need to change tactics this time either. The time delay will convince the gullible public that a real investigation is taking place. Create a background of the hired Arabs being militant Muslims. The drooling masses, as was the case with the '9/11 hijackers,' will ignore stories of neighbours saying they were the quiet, educated types who liked children and playing sports.
BBC excerpt: One local resident described him as "a nice lad".
"He liked to play football, he liked to play cricket. I'm shocked."
Another resident said he was just a "normal kid" who played basketball and kicked a ball around.
10) Sit back and enjoy as Blair and his minions grandstand in front of television cameras about staying the course in the war on terror. The pay raise, extra agency funding, and power to strip more freedoms and liberties made the ten easy steps to staging a terrorist attack a worthwhile venture. The dozens of dead people were necessary collateral damage. This is a dirty war, we need to be less moral than the terrorists to defeat them.
And that's how the government staged the bombings in ten easy steps.
Granted, you can interchange different pieces of the puzzle. The bombers could be real terrorists that knew exactly what they were doing. All you would need to do is control the 'mastermind' behind the attack and make sure his boys carried out the job in the way you wanted. Voila.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/1307 05teneasysteps.htm
The birth of the London bomb Official Story
You can practically hear the click at that moment in the life of every conspiracy when the police investigation turns into the Official Story. At that point, the investigation is intended to 'fix the facts' to the Official Story, and the cover-up begins. The story of the London bombs has made this transformation within the last twenty-four hours. The authorities thought it was small bombs with timers or triggered by cell phones and almost certainly not a suicide bomb attack; now they claim with certainty that the bombs were accompanied by handlers, some or all of whom may have died in the blasts, possibly by accident and probably intentionally (which means they were suicide bombers, as it is extremely unlikely that all four made a mistake). The original story was that it was an international al Qaeda operation; now it is British Muslims. In just a day or two, everything has changed.
http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2005/07/birth-of-lond on-bomb-official-story.html
Suicide bomber 'had all to live for'
http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/men/news/s/165/1 65813_suicide_bomber_had_all_to_live_for.html
Bet this guy never thought that simply by taking Mass Transit that day, his memory would be so horribly destroyed.
More ands more the evidence indicates that the accused men are not the type to engage in acts of terror, especially acts in which they will knowingly die.
Suicide is an act of someone who thinks they have nothing to live for. That does not fit these individuals.
Yet even as the evidence stares them in the face the media will not wander from the mandated first assumption of guilt-without-proof. Even as Bliar refuses any probe into the attacks which deviates from this narrative, and bases its findings in an unbiased manner upon the evidence alone.
Meanwhile, I call your attention to the mention of Israeli security company ICTS further down. ICTS, it should be remembered, handled security at all the airports from which the 9-11 planes departed.
Does Anyone Really Believe This Horsesh*t?
British authorities finger patsies within days of bombings, country drinks it up, and it’s like Déjà vu all over again
http://news.baou.com/main.php?action=recent&rid=20 340
The London Explosions, the Rogue Network, Bush and Iran
http://www.livejournal.com/users/mparent7777/98254 2.html
Commissioner of London Transport is ex CIA!
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/chief_officers.shtml
Bombing suspects' identities shock Leeds
http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2 005/07/14/bombing_suspects_identities_shock_leeds/ ?page=2
There was an interesting rumor going around London just before the attacks, that someone was trying to hire Muslims to play terrorists for a terror drill, to try to sneak onto the trains and buses with fake bombs to test out the security.
We know the terror drill was real. We know they were running the drill at the exact same stations the bombings actually occurred.
We know that the accused bombers don't fit the profile of men ready to die for Allah. Indeed it is reported that some of them were not particularly religious.
And we are faced with the strange claim that these men, one of whom had a new family, carried bombs set on timers yet stood there waiting for the bombs to explode.
This makes sense ONLY if they thought they were carrying fake bombs as part of a terror drill. This also explains the nervousness of the man on the bus who had probably just heard of the real explosions and was starting to suspect that the fake bomb he was carrying might not be fake after all.
