Plot Holes
Various | 16.07.2005 07:22
Several holes exist in the current Official Conspiracy Theory coming from No. 10. Considering these, and their probitive nature, why would Bliar refuse to investigate ... ?
Interesting Spin
"We are as certain as we can be that four people were killed and they were the four people carrying bombs," Blair added."
(Wow, "as certain as we can be", yet he doesn't say that he knows for certain, nor that the evidence proves such a thing. Not exactly what the one-dimensional coverage would have you believe.)
"Commenting on the possible role of Al Qaeda, Blair said, "Al Qaeda is not an organization. Al Qaeda is a way of working ... but this has the hallmark of that approach."
(Since no connection can be made, Bliar plays the same game the Bush Administration played with Iraq, explaining away their LIES about non-existent "al Qaeda" connections in the country by saying that "people with their mindset" were in Iraq.)
(In Leeds, another house was being searched in the Beeston area. Sources said detectives are hunting two other people known as the "mastermind" and the "chemist" in the attacks. You mean THIS approach, Tony? The Phony (Mossad)
Al Qaeda Cell in Palestine
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fakealqaeda.html )
I'd venture a guess that the "chemist" is whoever created these bombs using military explosives - an issue the Gov't/Media are currently working overtime to push down the Memory Hole - and that the "mastermind" is above the Pay Scale of anyone investigating the thing - as suggested by Bliar's refusal to probe the attacks in any "unguided" manner.)
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162476,00.html
WAS IT SUICIDE?
Why did they buy return train tickets to Luton? Why did they buy pay & display tickets for cars? Why were there no usual shouts of 'Allah Akhbar'? Why were bombs in bags and not on their bodies?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=15742951%26method=full%26siteid=94762%26headline=was%2dit%2dsuicide%2d%2d-name_page.html
(Why would they take the time to set timing devices on the bombs, but then sit and wait to die?)
"We are as certain as we can be that four people were killed and they were the four people carrying bombs," Blair added."
(Wow, "as certain as we can be", yet he doesn't say that he knows for certain, nor that the evidence proves such a thing. Not exactly what the one-dimensional coverage would have you believe.)
"Commenting on the possible role of Al Qaeda, Blair said, "Al Qaeda is not an organization. Al Qaeda is a way of working ... but this has the hallmark of that approach."
(Since no connection can be made, Bliar plays the same game the Bush Administration played with Iraq, explaining away their LIES about non-existent "al Qaeda" connections in the country by saying that "people with their mindset" were in Iraq.)
(In Leeds, another house was being searched in the Beeston area. Sources said detectives are hunting two other people known as the "mastermind" and the "chemist" in the attacks. You mean THIS approach, Tony? The Phony (Mossad)
Al Qaeda Cell in Palestine
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fakealqaeda.html ) I'd venture a guess that the "chemist" is whoever created these bombs using military explosives - an issue the Gov't/Media are currently working overtime to push down the Memory Hole - and that the "mastermind" is above the Pay Scale of anyone investigating the thing - as suggested by Bliar's refusal to probe the attacks in any "unguided" manner.)
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162476,00.html WAS IT SUICIDE?
Why did they buy return train tickets to Luton? Why did they buy pay & display tickets for cars? Why were there no usual shouts of 'Allah Akhbar'? Why were bombs in bags and not on their bodies?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=15742951%26method=full%26siteid=94762%26headline=was%2dit%2dsuicide%2d%2d-name_page.html (Why would they take the time to set timing devices on the bombs, but then sit and wait to die?)
Various