After the Bridge Party, report and pics.
Guido | 10.07.2005 02:18 | G8 2005 | Culture
Having spent a several hours baking on the bridge with the other party goers I went to a local pub to cool down and re-hydrate. After less than half a pint I saw the majority of the bridge party goers marching past so I followed.
After marching through and round the traffic and round in at least one seemingly pointless circle, the march went under a motorway and into an estate well away from the town centre. The cops kept calm blocking roads that they did not want the marchers to go down while struggling to keep up with a fragmented gathering that did not seem to be going anywhere in particular. Eventually when the march reached an estate where the locals were hostile to say the least, a large number of Police (still Glasgow) headed off the march and threw a cordon around it. They were joined by more Police from Nottinghamshire and the protesters remained surrounded for some time before being released into a local space for dispersal.
And now some questions for the total fuckwits who were leading this 'action'. They know who they are:
1) Was the crowd being led anywhere in particular or was this just an attempt to get loads of people nicked and section 60'd while of course giving immediate justification to the huge amount of money spent on the Police operation?
2) Did the people at the front have a map or any local knowledge of the area at all?
3) Why were people led into an impoverished loyalist council estate. Is there anywhere in Glasgow where they could have been less welcome?
4) Were the self appointed leaders of the march working to a hidden agenda or just unbelievably stupid?
When people march in the financial district or west end chanting 'Whose streets? Out streets?' among the symbols of power it is an obvious act of defiance. However when people (many of whom look and sound like whey are from Surrey) march through a deprived working class area chanting 'Whose streets? Our streets!' it creates a scenario that is at best embarrassing, at worst downright dangerous. I think a debate about tactics is called for.
Anyone who was there or has has an opinion can hit the comment option.
After marching through and round the traffic and round in at least one seemingly pointless circle, the march went under a motorway and into an estate well away from the town centre. The cops kept calm blocking roads that they did not want the marchers to go down while struggling to keep up with a fragmented gathering that did not seem to be going anywhere in particular. Eventually when the march reached an estate where the locals were hostile to say the least, a large number of Police (still Glasgow) headed off the march and threw a cordon around it. They were joined by more Police from Nottinghamshire and the protesters remained surrounded for some time before being released into a local space for dispersal.
And now some questions for the total fuckwits who were leading this 'action'. They know who they are:
1) Was the crowd being led anywhere in particular or was this just an attempt to get loads of people nicked and section 60'd while of course giving immediate justification to the huge amount of money spent on the Police operation?
2) Did the people at the front have a map or any local knowledge of the area at all?
3) Why were people led into an impoverished loyalist council estate. Is there anywhere in Glasgow where they could have been less welcome?
4) Were the self appointed leaders of the march working to a hidden agenda or just unbelievably stupid?
When people march in the financial district or west end chanting 'Whose streets? Out streets?' among the symbols of power it is an obvious act of defiance. However when people (many of whom look and sound like whey are from Surrey) march through a deprived working class area chanting 'Whose streets? Our streets!' it creates a scenario that is at best embarrassing, at worst downright dangerous. I think a debate about tactics is called for.
Anyone who was there or has has an opinion can hit the comment option.
Guido
e-mail:
guidoreports@riseup.net
Comments
Hide the following 8 comments
on e reason
10.07.2005 09:03
( and showing us a better route ) and a missed opportunity to go to the motorway.
The cops and some of the 'marchers' seemed to want to stop people heading to the motorway!!!! I and a few otherswalked through the pathetic police line and back again! There was absolutely no reason to get penned in unless you really wanted to!
One explanation just after was that certain individuals were trying to de-esculate the action!!!
One reason given was the bombs in London. Is this an executive decision?!
Funny - Bombs and murders in Palestine, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Siera-Leone, Pacha-America, Darfur to name but a few - plus the 30,000 people being murdered every day through starvation due to G8 imperialists. Did I mention DU, the arms trade, concentration camps, colonialism, genocide, black ops etc etc. So many reasons. I am not condoning murdering people on public transport but there is a much wider picture.......
We should protest even more against these bastards because this is how we have ARRIVED at this sorry state of affairs.