"Hey you, Muslim person. Wanna make a hundred pounds? You could use that kind of dough, with a new kid and all. We're running a terror drill, and all you gotta do is take this here harmless backpack with a fake bomb inside to work with you tomorrow, just to see if the subway guards catch you or not. Mum's the word, this is national security and all; you can't tell anyone!"
The 'Birmingham Six' and British False Flags.
http://www.innocent.org.uk/cases/birmingham6/
UK police confident of al-Qaeda link to bombs
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=2 4&art_id=qw1121418181371B226
What a strange story. Of course you can find a link if you try hard enough. What baffles is that the detectives don't say that they can find those responsible, according to the evidence, but that they will "find a link", as Bliar has refused any probe into the attacks which deviates from this narrative.
Yet more on the London bombs
http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2005/07/yet-more-on-l ondon-bombs.html
CHANGING THE OFFICIAL STORY:
(Please see: "The 25 Tactics of Disinformation")
London bombs home-made from pharmacy ingredients
http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=1610072005
I'm sure the perpetrators hope that earlier reports about military explosives being used, as reported by initial investigators, will be pushed down the Memory Hole.
London, Bush and Mossad
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2005/07/ 15/london_bush_and_mossad.html
The sheer volume of Disinformation being churned out by the Israelis just damns them more than if they had said nothing.
I'm not "wild-eyed" at all, and the tale about Netanyahu Israel is attempting to push is contradicted by the timeline of events.
Methinks they protest too much!!
As with the alleged 9/11 "suicide hijackers" the families and friends of these young men are stunned and incredulous. There is nothing about these youths that fits with the "suicide bomber" profile. Security services could interpret the choice of innocents as clever planning by the masterminds who selected "ordinary young men...below the intelligence radar".
Much is made of the CCTV video tape of the four carrying large rucksacks before they were said to have boarded their respective trains. The tapes show them chatting and acting as though they were going on a hiking holiday. Was this just part of their ploy to move below the radar? Is it easy to appear nonchalant as you are about to blow yourselves and others to smithereens?
It is significant that this was a "suicide bombing" while the Madrid bombing was not (Even though the explosives in question were triggered by timing devices). Even so, the London Times reported that the alleged Madrid conspirators (who were all Government Informants) had met in a similar fashion before placing their bombs; after their bombs were placed they apparently got off the trains. Why? Why not a suicide mission? Or alternately, why couldn't these London lads place the charges and de-board?
The "suicide bomber" scenario works well to tell us who the bombers were. We all should know by now that only Muslims practice the suicide version of terrorism. To posit suicide in London obviates the need to investigate others. Remember the confusion in Madrid because Basque separatists were early suspects? If the bombers had blown themselves up on the trains no one would have suspected Basques; only Muslims commit suicide.
Why was Madrid handled differently? The simple answer is that the ubiquitous video cameras could not have picked up non-existent bombers, just like the video cameras at Logan, Newark and Dulles could not pick up non-existent hijackers.
The explosives in Madrid were not placed by passengers. The true perpetrators of these crimes learned from the Madrid experience and went back to their "suicide bomber" formula. This time they made sure to get "suicide bombers" (Arab victims) on camera, rucksacks and all. This alteration allows them to keep the advantage of the public preparation to identify only Muslims as suicide bombers. There will not be any uncomfortable questions about how explosives were placed or detonated.
The "Muslim suicide bomber" formula stops inquiry, stops thought, takes precedence in the public imagination over all objections. In the past four years the hundreds of inconsistencies and contrary pieces of evidence about 9/11 have not been able to remove the picture people have in their minds of Muslim hijackers flying planes into the WTC and the Pentagon.
The video of these four young men in London with their rucksacks will serve to end the public's interest in the questions of how, who, and why. No doubt the fact that a complete lack of video evidence, damning the 911 Official Theory, was noted by the perpetrators of this False Flag Attack.
