Abuse of rights?

Pic 1: Are you suggesting the police dug a moat around the campsite in Stirling or is it the fact that the River Forth has been running through Stirling for many a year.

Pic 2: The Ochil hills were put there by the police to stop the "free right to roam" were they?

Pic 3: A helicopter, dropping anthrax over the camp were they?

Pic 4: Tents close together. Police tactics so, like the great fire of London, one goes they all go?

Pic 5: Stirling Council red plastic fence. Keeping the campers from the River Forth. One already fell in earlier last week and had to be resued because of strong current.

Pic 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11: Well the campers woul dlet people in Tuesday night who then wrecked Stirling, Wednesday morning. What do the campers expect? Roses and applause?

Rest of Pics: Not showing up on my computer screen. Just a red (X) in the corner so can't make a comment.

That second picture is a hoot--presumably they're spying on you through the power lines? Why do anarchist tourists always feign great oppression when they show up to trash a town?

Be aware that historically many people have faced actual police abuse and comparing this to having a police dog ripping into your leg in Birmingham, Alabama, well that's injustice.

The police may not have entered the camp to smash up skulls but they were still resticting people right of freedom of movement.

Maybe some of the protesters did smah up spme things but most didn't and collective punishment is outlawed in the geneva convention

"...but they were still resticting people right of freedom of movement. "

How about the protesters blockading motorways in Scotland? Isn't that restricting peoples right of freedom of movement too then?

Let me get this right here. It's bad for the police to restict protesters right to freedom of movement but it's ok for the protesters to restrict the people of Scotlands right to freedom of movement?