CCTV sabotage or something more sinister?
Og | 16.07.2005 13:21 | Repression | London
Thank God MI6 do a sloppy job and thank Heavens some people still have the guts to tell the truth. The only ones who are buying the official story, which is falling apart, are police and politicians who want to enforce more obscene Draconian terror laws.
London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005
We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach,
the company responsible for the majority of London buses.
Our contact works a route roughly one mile from the site
of the bus bombing last Thursday.
The bus driver pointed out that the number 30 bus was the only one to be re-routed after the initial bombs went off in the London Underground, every other bus carried on its normal journey, but for some reason this bus was diverted.
The driver notes the following about CCTV maintainence.
"CCTV gets maintained at least 2 or 3 times a week and can digitally store upto 2 whole weeks worth of footage. This is done by a private contractor.... So when I heard that the CCTV wasn't working on a vehicle that's no more than 2 years old since last June.....I'm sorry that's rubbish, I work for the company I know different."
Also a point of interest....last saturday a contractor came
to inspect the CCTV on the buses at the depot, According to my supervisor the person spent more than 20 hours over that weekend, 20 hours to see if the CCTV is working. Also that person who came was not a regular contractor, for security reasons the same few people always come to the depot to carry out work, this time it was different.
Drivers in the depot already think the so called bombers had inside help because it was to organised. Some even think it had help from the company."
I have received other information suggesting that the CCTV
is regularly maintained and checked. The police pay the bus company to check it, and the bus company makes a substantial profit out of this, so all parties benefit from keeping the CCTV systems working.
This information makes it all the more suspicious that the bus cameras were not working.
Was the mammoth 20 hour inspection session of the CCTV
a means of disabling the CCTV, or something even darker?
Were the contractors, who were not familiar to the bus company employees, actually placing the bomb?
But don't worry, the media are drooling over this picture of supposed suicide bomber Hasib Hussain, who we are told detonated the bus bomb.
Well, it's a grainy picture of a Muslim guy with a rucksack,
case closed! That's good enough evidence for me, I'm going back to sleep.
It's beyond doubt that these four Muslims were framed.
They were most likely hired as MI6 spies, sent to Pakistan
and then brought back and told they were to take part
in an important exercise to test national security.
Give them the rucksacks, get them on the trains
and then detonate the bombs remotely.
Do you really believe for a second that guys with 8 month babies and guys who taught diasbled schoolchildren would want to blow themselves up and kill other innocent people?
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005
We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach,
the company responsible for the majority of London buses.
Our contact works a route roughly one mile from the site
of the bus bombing last Thursday.
The bus driver pointed out that the number 30 bus was the only one to be re-routed after the initial bombs went off in the London Underground, every other bus carried on its normal journey, but for some reason this bus was diverted.
The driver notes the following about CCTV maintainence.
"CCTV gets maintained at least 2 or 3 times a week and can digitally store upto 2 whole weeks worth of footage. This is done by a private contractor.... So when I heard that the CCTV wasn't working on a vehicle that's no more than 2 years old since last June.....I'm sorry that's rubbish, I work for the company I know different."
Also a point of interest....last saturday a contractor came
to inspect the CCTV on the buses at the depot, According to my supervisor the person spent more than 20 hours over that weekend, 20 hours to see if the CCTV is working. Also that person who came was not a regular contractor, for security reasons the same few people always come to the depot to carry out work, this time it was different.
Drivers in the depot already think the so called bombers had inside help because it was to organised. Some even think it had help from the company."
I have received other information suggesting that the CCTV
is regularly maintained and checked. The police pay the bus company to check it, and the bus company makes a substantial profit out of this, so all parties benefit from keeping the CCTV systems working.
This information makes it all the more suspicious that the bus cameras were not working.
Was the mammoth 20 hour inspection session of the CCTV
a means of disabling the CCTV, or something even darker?
Were the contractors, who were not familiar to the bus company employees, actually placing the bomb?
But don't worry, the media are drooling over this picture of supposed suicide bomber Hasib Hussain, who we are told detonated the bus bomb.
Well, it's a grainy picture of a Muslim guy with a rucksack,
case closed! That's good enough evidence for me, I'm going back to sleep.
It's beyond doubt that these four Muslims were framed.
They were most likely hired as MI6 spies, sent to Pakistan
and then brought back and told they were to take part
in an important exercise to test national security.
Give them the rucksacks, get them on the trains
and then detonate the bombs remotely.
Do you really believe for a second that guys with 8 month babies and guys who taught diasbled schoolchildren would want to blow themselves up and kill other innocent people?
Og
Comments
Hide the following 12 comments
sigh
16.07.2005 14:01
magoo
Welcome down the rabbit hole
16.07.2005 14:20
>> London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious
This is the most surreal comment I have seen since the last surreal comment ("neighbour says bomb-suspect was a nice lad").
Alec
Ah but...
16.07.2005 15:00
"CCTV gets maintained at least 2 or 3 times a week and can digitally store upto 2 whole weeks worth of footage."
Because, like, if you were a bus compnay you'd buy CCTV that needs constant maintenance. Got to be cost efficient, eh?
"Drivers in the depot already think the so called bombers had inside help because it was to organised. Some even think it had help from the company."
A cunning marketing move by Stagecoach that, eh? I can see ol' Ann Gloag's new moto now - "Citylinking - smart thinking, Stagecoach - we blow our busses up".
"It's beyond doubt that these four Muslims were framed. "
Really. "Beyond doubt"? That's a high hurdle. Lets see your evidence? And we don't mean PrisonPlanet or the dodgy Israeli links.
This may turn out to be a conspiracy - hell weirder things have happened - but there's nothing worse that the shambles we're getting from the conspiricists.
Boab
MI6 - who are you referring to Magoo?
16.07.2005 16:06
It looks like either:
a) You a farting from the wrong orifice or
b) You know something which the intelligence services don't know about themselves
Given events of the past few decades, I'd say that both scenarios are equally likely - but your breath stinks!
Josef F
sigh
16.07.2005 17:36
http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1059736061019
I rest my case...
Ooooh personal hygiene insults. Very good.
Halitosis Magoo
I'm still watching you Magoo.
16.07.2005 19:16
A. Lexicon
But Magoo
16.07.2005 19:18
There's healthy scepticism, then there's a line. Then there's that we dot miles away, the otherside of the line. That's the conspiricists.
I will, of course, eat my words if it turns out to be Mossad....
Boab
The Spoon Brigade
16.07.2005 20:57
I'm still sleeping with one eye open and one hand on my x-bow.
:-)
Poison-tipped Umbrella Magoo
perhaps
16.07.2005 21:02
PFI balls
ah, they were hired as MI5 spies
16.07.2005 21:32
Knock, knock.
"Yes?"
"Good morning. My name is Smith, and I'm from MI5."
"Really?"
"Yes. Can I come in?"
"Of course. Have a cup of tea ... now what's this about?"
"Well, we'd like you to spy for us."
"Spy for you? Oh goodie. Yes, please. What do I have to do?"
"Well, now, here's this ticket for Pakistan ..."
You can just see it, can't you?
sceptic
MI9
16.07.2005 21:41
Alex (Lexicon Smith)
???
18.07.2005 07:23
You going to have pot quizzes about the Rattenlinie next?
bemused magoo