But the skeptic might ask some questions here. Why did these "suicide bombers" seem so ordinary, so nonchalant before these awful deeds? Could it be that they were recruited as "extras" in the disaster exercises, and that their only purpose was to be seen in the video, meeting, and carrying their heavy rucksacks? And wouldn't their subsequent disappearance verify that what they carried in their sacks were those explosives that blew the trains, the bus and themselves to kingdom come?
ICTS Europe is an Israeli security company based in the Netherlands, a subsidiary of which is Huntleigh. Huntleigh was the security contractor at Logan Airport on 9/11 that failed to provide us with CCTV evidence of hijackers. The London Underground is one of Fortress GB's clients and according to their press release they provide smart card technology (personal details and biometric information) for contractors that operate in Tube stations. It makes me wonder if Peter Power's Visor Consultants were identified by these smart cards and if the four young men from Leeds were ever issued such ID.
Phony 'Al-Qaeda' Responsibility Claim a Proven Hoax
Prison Planet | July 8 2005
With regard to the so-called claim of responsibility for the London bombings from an unknown Al-Qaeda group which the British government is treating as 'serious,' MSNBC reported,
MSNBC TV translator Jacob Keryakes, who said that a copy of the message was later posted on a secular Web site, noted that the claim of responsibility contained an error in one of the Quranic verses it cited. That suggests that the claim may be phony, he said.
"This is not something al-Qaida would do," he said.
Furthermore, the website posting doesn't even claim personal responsibility, it simply references "the heroic mujahedeen" in the third person. The posting praises the attack, it doesn't even take responsibility for it.
These facts didn't stop countless newspapers and Neo-Con websites automatically assuming Al-Qaeda (or Al-CIAda) was behind the attack.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/0807 05provenhoax.htm
Netanyahu Changed Plans Due to Warning
By AMY TEIBEL, Associated Press Writer Thu Jul 7, 7:14 AM ET
JERUSALEM - British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday's explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city, a senior Israeli official said.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050707/ap_on_re_mi_ea /israel_britain_explosions_1
These would have had to be fairly specific warnings, if they were enough to change these plans.
See No Evil: Spinning Netanyahu's London Terror Tip-off
The willful blindness of Israel's partisans is running smack up against a widely-circulated report in the mainstream media that Israel's Finance Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was tipped off to the London terrorist attacks.
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/index.php?id=P2205
The Phony (Mossad) Al Qaeda Cell in Palestine
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fakealqaeda.html
Questions grow on London bombing
http://www.simplyappalling.blogspot.com/#112083238 456427558
All these websites trace to Everyone's Internet in Houston, Texas --- EV1 has been hosting al-Qaeda for years. It's time someone asked why.
In a thread last year (now closed), soren asked: "Robert Marsh and EV1 -- have you no shame?"
Quote:
Robert Marsh answered:
"There is more to it than meets the public eye. That's all I have to say."
Perhaps those "law enforcement" officials who claim to be connected with the U.S. Customs Dept. might not be really LEOs at all -- instead they could be traitors that have been paid-off with some Saudi's petro-dollars to sell out America. By keeping those websites online and forcing ISPs to host the sites the effect is the same.
http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.ph p?p=10067
Why Al Qaeda Is Probably Not Behind The London Attacks - JUS
http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/56252
Al-Qaeda is a US/Israeli Intelligence Asset
http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/01-11-04/discussi on.cgi.28.html
Britain Explosions Surveillance
http://www.wavy.com/Global/story.asp?S=3567886
AL QAEDA WEBSITE TRACKS BACK TO ... MARYLAND???
Submitted by a reader.
From: http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/06/24/bin laden.video/
"These statements and others from al Qaeda have been appearing from time to time on a Web site called www.alneda.com.
"In recent months, the site, which experts suspect is closely linked to al Qaeda, also has posted manifestos signed "al Qaeda jihad" in which it says bin Laden is alive and well and preparing future attacks against the United States.