They will step up the propaganda. The Royal WE and corporate Olympics. Bob Gelolf has saved Africa by licking cameras, and we are ALL INNOCENT. yeah right. More executive decisions?
destroy the corporations
hmm
10.07.2005 10:44
con
A steet party
10.07.2005 17:28
It 'reclaimed' a five lane bridge in the middle of the Glasgow one way system, hundreds of people danced and generally enjoyed themselves in the sun and so did many children (not an option at most of the weeks events). On top of that the police were forced to close a slip road off the M8 motorway, a break away group nearly got onto the motorway at a different point, another group closed a second bridge and the clowns had fun at a Shell garage. Not bad really.
Yes it may not have changed the world over night but, as someone else suggested, it was a return to pre J18 style actions, a welcome rest on the last day after a mobilisation heavily influenced by black block tactics. Not that they don’t have there time and place! However, if people had smashed their way through Glasgow city centre it may not have gone down too well with Glasgow residents, would have been a pointless exercise, and the day would not have received the same media coverage it did, coverage which suggested that some people feel the G8 will not address climate change, detailed the problems and local discontent with the M74 and if nothing else illustrated that the Dissent! network was not just about rioting.
G
G
Glasgow
10.07.2005 17:50
Why not try it anyway? You did with Edinburgh & Stirling…why not Glasgow?
Confused
Street party
10.07.2005 20:16
Was it a fancy dress party?
Oops caught out again people!
Outside Observer
Some more thoughts
10.07.2005 22:14
The atmosphere on the bridge was great, characterised in particular by the cheers when the clowns arrived. What was also particularly noticable was the appreciation on the faces of Glasgow residents walking across the bridge, many of whome actually came and joined the party. Even those who didn't stay still seemed to be perfectly happy about what was happening. There was a clear purpose for the action, and lots of concise leaflets being handed out to people passers-by explaining exactly why we were here.
But seriously, the march....unbelievable. As we left the bridge the cheers were amazing, but it soon became clear that no-one really knew where we were going or why we were going there. Walking past shops and a few houses you could gradually see the expressions on the faces of the people watching from the pavement becoming less and less impressed. When one member of the (four or five-strong) black bloc decided to turn over a wheelie bin and then almost cause a car crash it became obvious that this was a lost cause. We quickly decided that this wasn't something that we wanted to be a part of, so we turned down a side street and found ourselves in a tiny pub with twenty or so locals, all of them completely at a loss as to why this was going on. And, frankly, we had a difficult job of explaining why there were a few hundred people running around their city perpetrating mindless acts of petty violence.
Please, someone explain to me...what does this achieve?! The bridge action was brilliant, we really did seem to be contributing to something of worth, and the opportunity for some local outreach was enormously valuable. But all the 'march' achieved was some really fucked off Glaswegians trying to get home on a Friday afternoon.
Talking to these people in the pub, what they were universally impressed by was the camp in Stirling. They said that it was obvious that it was a group of people who were demonstrating an alternative way of life simply by living it, peacefully and without imposition on those who chose not to take part. I know a lot of the balaclava brigade will be spouting something about no change without conflict, but the conduct of the vast majority of those who stayed in Stirling certainly only did us favours.
I personally think that A to B marches, or mass 'walks' as we witnessed in Glasgow can only come a shoddy third to empowered direct action and community outreach. If we really want to change anything, marching around Glasgow or Hyde Park is almost totally worthless. I'm taking a slightly unsuitable example, but imagine if all those on the million-strong anti-war march had decided to blockade all of the military take-off points around Britain instead? We really could have stopped the war! And accuse me of pandering to the capitalist establishment or whatever if you will, but again, if we want to change anything we are going to have to present a publicly attractive face in the mass media. Why give them the opportunity to plaster the front pages with photos of black bloccers hitting policemen? I really do believe that our success is dependent on demonstrations (in both senses of the word) such as the eco-village in Stirling. Because what better way is there of trying to change the system than by actually living the way we want to live?
Josh
e-mail: josh_hall@btinternet.com
Sadly yes.
13.07.2005 16:50
It's down to everyone attending an action to decide (as an individual) wether or not to follow some self appointed gimp into an blatent trap. If you dont know or trust them and they dont seem to have a plan then tell them to fuck off before they get us all killed!
Party goer.
Pointless
21.07.2005 16:59
G