----------
Interesting "link" to al-Qaeda, as revealed by whois data for alneda.com:
alneda.com
Registration Service Provided By: DIRECTI
Contact: +91.2256797500
Website: http://www.directi.com
Domain Name: ALNEDA.COM
Registrant:
SFP, Inc
Jon David ( jondavid@4jon.com)
Po 312
Berlin
Maryland,21811
US
Tel. +011.4107237089
Creation Date: 16-Jul-2002
Expiration Date: 16-Jul-2013
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/alqmaryland.html
Explanation of al neda, based out of Maryland.
http://cryptome.org/alneda-wet.htm
False flag over London
By John Leonard
Online Journal Contributing Writer
July 8, 2005—Yesterday we saw a classic false flag attack in London, organized by western secret services to distract attention from the deepening political troubles of Bush and Blair, and perhaps even to create the pretext for war on Iran. Of course, Bush and his poll ratings have been sinking under scandals and rumblings of impeachment. Blair too has been badly hurt by the Downing Street memo.
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/070805Leon ard/070805leonard.html
Police hunt 'mercenary' terror gang recruited by al-Qa'ida
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article2981 05.ece
I guess the culprits identified by eyewitnesses were not the right colour to fit the prevailing Conspiracy Theory put forth by the LIARS and killers anxious to use these attacks as an excuse for further aggression.
Here's an antidote to the sanctimonious, hypocritical statements made by the LIARS and killers.
Lest We Forget; These Were Blair's Bombs
By John Pilger
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/071005X.shtml
The warning to Netanyahu blew the cover off the London bombings. Now, Mr, Cohen tries to get the frame-up pointed back in the intended direction again.
Note that his article is based upon Myth, not fact, such as the fake "bin Laden tapes", strategically released to help Bush.
It is interesting to note who still supports this Neo-Fascist Aggression, and this agenda of death. In doing so, people such as this authour hang themselves, and the people they work for.
Face up to the truth
http://www.guardian.co.uk/attackonlondon/comment/s tory/0,16141,1525261,00.html
Blair rejects calls for probe into bombings
By James Blitz, Political Editor, and Jimmy Burns
Published: July 10 2005 20:55 | Last updated: July 10 2005 20:55
London attacksTony Blair will on Monday reject Conservative demands for a government inquiry into last week's London bomb attacks, insisting such a move would distract from the task of catching the perpetrators.
As police and security services on Sunday continued searching for the bombers - thought to be Islamist terrorists - Downing Street said the prime minister believed an inquiry now into the outrage which killed at least 49 people would be a "ludicrous diversion."
Instead, in a statement to the Commons on Monday following last week's Group of Eight summit, Mr Blair is expected to focus on the direction the government must take to ensure future terrorism is defeated.
In particular, the prime minister believes there must be far greater co-operation among European Union governments in the fight against terrorism - a view Charles Clarke, the home secretary, is expected to drive home at an emergency meeting of EU interior ministers this week.
He is expected to tell his counterparts governments must ensure operators keep data on telephone and internet exchanges for up to a year.
He also indicated on Sunday that he would consider granting further "control orders" if he thought they were necessary.
Mr Clarke said he was "very optimistic indeed" that last Thursday's bombers would be tracked down. But he feared further attacks could take place until that happened. "That is why the number one priority has to be the catching of the perpetrators."
Police continued to sift through the debris from Thursday's four explosions - three in the London Underground and one on a bus - and to examine witness accounts and intelligence as part of their hunt for the bombers.
But police chiefs indicated that had yet to establish the identity or the whereabouts of the terrorists they suspect belong to an extremist Islamist cell in sympathy with the aims of Al-Qaeda.
Tension several cities remained high over the weekend. Police said they had arrested, under prevention of terrorism laws, three British nationals on an inward flight at Heathrow early on Sunday but insisted that any link with last Thursday's bombings was speculative. The three were expected to be released later on Sunday night, according to police sources.
But the arrests, the dozens of bomb alerts in the English capital and an evacuation in the Birmingam city centre over the weekend reflect the nervousness of both police and the general public at the prospect that the bombers were still at large and capable of striking again.
The police also revealed that there had been a few cases of attacks on British Muslims in the wake of the bombings - including one in which an individual was "seriously injured."
The revelation came as some government officials expressed irritation that an article in a Sunday newspaper by Sir John Stevens, the former Metropolitan Police commissioner, might stir up racial tensions. He said the bombers were "almost certainly" British - with many more born and bred here willing to attack.
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/8186face-f17a-11d9-9c3e-0 0000e2511c8.html
Report: Israel Was Warned Ahead of First Blast
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=853 46
Note how they stick to the official line that this is an attack by terrorists, even as evidence continues to mount of an inside job, with the bus cameras conveniently not working, military explosives, the desperate spin why they are looking for "white" perpetrators, and of course the warning to Netanyahu.
London Terror Tip-off: Timeline Refutes Israeli Denial
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/index.php?id=P2206
The 7/7 London Papers:
THE LONDON ATTACKS
The recent bombings in London have prompted me to create a database of information from various news sites. This page will be used for that collection at the present time. I do not believe these attacks were at all what the mainstream media and government officials want us to believe they were.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/londonarchive.ht ml
George and Tony Get their al-Qaeda Fix
Monday, July 11, 2005
By Greg Palast
The cruel, evil jerks who blew up the London subway last week, despite appropriating al-Qaeda's name for their website and T-shirts, have about as much to do with al-Qaeda as a Beatles tribute band has to do with the Fab Four.
http://gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=443&row=0
Aid to the Enemy
The fact is that the self-styled “conservatives” have wickedly aided and abetted terrorism and terrorists, both here and abroad…
http://gaelicstarover.blogspot.com/2005/07/aid-to- enemy.html
"Consider the increased amounts of 'chatter,” from the administration about 9-11 over the past 3 weeks (absent from most Government speeches until quite recently). It would be fascinating to do a key word analysis of the use of the word 9-11 in U.S. government speeches in the 3 weeks leading up to the London attack, as opposed to the previous 12 months."
Now, this is interesting!
The Bushling did, in fact, make a speach in which he frequently harped on 9/11, with a frequency unusual even for him.
As support for these monsters erodes, and their LIES are exposed, I fear what else they have up their sleeves. RIP the Walking Dead?
Bush renews linking Iraq war to 9/11
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05193/536589.stm
He got caught in a lie and nothing happened to him. Emboldened, he will now go on to greater and greater lies, because he knows you will do nothing about it.
Ricin: The plot that never was by Severin Carrell and Raymond Whitacker
news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/story.jsp?story=63 0187
The police in Leeds used military explosives during their raids on the homes in question, the same military explosives used in the London bombings, thus contaminating the scene.
How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 13 2005
Ten Step Method To Staging a Terrorist Attack
1) Hire a Crisis Management firm to set up an exercise that parallels the terrorist attack you are going to carry out. Have them run the exercise at the precise locations and at the very same time as the attack. If at any stage of the attack your Arabs get caught, tell the police it was part of an exercise.
2) Hire four Arabs and tell them they're taking part in an important exercise to help defend London from terrorist attacks. Strap them with rucksacks filled with deadly explosives. Tell the Arabs the rucksacks are dummy explosives and wouldn't harm a fly.
3) Tell four Arabs to meet up at London Underground and disperse, each getting on a different train. Make sure Arabs meet in a location where you can get a good mug shot of them all on CCTV which you can later endlessly repeat to drooling masses on television.
4) While four Arabs are in London, plant explosives in their houses in Leeds. Plant some explosives in one of their cars in Luton for the police to later discover. Remember that Qu'ran and flight manual in the hijackers' car? Ha ha, they fell for that one hook, line and sinker. No need to change tactics on this one.
5) Before the bombings take place, make sure you warn any of your buddies who are scheduled to be anywhere near where the bombs go off. If this gets leaked to the press, just deny it.
6) 4th Arab goes out partying in London night before and ends up getting out of bed late. No worries, the 9/11 'hijackers' did the same thing but that didn't cause us a big problem. 4th Arab catches bus to see if other Arabs are waiting for him. 4th Arab starts hearing about explosions in the London Underground. 4th Arab comes to the realization that this he is being set up and freaks out. 4th Arab starts fiddling in his rucksack. 4th Arab sets bomb off and is blown up.
If you hired any additional Arabs and they also got wind of the set up, make sure tere are GPS locators in the rucksacks so you can have police snipers ready to kill them before they can blow the whistle.
7) After the bombs go off, put out a story for over an hour that the explosions are a simple electrical fault. This gives you cover time to make sure the lazy bus Arab is dead and any other hired Arabs who reneged are also dead. Make sure any CCTV footage that doesn't support your official story is either seized or destroyed.
8) A few hours after the bombings, have one of your boys post an 'Al-Qaeda statement' claiming responsibility. Don't worry about the whole 'misreferencing the Qu'ran' thing, these idiots don't have the attention spans to figure it out.
9) After you have made sure that all the Arabs are dead and you are managing the story accordingly, wait for four days until the police piece together the story and find the explosives you planted in Leeds and in the car in Luton. Remember that Qu'ran and flight manual in the hijackers' car? Ha ha, they fell for that one hook, line and sinker. No need to change tactics this time either. The time delay will convince the gullible public that a real investigation is taking place. Create a background of the hired Arabs being militant Muslims. The drooling masses, as was the case with the '9/11 hijackers,' will ignore stories of neighbours saying they were the quiet, educated types who liked children and playing sports.
BBC excerpt: One local resident described him as "a nice lad".
"He liked to play football, he liked to play cricket. I'm shocked."
Another resident said he was just a "normal kid" who played basketball and kicked a ball around.
10) Sit back and enjoy as Blair and his minions grandstand in front of television cameras about staying the course in the war on terror. The pay raise, extra agency funding, and power to strip more freedoms and liberties made the ten easy steps to staging a terrorist attack a worthwhile venture. The dozens of dead people were necessary collateral damage. This is a dirty war, we need to be less moral than the terrorists to defeat them.
And that's how the government staged the bombings in ten easy steps.
Granted, you can interchange different pieces of the puzzle. The bombers could be real terrorists that knew exactly what they were doing. All you would need to do is control the 'mastermind' behind the attack and make sure his boys carried out the job in the way you wanted. Voila.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/1307 05teneasysteps.htm
The birth of the London bomb Official Story
You can practically hear the click at that moment in the life of every conspiracy when the police investigation turns into the Official Story. At that point, the investigation is intended to 'fix the facts' to the Official Story, and the cover-up begins. The story of the London bombs has made this transformation within the last twenty-four hours. The authorities thought it was small bombs with timers or triggered by cell phones and almost certainly not a suicide bomb attack; now they claim with certainty that the bombs were accompanied by handlers, some or all of whom may have died in the blasts, possibly by accident and probably intentionally (which means they were suicide bombers, as it is extremely unlikely that all four made a mistake). The original story was that it was an international al Qaeda operation; now it is British Muslims. In just a day or two, everything has changed.
http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2005/07/birth-of-lond on-bomb-official-story.html
Suicide bomber 'had all to live for'
http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/men/news/s/165/1 65813_suicide_bomber_had_all_to_live_for.html
Bet this guy never thought that simply by taking Mass Transit that day, his memory would be so horribly destroyed.
More ands more the evidence indicates that the accused men are not the type to engage in acts of terror, especially acts in which they will knowingly die.
Suicide is an act of someone who thinks they have nothing to live for. That does not fit these individuals.
Yet even as the evidence stares them in the face the media will not wander from the mandated first assumption of guilt-without-proof. Even as Bliar refuses any probe into the attacks which deviates from this narrative, and bases its findings in an unbiased manner upon the evidence alone.
Meanwhile, I call your attention to the mention of Israeli security company ICTS further down. ICTS, it should be remembered, handled security at all the airports from which the 9-11 planes departed.
Does Anyone Really Believe This Horsesh*t?
British authorities finger patsies within days of bombings, country drinks it up, and it’s like Déjà vu all over again
http://news.baou.com/main.php?action=recent&rid=20 340
The London Explosions, the Rogue Network, Bush and Iran
http://www.livejournal.com/users/mparent7777/98254 2.html
Commissioner of London Transport is ex CIA!
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/chief_officers.shtml
Bombing suspects' identities shock Leeds
http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2 005/07/14/bombing_suspects_identities_shock_leeds/ ?page=2
There was an interesting rumor going around London just before the attacks, that someone was trying to hire Muslims to play terrorists for a terror drill, to try to sneak onto the trains and buses with fake bombs to test out the security.
We know the terror drill was real. We know they were running the drill at the exact same stations the bombings actually occurred.
We know that the accused bombers don't fit the profile of men ready to die for Allah. Indeed it is reported that some of them were not particularly religious.
And we are faced with the strange claim that these men, one of whom had a new family, carried bombs set on timers yet stood there waiting for the bombs to explode.
This makes sense ONLY if they thought they were carrying fake bombs as part of a terror drill. This also explains the nervousness of the man on the bus who had probably just heard of the real explosions and was starting to suspect that the fake bomb he was carrying might not be fake after all.
"Hey you, Muslim person. Wanna make a hundred pounds? You could use that kind of dough, with a new kid and all. We're running a terror drill, and all you gotta do is take this here harmless backpack with a fake bomb inside to work with you tomorrow, just to see if the subway guards catch you or not. Mum's the word, this is national security and all; you can't tell anyone!"
The 'Birmingham Six' and British False Flags.
http://www.innocent.org.uk/cases/birmingham6/
UK police confident of al-Qaeda link to bombs
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=2 4&art_id=qw1121418181371B226
What a strange story. Of course you can find a link if you try hard enough. What baffles is that the detectives don't say that they can find those responsible, according to the evidence, but that they will "find a link", as Bliar has refused any probe into the attacks which deviates from this narrative.
Yet more on the London bombs
http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2005/07/yet-more-on-l ondon-bombs.html
CHANGING THE OFFICIAL STORY:
(Please see: "The 25 Tactics of Disinformation")
London bombs home-made from pharmacy ingredients
http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=1610072005
I'm sure the perpetrators hope that earlier reports about military explosives being used, as reported by initial investigators, will be pushed down the Memory Hole.
London, Bush and Mossad
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2005/07/ 15/london_bush_and_mossad.html
The sheer volume of Disinformation being churned out by the Israelis just damns them more than if they had said nothing.
I'm not "wild-eyed" at all, and the tale about Netanyahu Israel is attempting to push is contradicted by the timeline of events.
Methinks they protest too much!!
As with the alleged 9/11 "suicide hijackers" the families and friends of these young men are stunned and incredulous. There is nothing about these youths that fits with the "suicide bomber" profile. Security services could interpret the choice of innocents as clever planning by the masterminds who selected "ordinary young men...below the intelligence radar".
Much is made of the CCTV video tape of the four carrying large rucksacks before they were said to have boarded their respective trains. The tapes show them chatting and acting as though they were going on a hiking holiday. Was this just part of their ploy to move below the radar? Is it easy to appear nonchalant as you are about to blow yourselves and others to smithereens?
It is significant that this was a "suicide bombing" while the Madrid bombing was not (Even though the explosives in question were triggered by timing devices). Even so, the London Times reported that the alleged Madrid conspirators (who were all Government Informants) had met in a similar fashion before placing their bombs; after their bombs were placed they apparently got off the trains. Why? Why not a suicide mission? Or alternately, why couldn't these London lads place the charges and de-board?
The "suicide bomber" scenario works well to tell us who the bombers were. We all should know by now that only Muslims practice the suicide version of terrorism. To posit suicide in London obviates the need to investigate others. Remember the confusion in Madrid because Basque separatists were early suspects? If the bombers had blown themselves up on the trains no one would have suspected Basques; only Muslims commit suicide.
Why was Madrid handled differently? The simple answer is that the ubiquitous video cameras could not have picked up non-existent bombers, just like the video cameras at Logan, Newark and Dulles could not pick up non-existent hijackers.
The explosives in Madrid were not placed by passengers. The true perpetrators of these crimes learned from the Madrid experience and went back to their "suicide bomber" formula. This time they made sure to get "suicide bombers" (Arab victims) on camera, rucksacks and all. This alteration allows them to keep the advantage of the public preparation to identify only Muslims as suicide bombers. There will not be any uncomfortable questions about how explosives were placed or detonated.
The "Muslim suicide bomber" formula stops inquiry, stops thought, takes precedence in the public imagination over all objections. In the past four years the hundreds of inconsistencies and contrary pieces of evidence about 9/11 have not been able to remove the picture people have in their minds of Muslim hijackers flying planes into the WTC and the Pentagon.
The video of these four young men in London with their rucksacks will serve to end the public's interest in the questions of how, who, and why. No doubt the fact that a complete lack of video evidence, damning the 911 Official Theory, was noted by the perpetrators of this False Flag Attack.
But the skeptic might ask some questions here. Why did these "suicide bombers" seem so ordinary, so nonchalant before these awful deeds? Could it be that they were recruited as "extras" in the disaster exercises, and that their only purpose was to be seen in the video, meeting, and carrying their heavy rucksacks? And wouldn't their subsequent disappearance verify that what they carried in their sacks were those explosives that blew the trains, the bus and themselves to kingdom come?
ICTS Europe is an Israeli security company based in the Netherlands, a subsidiary of which is Huntleigh. Huntleigh was the security contractor at Logan Airport on 9/11 that failed to provide us with CCTV evidence of hijackers. The London Underground is one of Fortress GB's clients and according to their press release they provide smart card technology (personal details and biometric information) for contractors that operate in Tube stations. It makes me wonder if Peter Power's Visor Consultants were identified by these smart cards and if the four young men from Leeds were ever issued such ID.
Various
Comments
Hide the following comment
Quite Amazing, Really....
18.07.2005 00:33
In the same way that we cannot discount conspiracies, however, we must also apply the test of evidence. This is all the more important where a particularly severe accusation is being made, such as government involvement in the Twin Towers attacks or the Tube bombings.
I've fairly scrupulously been following the Tube conspiracies. I don't pretend to have an encylopaedic knowledge but I've followed most of the links and references. I've looked over sites such as whatreallyhappened or prisonplanet.
And this is where my problem comes in. The "evidence" of conspiracy is just not compelling when considered by any objective yardstick. What we have are lots of hypotheses based on very flimsy pieces - a quote from the Israelis regarding advance warnings, talk of CCTV on buses going down, bomb damage patterns on the bus, and so on. It falls far short of the standards which a reasonable person would consider acceptable proof of guilt.
In response the conspiracists suggest various reasons including the lack of clear proof is evidence in itself (an interesting circular argument for just about anything) and media manipulation. But in the absence of compelling evidence, all we have is an unproven hypothesis. And I have yet to see a good explanation as to how (based on their previous track records) the Government agencies concerned have managed to keep it all quiet.
Until those who propound such hypotheses can provide an acceptable level of evidence then they will have no chance of convincing the wider population. Much as I enjoy taking potshots at the wilder suggestions (I'm stuck in the house with a broken leg and nothing else to do), if you want to be taken seriously then raise your evidencial standards.
Paranoid Pete